The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars
Abstract Background The study investigated the fracture resistance of root-filled maxillary premolars with class II cavities restored by different restorations. Methods A total of 55 intact maxillary premolar teeth were included (n = 11). G1 as positive control group, 44 teeth underwent root canal t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0663-7 |
| _version_ | 1828469424382803968 |
|---|---|
| author | Hakan Göktürk Emine Şirin Karaarslan Elif Tekin Bilal Hologlu Işıl Sarıkaya |
| author_facet | Hakan Göktürk Emine Şirin Karaarslan Elif Tekin Bilal Hologlu Işıl Sarıkaya |
| author_sort | Hakan Göktürk |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The study investigated the fracture resistance of root-filled maxillary premolars with class II cavities restored by different restorations. Methods A total of 55 intact maxillary premolar teeth were included (n = 11). G1 as positive control group, 44 teeth underwent root canal treatment, and MOD cavities were prepared. (G2) no restoration, (G3) direct composite restoration, (G4) direct composite strengthened with buccal to lingual pre-impregnated glass-fibers and (G5) ceramic inlay restoration. After thermocycling, fracture resistance test was performed and fracture type was recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Chisquare test. Results The mean fracture resistance was as follows: G1 had the highest fracture resistance, G2 had the lowest (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the fracture resistance values of the groups that underwent different restorations (G3, G4, G5) (p > 0.05). According to fracture type, the groups showed similar results (p > 0.05). A significant level of unrestorable fracture was detected in G5 (ceramic inlay) (p < 0.05). Conclusions All of the restoration techniques investigated herein increased the fracture strength of teeth; however, all of these values were lower than the fracture resistance of intact teeth. There were no significant differences between the fracture resistance values of the groups that underwent different restorations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:39:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-df70d30fc7ac4ff7b4f3e344d0982be5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:39:28Z |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-df70d30fc7ac4ff7b4f3e344d0982be52022-12-22T01:20:40ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312018-11-011811810.1186/s12903-018-0663-7The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolarsHakan Göktürk0Emine Şirin Karaarslan1Elif Tekin2Bilal Hologlu3Işıl Sarıkaya4Department of Endodontics, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of DentistryDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of DentistryDepartment of Endodontics, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of DentistryDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of DentistryDepartment of Prosthodontics, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of DentistryAbstract Background The study investigated the fracture resistance of root-filled maxillary premolars with class II cavities restored by different restorations. Methods A total of 55 intact maxillary premolar teeth were included (n = 11). G1 as positive control group, 44 teeth underwent root canal treatment, and MOD cavities were prepared. (G2) no restoration, (G3) direct composite restoration, (G4) direct composite strengthened with buccal to lingual pre-impregnated glass-fibers and (G5) ceramic inlay restoration. After thermocycling, fracture resistance test was performed and fracture type was recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Chisquare test. Results The mean fracture resistance was as follows: G1 had the highest fracture resistance, G2 had the lowest (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the fracture resistance values of the groups that underwent different restorations (G3, G4, G5) (p > 0.05). According to fracture type, the groups showed similar results (p > 0.05). A significant level of unrestorable fracture was detected in G5 (ceramic inlay) (p < 0.05). Conclusions All of the restoration techniques investigated herein increased the fracture strength of teeth; however, all of these values were lower than the fracture resistance of intact teeth. There were no significant differences between the fracture resistance values of the groups that underwent different restorations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0663-7Endodontic treatmentFracture resistancePre-impregnated glass-fibers |
| spellingShingle | Hakan Göktürk Emine Şirin Karaarslan Elif Tekin Bilal Hologlu Işıl Sarıkaya The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars BMC Oral Health Endodontic treatment Fracture resistance Pre-impregnated glass-fibers |
| title | The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars |
| title_full | The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars |
| title_fullStr | The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars |
| title_short | The effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root-filled premolars |
| title_sort | effect of the different restorations on fracture resistance of root filled premolars |
| topic | Endodontic treatment Fracture resistance Pre-impregnated glass-fibers |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0663-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hakangokturk theeffectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT eminesirinkaraarslan theeffectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT eliftekin theeffectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT bilalhologlu theeffectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT isılsarıkaya theeffectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT hakangokturk effectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT eminesirinkaraarslan effectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT eliftekin effectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT bilalhologlu effectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars AT isılsarıkaya effectofthedifferentrestorationsonfractureresistanceofrootfilledpremolars |