Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dongwook Oh, Sung Yong Han, Sang Hyub Lee, Seong-Hun Kim, Woo Hyun Paik, Hyung-Ku Chon, Tae Jun Song, Se Woo Park, Jae Hee Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-03-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241239551
_version_ 1827313564979822592
author Dongwook Oh
Sung Yong Han
Sang Hyub Lee
Seong-Hun Kim
Woo Hyun Paik
Hyung-Ku Chon
Tae Jun Song
Se Woo Park
Jae Hee Cho
author_facet Dongwook Oh
Sung Yong Han
Sang Hyub Lee
Seong-Hun Kim
Woo Hyun Paik
Hyung-Ku Chon
Tae Jun Song
Se Woo Park
Jae Hee Cho
author_sort Dongwook Oh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the preferred technique for better outcomes has not yet been evaluated. Objectives: We compared the long-term outcomes between the techniques. Design: Retrospective comparative study. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS with transmural stent placement for distal MBO between 2009 and 2022. The primary outcome was the stent patency. The secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs) of each technique, and independent risk factors for stent dysfunction. Results: In all, 115 patients were divided into EUS-CDS ( n = 56) and EUS-HGS ( n = 59) groups. Among them, technical success was achieved in 98.2% of EUS-CDS and 96.6% of EUS-HGS groups. Furthermore, clinical success was 96.4% in EUS-CDS and 88.1% in EUS-HGS groups, without significant difference ( p = 0.200). The mean duration of stent patency for EUS-CDS was 770.3 days while that for EUS-HGS was 164.9 days ( p = 0.010). In addition, the only independent risk factor for stent dysfunction was systematic treatment after EUS-BD [hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval 0.238 (0.066–0.863), p = 0.029]. The incidence of stent dysfunction of EUS-HGS was higher than EUS-CDS (35.1% versus 18.2%, 0.071), despite no significant differences even in late AEs. Conclusion: In distal MBO, EUS-CDS may be better than EUS-HGS with longer stent patency and fewer AEs. Furthermore, systematic treatment after EUS-BD is recommended for the improvement of stent patency.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:10:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df6306fca89244b29dc2f03f00f3c531
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-2848
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:10:55Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-df6306fca89244b29dc2f03f00f3c5312024-03-20T09:04:05ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology1756-28482024-03-011710.1177/17562848241239551Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective studyDongwook OhSung Yong HanSang Hyub LeeSeong-Hun KimWoo Hyun PaikHyung-Ku ChonTae Jun SongSe Woo ParkJae Hee ChoBackground: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the preferred technique for better outcomes has not yet been evaluated. Objectives: We compared the long-term outcomes between the techniques. Design: Retrospective comparative study. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS with transmural stent placement for distal MBO between 2009 and 2022. The primary outcome was the stent patency. The secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs) of each technique, and independent risk factors for stent dysfunction. Results: In all, 115 patients were divided into EUS-CDS ( n = 56) and EUS-HGS ( n = 59) groups. Among them, technical success was achieved in 98.2% of EUS-CDS and 96.6% of EUS-HGS groups. Furthermore, clinical success was 96.4% in EUS-CDS and 88.1% in EUS-HGS groups, without significant difference ( p = 0.200). The mean duration of stent patency for EUS-CDS was 770.3 days while that for EUS-HGS was 164.9 days ( p = 0.010). In addition, the only independent risk factor for stent dysfunction was systematic treatment after EUS-BD [hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval 0.238 (0.066–0.863), p = 0.029]. The incidence of stent dysfunction of EUS-HGS was higher than EUS-CDS (35.1% versus 18.2%, 0.071), despite no significant differences even in late AEs. Conclusion: In distal MBO, EUS-CDS may be better than EUS-HGS with longer stent patency and fewer AEs. Furthermore, systematic treatment after EUS-BD is recommended for the improvement of stent patency.https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241239551
spellingShingle Dongwook Oh
Sung Yong Han
Sang Hyub Lee
Seong-Hun Kim
Woo Hyun Paik
Hyung-Ku Chon
Tae Jun Song
Se Woo Park
Jae Hee Cho
Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
title Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
title_short Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study
title_sort comparison of long term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction a multicenter retrospective study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241239551
work_keys_str_mv AT dongwookoh comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sungyonghan comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sanghyublee comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT seonghunkim comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT woohyunpaik comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT hyungkuchon comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT taejunsong comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT sewoopark comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jaeheecho comparisonoflongtermoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandcholedochoduodenostomyfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstructionamulticenterretrospectivestudy