Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
There is a lack of understanding concerning the differences between laypeople’s and professional judges’ conceptions of justifications for sentencing. We conducted an online quasi-experimental study with 50 active judges and 200 laypeople. Participants were presented with a vignette describing sever...
Main Authors: | Eiichiro Watamura, Tomohiro Ioku |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678294/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
by: Eiichiro Watamura, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases
by: Eiichiro Watamura, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Wrongful Conviction Rates and Death Penalty Support: Acceptability Hypothesis in Japan
by: Eiichiro Watamura, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
by: Eiichiro Watamura, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
The Judges' Considerations Against Sentence for Narcotics Abuse Category I
by: Dimas Didi Darmawan
Published: (2023-03-01)