Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates

The paper studies the mechanical properties of glass fibre reinforced polymers (GFRP) with various types and orientation of reinforcement. Analyzed specimens manufactured in the infusion process are made of polymer vinyl ester resin reinforced with glass fibres. Several samples were examined contain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomasz Wiczenbach, Tomasz Ferenc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polish Academy of Sciences 2021-09-01
Series:Archives of Civil Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.pan.pl/Content/120656/30_ACE-00008_A4.pdf
_version_ 1811314638196834304
author Tomasz Wiczenbach
Tomasz Ferenc
author_facet Tomasz Wiczenbach
Tomasz Ferenc
author_sort Tomasz Wiczenbach
collection DOAJ
description The paper studies the mechanical properties of glass fibre reinforced polymers (GFRP) with various types and orientation of reinforcement. Analyzed specimens manufactured in the infusion process are made of polymer vinyl ester resin reinforced with glass fibres. Several samples were examined containing different plies and various fibres orientation [0, 90] or [+45, –45]. To assess the mechanical parameters of laminates, a series of experimental tests were carried out. The samples were subjected to the uniaxial tensile tests, which allowed us to obtain substitute parameters, such as modulus of elasticity or strength. After all, results from experiments were used to validate the numerical model. A computational model was developed employing ABAQUS software using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The analysis was performed to verify and compare the results obtained from numerical calculations with the experiments. Additionally, the following failure criteria were studied, based on the index of failure IF Maximum Stress, Maximum Strain, Tsai–Hill, and Tsai–Wu. The results confirmed the assumptions made for the footbridge's design purpose, which is made using examined material. Moreover, comparing the experimental and numerical results found that in the linear-elastic range of the material, they are consistent, and there is no significant difference in results.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:14:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df731f5d98e348fca60ffaec205830f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2300-3103
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:14:51Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Polish Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Archives of Civil Engineering
spelling doaj.art-df731f5d98e348fca60ffaec205830f92022-12-22T02:49:00ZengPolish Academy of SciencesArchives of Civil Engineering2300-31032021-09-01vol. 67No 3525541https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.138069Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminatesTomasz Wiczenbach0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8482-0580Tomasz Ferenc1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-7570Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 GdańskGdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 GdańskThe paper studies the mechanical properties of glass fibre reinforced polymers (GFRP) with various types and orientation of reinforcement. Analyzed specimens manufactured in the infusion process are made of polymer vinyl ester resin reinforced with glass fibres. Several samples were examined containing different plies and various fibres orientation [0, 90] or [+45, –45]. To assess the mechanical parameters of laminates, a series of experimental tests were carried out. The samples were subjected to the uniaxial tensile tests, which allowed us to obtain substitute parameters, such as modulus of elasticity or strength. After all, results from experiments were used to validate the numerical model. A computational model was developed employing ABAQUS software using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The analysis was performed to verify and compare the results obtained from numerical calculations with the experiments. Additionally, the following failure criteria were studied, based on the index of failure IF Maximum Stress, Maximum Strain, Tsai–Hill, and Tsai–Wu. The results confirmed the assumptions made for the footbridge's design purpose, which is made using examined material. Moreover, comparing the experimental and numerical results found that in the linear-elastic range of the material, they are consistent, and there is no significant difference in results.https://journals.pan.pl/Content/120656/30_ACE-00008_A4.pdfcomposite structurefailure criteriagfrp laminateunidirectional testvalidation
spellingShingle Tomasz Wiczenbach
Tomasz Ferenc
Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
Archives of Civil Engineering
composite structure
failure criteria
gfrp laminate
unidirectional test
validation
title Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
title_full Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
title_fullStr Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
title_full_unstemmed Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
title_short Tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various GFRP laminates
title_sort tensile validation tests with failure criteria comparison for various gfrp laminates
topic composite structure
failure criteria
gfrp laminate
unidirectional test
validation
url https://journals.pan.pl/Content/120656/30_ACE-00008_A4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszwiczenbach tensilevalidationtestswithfailurecriteriacomparisonforvariousgfrplaminates
AT tomaszferenc tensilevalidationtestswithfailurecriteriacomparisonforvariousgfrplaminates