Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Theref...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junwei Zhang, Mingze Du, Zhe Li, Lulu Wang, Jijun Hu, Bei Zhao, Yingying Feng, Xiaolin Chen, Lijun Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x
_version_ 1828082748340830208
author Junwei Zhang
Mingze Du
Zhe Li
Lulu Wang
Jijun Hu
Bei Zhao
Yingying Feng
Xiaolin Chen
Lijun Sun
author_facet Junwei Zhang
Mingze Du
Zhe Li
Lulu Wang
Jijun Hu
Bei Zhao
Yingying Feng
Xiaolin Chen
Lijun Sun
author_sort Junwei Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. Results The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. Conclusions After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:56:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df5db42473b3422fb2a8c352bd75edf1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-2215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:56:48Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Ovarian Research
spelling doaj.art-df5db42473b3422fb2a8c352bd75edf12023-01-02T00:21:28ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152018-07-011111810.1186/s13048-018-0432-xFresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort studyJunwei Zhang0Mingze Du1Zhe Li2Lulu Wang3Jijun Hu4Bei Zhao5Yingying Feng6Xiaolin Chen7Lijun Sun8The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityThe Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityAbstract Background Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. Results The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. Conclusions After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-xFrozen embryo transferFresh embryo transferNeonatal birthweightLow birthweightSmall-for-gestational ageMacrosomia
spellingShingle Junwei Zhang
Mingze Du
Zhe Li
Lulu Wang
Jijun Hu
Bei Zhao
Yingying Feng
Xiaolin Chen
Lijun Sun
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
Journal of Ovarian Research
Frozen embryo transfer
Fresh embryo transfer
Neonatal birthweight
Low birthweight
Small-for-gestational age
Macrosomia
title Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full term singleton birth a retrospective cohort study
topic Frozen embryo transfer
Fresh embryo transfer
Neonatal birthweight
Low birthweight
Small-for-gestational age
Macrosomia
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x
work_keys_str_mv AT junweizhang freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT mingzedu freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT zheli freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT luluwang freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT jijunhu freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT beizhao freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yingyingfeng freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT xiaolinchen freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT lijunsun freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy