Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI),...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742 |
_version_ | 1797517383964819456 |
---|---|
author | Yu Wang Md. Arfan Ali Muhammad Bilal Zhongfeng Qiu Alaa Mhawish Mansour Almazroui Shamsuddin Shahid M. Nazrul Islam Yuanzhi Zhang Md. Nazmul Haque |
author_facet | Yu Wang Md. Arfan Ali Muhammad Bilal Zhongfeng Qiu Alaa Mhawish Mansour Almazroui Shamsuddin Shahid M. Nazrul Islam Yuanzhi Zhang Md. Nazmul Haque |
author_sort | Yu Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), total column nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>), and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) were used from 2005 to 2020 to identify pollution hotspots and potential source areas responsible for air pollution in Jiangsu Province. The study investigated the spatiotemporal distribution and variability of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, the SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and their trends, and potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis was performed to identify potential source areas. The spatial distributions showed higher values (>0.60 DU) of annual mean NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> for most cities of Jiangsu Province except for Yancheng City (<0.50 DU). The seasonal analyses showed the highest NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter, followed by spring, autumn, and summer. Coal-fire-based room heating and stable meteorological conditions during the cold season may cause higher NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter. Notably, the occurrence frequency of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> of >1.2 was highest in winter, which varied between 9.14~32.46% for NO<sub>2</sub> and 7.84~21.67% for SO<sub>2</sub>, indicating a high level of pollution across Jiangsu Province. The high SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio (>0.60) indicated that industry is the dominant source, with significant annual and seasonal variations. Trends in NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were calculated for 2005–2020, 2006–2010 (when China introduced strict air pollution control policies during the 11th Five Year Plan (FYP)), 2011–2015 (during the 12th FYP), and 2013–2017 (the Action Plan of Air Pollution Prevention and Control (APPC-AC)). Annually, decreasing trends in NO<sub>2</sub> were more prominent during the 12th FYP period (2011–2015: −0.024~−0.052 DU/year) than in the APPC-AC period (2013–2017: −0.007~−0.043 DU/year) and 2005–2020 (−0.002 to −0.012 DU/year). However, no prevention and control policies for NO<sub>2</sub> were included during the 11th FYP period (2006–2010), resulting in an increasing trend in NO<sub>2</sub> (0.015 to 0.031) observed throughout the study area. Furthermore, the implementation of China’s strict air pollution control policies caused a larger decrease in SO<sub>2</sub> (per year) during the 12th FYP period (−0.002~−0.075 DU/year) than in the 11th FYP period (−0.014~−0.071 DU/year), the APPC-AC period (−0.007~−0.043 DU/year), and 2005–2020 (−0.015~−0.032 DU/year). PSCF analysis indicated that the air quality of Jiangsu Province is mainly influenced by local pollution sources. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:14:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-df77b549127c4933809040953bd5ad19 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2072-4292 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:14:52Z |
publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Remote Sensing |
spelling | doaj.art-df77b549127c4933809040953bd5ad192023-11-22T15:07:39ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-09-011318374210.3390/rs13183742Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of ChinaYu Wang0Md. Arfan Ali1Muhammad Bilal2Zhongfeng Qiu3Alaa Mhawish4Mansour Almazroui5Shamsuddin Shahid6M. Nazrul Islam7Yuanzhi Zhang8Md. Nazmul Haque9Lab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Excellence for Climate Change Research, Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Water and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, MalaysiaCenter of Excellence for Climate Change Research, Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning (URP), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna 9203, BangladeshNitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), total column nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>), and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) were used from 2005 to 2020 to identify pollution hotspots and potential source areas responsible for air pollution in Jiangsu Province. The study investigated the spatiotemporal distribution and variability of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, the SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and their trends, and potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis was performed to identify potential source areas. The spatial distributions showed higher values (>0.60 DU) of annual mean NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> for most cities of Jiangsu Province except for Yancheng City (<0.50 DU). The seasonal analyses showed the highest NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter, followed by spring, autumn, and summer. Coal-fire-based room heating and stable meteorological conditions during the cold season may cause higher NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter. Notably, the occurrence frequency of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> of >1.2 was highest in winter, which varied between 9.14~32.46% for NO<sub>2</sub> and 7.84~21.67% for SO<sub>2</sub>, indicating a high level of pollution across Jiangsu Province. The high SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio (>0.60) indicated that industry is the dominant source, with significant annual and seasonal variations. Trends in NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were calculated for 2005–2020, 2006–2010 (when China introduced strict air pollution control policies during the 11th Five Year Plan (FYP)), 2011–2015 (during the 12th FYP), and 2013–2017 (the Action Plan of Air Pollution Prevention and Control (APPC-AC)). Annually, decreasing trends in NO<sub>2</sub> were more prominent during the 12th FYP period (2011–2015: −0.024~−0.052 DU/year) than in the APPC-AC period (2013–2017: −0.007~−0.043 DU/year) and 2005–2020 (−0.002 to −0.012 DU/year). However, no prevention and control policies for NO<sub>2</sub> were included during the 11th FYP period (2006–2010), resulting in an increasing trend in NO<sub>2</sub> (0.015 to 0.031) observed throughout the study area. Furthermore, the implementation of China’s strict air pollution control policies caused a larger decrease in SO<sub>2</sub> (per year) during the 12th FYP period (−0.002~−0.075 DU/year) than in the 11th FYP period (−0.014~−0.071 DU/year), the APPC-AC period (−0.007~−0.043 DU/year), and 2005–2020 (−0.015~−0.032 DU/year). PSCF analysis indicated that the air quality of Jiangsu Province is mainly influenced by local pollution sources.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742OMINO<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratioJiangsu Provincetrend |
spellingShingle | Yu Wang Md. Arfan Ali Muhammad Bilal Zhongfeng Qiu Alaa Mhawish Mansour Almazroui Shamsuddin Shahid M. Nazrul Islam Yuanzhi Zhang Md. Nazmul Haque Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China Remote Sensing OMI NO<sub>2</sub> SO<sub>2</sub> SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio Jiangsu Province trend |
title | Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China |
title_full | Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China |
title_fullStr | Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China |
title_short | Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China |
title_sort | identification of no sub 2 sub and so sub 2 sub pollution hotspots and sources in jiangsu province of china |
topic | OMI NO<sub>2</sub> SO<sub>2</sub> SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio Jiangsu Province trend |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuwang identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT mdarfanali identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT muhammadbilal identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT zhongfengqiu identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT alaamhawish identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT mansouralmazroui identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT shamsuddinshahid identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT mnazrulislam identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT yuanzhizhang identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina AT mdnazmulhaque identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina |