Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
This systematic review (SR) aimed to evaluate implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and biological/prosthetic complications of extra-short 4 mm dental implants. An electronic search without language or date restrictions was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles p...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Healthcare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/3/315 |
| _version_ | 1797541571015475200 |
|---|---|
| author | Vittorio Moraschini Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão Pietro Montemezzi Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida Kayvon Javid Jamil Awad Shibli José Mauro Granjeiro Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia |
| author_facet | Vittorio Moraschini Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão Pietro Montemezzi Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida Kayvon Javid Jamil Awad Shibli José Mauro Granjeiro Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia |
| author_sort | Vittorio Moraschini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This systematic review (SR) aimed to evaluate implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and biological/prosthetic complications of extra-short 4 mm dental implants. An electronic search without language or date restrictions was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until August 2020. Prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the clinical performance of extra-short 4 mm dental implants were included. Studies were independently assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. The protocol of this SR was registered in the PROSPERO database under number CRD42019139709. Four studies were included in the present SR. There was no significant difference in implant survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.75) between extra-short 4 mm and long implants. After 12 months of function, the extra-short implants had a significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.003) lower marginal bone loss (MBL) rate when compared to long implants. Extra-short implants had a lower number of biological and prosthetic complications when compared to long implants. After 12 months of follow-up, extra-short 4 mm dental implants placed in the mandible exhibit satisfactory clinical outcomes concerning implant survival rate and MBL when compared to longer implants, with a low number of biological and prosthetic complications. A higher number of RCTs with longer follow-up is necessary for the future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:17:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-df54028faab0403b8d414e8d39d6fdb5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2227-9032 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:17:50Z |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Healthcare |
| spelling | doaj.art-df54028faab0403b8d414e8d39d6fdb52023-11-21T10:16:03ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322021-03-019331510.3390/healthcare9030315Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and MetanalysisVittorio Moraschini0Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão1Pietro Montemezzi2Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky3Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida4Kayvon Javid5Jamil Awad Shibli6José Mauro Granjeiro7Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia8Periodontology Department, Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro 20271-020, BrazilBiotechnology Department, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, BrazilPrivate Practice, 24128 Bergamo, ItalyGraduate Program, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, BrazilGraduate Program, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, BrazilGraduate Program, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, BrazilPeriodontology and Oral Implantology Department, University of Guarulhos, Guarulhos 07023-070, BrazilBioengineering Laboratory, National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias 25250-020, BrazilOral Surgery Department, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, BrazilThis systematic review (SR) aimed to evaluate implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and biological/prosthetic complications of extra-short 4 mm dental implants. An electronic search without language or date restrictions was performed in five databases and in gray literature for articles published until August 2020. Prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the clinical performance of extra-short 4 mm dental implants were included. Studies were independently assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. The protocol of this SR was registered in the PROSPERO database under number CRD42019139709. Four studies were included in the present SR. There was no significant difference in implant survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.75) between extra-short 4 mm and long implants. After 12 months of function, the extra-short implants had a significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.003) lower marginal bone loss (MBL) rate when compared to long implants. Extra-short implants had a lower number of biological and prosthetic complications when compared to long implants. After 12 months of follow-up, extra-short 4 mm dental implants placed in the mandible exhibit satisfactory clinical outcomes concerning implant survival rate and MBL when compared to longer implants, with a low number of biological and prosthetic complications. A higher number of RCTs with longer follow-up is necessary for the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/3/315dental implantsshort dental implantsmarginal bone losssystematic review |
| spellingShingle | Vittorio Moraschini Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão Pietro Montemezzi Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida Kayvon Javid Jamil Awad Shibli José Mauro Granjeiro Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis Healthcare dental implants short dental implants marginal bone loss systematic review |
| title | Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis |
| title_full | Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis |
| title_fullStr | Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis |
| title_short | Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis |
| title_sort | clinical comparation of extra short 4 mm and long 8 mm dental implants placed in mandibular bone a systematic review and metanalysis |
| topic | dental implants short dental implants marginal bone loss systematic review |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/3/315 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vittoriomoraschini clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT carlosfernandodealmeidabarrosmourao clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT pietromontemezzi clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT ingridchavescavalcantekischinhevsky clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT danielcostaferreiradealmeida clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT kayvonjavid clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT jamilawadshibli clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT josemaurogranjeiro clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT monicadiuanacalasansmaia clinicalcomparationofextrashort4mmandlong8mmdentalimplantsplacedinmandibularboneasystematicreviewandmetanalysis |