Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries

Rate All That Apply (RATA) is a derivative of the popularly used Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) question format. For RATA, consumers select all terms or statements that apply from a given list and then continue to rate those selected based on how much they apply. With Rate All Statements (RATING), a wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denis Richard Seninde, Edgar Chambers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/4/702
_version_ 1797540055833640960
author Denis Richard Seninde
Edgar Chambers
author_facet Denis Richard Seninde
Edgar Chambers
author_sort Denis Richard Seninde
collection DOAJ
description Rate All That Apply (RATA) is a derivative of the popularly used Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) question format. For RATA, consumers select all terms or statements that apply from a given list and then continue to rate those selected based on how much they apply. With Rate All Statements (RATING), a widely used standard format for testing, consumers are asked to rate all terms or statements according to how much they apply. Little is known of how the RATA and RATING question formats compare in terms of aspects such as attribute discrimination and sample differentiation. An online survey using either a RATA or RATING question format was conducted in five countries (Brazil, China, India, Spain, and the USA). Each respondent was randomly assigned one of the two question formats (<i>n</i> = 200 per country per format). Motivations for eating items that belong to five food groups (starch-rich, protein-rich, dairy, fruits and vegetables, and desserts) were assessed. More “apply” responses were found for all eating motivation constructs within RATING data than RATA data. Additionally, the standard indices showed that RATING discriminated more among motivations than RATA. Further, the RATING question format showed better discrimination ability among samples for all motivation constructs than RATA within all five countries. Generally, mean scores for motivations were higher when RATA was used, suggesting that consumers who might choose low numbers in the RATING method decide not to check the term in RATA. More investigation into the validity of RATA and RATING data is needed before use of either question format over the other can be recommended.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:54:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df5634f78915412b8759f3b364406a2d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:54:40Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-df5634f78915412b8759f3b364406a2d2023-11-21T12:02:37ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582021-03-0110470210.3390/foods10040702Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five CountriesDenis Richard Seninde0Edgar Chambers1Center for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USACenter for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USARate All That Apply (RATA) is a derivative of the popularly used Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) question format. For RATA, consumers select all terms or statements that apply from a given list and then continue to rate those selected based on how much they apply. With Rate All Statements (RATING), a widely used standard format for testing, consumers are asked to rate all terms or statements according to how much they apply. Little is known of how the RATA and RATING question formats compare in terms of aspects such as attribute discrimination and sample differentiation. An online survey using either a RATA or RATING question format was conducted in five countries (Brazil, China, India, Spain, and the USA). Each respondent was randomly assigned one of the two question formats (<i>n</i> = 200 per country per format). Motivations for eating items that belong to five food groups (starch-rich, protein-rich, dairy, fruits and vegetables, and desserts) were assessed. More “apply” responses were found for all eating motivation constructs within RATING data than RATA data. Additionally, the standard indices showed that RATING discriminated more among motivations than RATA. Further, the RATING question format showed better discrimination ability among samples for all motivation constructs than RATA within all five countries. Generally, mean scores for motivations were higher when RATA was used, suggesting that consumers who might choose low numbers in the RATING method decide not to check the term in RATA. More investigation into the validity of RATA and RATING data is needed before use of either question format over the other can be recommended.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/4/702check-all-that-apply (CATA)‎rate all that apply (RATA)‎ratingrate all statementscheck all statementssurvey
spellingShingle Denis Richard Seninde
Edgar Chambers
Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
Foods
check-all-that-apply (CATA)‎
rate all that apply (RATA)‎
rating
rate all statements
check all statements
survey
title Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
title_full Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
title_fullStr Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
title_short Comparing the Rate-All-That-Apply and Rate-All-Statements Question Formats across Five Countries
title_sort comparing the rate all that apply and rate all statements question formats across five countries
topic check-all-that-apply (CATA)‎
rate all that apply (RATA)‎
rating
rate all statements
check all statements
survey
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/4/702
work_keys_str_mv AT denisrichardseninde comparingtherateallthatapplyandrateallstatementsquestionformatsacrossfivecountries
AT edgarchambers comparingtherateallthatapplyandrateallstatementsquestionformatsacrossfivecountries