Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies

Are different religions associated with different social, cognitive, and emotional tendencies? Although major world religions are known to encourage social interactions and help regulate emotions, it is less clear to what extent adherents of various religions differ in these dimensions in daily life...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Yu Chen, Tsung-Ren Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00113/full
_version_ 1818047021879132160
author Chih-Yu Chen
Tsung-Ren Huang
Tsung-Ren Huang
author_facet Chih-Yu Chen
Tsung-Ren Huang
Tsung-Ren Huang
author_sort Chih-Yu Chen
collection DOAJ
description Are different religions associated with different social, cognitive, and emotional tendencies? Although major world religions are known to encourage social interactions and help regulate emotions, it is less clear to what extent adherents of various religions differ in these dimensions in daily life. We thus carried out a large-scale sociolinguistic analysis of social media messages of Christians and Buddhists living in the United States. After controlling for age and gender effects on linguistic patterns, we found that Christians used more social words and fewer cognitive words than Buddhists. Moreover, adherents of both religions, similarly used more positive than negative emotion words on Twitter, although overall, Christians were slightly more positive in verbal emotional expression than Buddhists. These sociolinguistic patterns of actual rather than ideal behaviors were also paralleled by language used in the popular sacred texts of Christianity and Buddhism, with the exception that Christian texts contained more negative and fewer positive emotion words than Buddhist texts. Taken together, our results suggest that the direct or indirect influence of religious texts on the receivers of their messages may partially, but not fully, account for the verbal behavior of religious adherents.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:59:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df65248a62864365a9d28d86da72c4ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:59:10Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-df65248a62864365a9d28d86da72c4ff2022-12-22T01:53:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-02-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00113388345Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional TendenciesChih-Yu Chen0Tsung-Ren Huang1Tsung-Ren Huang2Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TaiwanCenter for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TaiwanAre different religions associated with different social, cognitive, and emotional tendencies? Although major world religions are known to encourage social interactions and help regulate emotions, it is less clear to what extent adherents of various religions differ in these dimensions in daily life. We thus carried out a large-scale sociolinguistic analysis of social media messages of Christians and Buddhists living in the United States. After controlling for age and gender effects on linguistic patterns, we found that Christians used more social words and fewer cognitive words than Buddhists. Moreover, adherents of both religions, similarly used more positive than negative emotion words on Twitter, although overall, Christians were slightly more positive in verbal emotional expression than Buddhists. These sociolinguistic patterns of actual rather than ideal behaviors were also paralleled by language used in the popular sacred texts of Christianity and Buddhism, with the exception that Christian texts contained more negative and fewer positive emotion words than Buddhist texts. Taken together, our results suggest that the direct or indirect influence of religious texts on the receivers of their messages may partially, but not fully, account for the verbal behavior of religious adherents.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00113/fullreligionChristianityBuddhismsociolinguisticssocial interactioncognition
spellingShingle Chih-Yu Chen
Tsung-Ren Huang
Tsung-Ren Huang
Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
Frontiers in Psychology
religion
Christianity
Buddhism
sociolinguistics
social interaction
cognition
title Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
title_full Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
title_fullStr Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
title_full_unstemmed Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
title_short Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies
title_sort christians and buddhists are comparably happy on twitter a large scale linguistic analysis of religious differences in social cognitive and emotional tendencies
topic religion
Christianity
Buddhism
sociolinguistics
social interaction
cognition
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00113/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chihyuchen christiansandbuddhistsarecomparablyhappyontwitteralargescalelinguisticanalysisofreligiousdifferencesinsocialcognitiveandemotionaltendencies
AT tsungrenhuang christiansandbuddhistsarecomparablyhappyontwitteralargescalelinguisticanalysisofreligiousdifferencesinsocialcognitiveandemotionaltendencies
AT tsungrenhuang christiansandbuddhistsarecomparablyhappyontwitteralargescalelinguisticanalysisofreligiousdifferencesinsocialcognitiveandemotionaltendencies