Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China

Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Wang, Md. Arfan Ali, Muhammad Bilal, Zhongfeng Qiu, Alaa Mhawish, Mansour Almazroui, Shamsuddin Shahid, M. Nazrul Islam, Yuanzhi Zhang, Md. Nazmul Haque
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742
_version_ 1797517383964819456
author Yu Wang
Md. Arfan Ali
Muhammad Bilal
Zhongfeng Qiu
Alaa Mhawish
Mansour Almazroui
Shamsuddin Shahid
M. Nazrul Islam
Yuanzhi Zhang
Md. Nazmul Haque
author_facet Yu Wang
Md. Arfan Ali
Muhammad Bilal
Zhongfeng Qiu
Alaa Mhawish
Mansour Almazroui
Shamsuddin Shahid
M. Nazrul Islam
Yuanzhi Zhang
Md. Nazmul Haque
author_sort Yu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), total column nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>), and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) were used from 2005 to 2020 to identify pollution hotspots and potential source areas responsible for air pollution in Jiangsu Province. The study investigated the spatiotemporal distribution and variability of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, the SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and their trends, and potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis was performed to identify potential source areas. The spatial distributions showed higher values (>0.60 DU) of annual mean NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> for most cities of Jiangsu Province except for Yancheng City (<0.50 DU). The seasonal analyses showed the highest NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter, followed by spring, autumn, and summer. Coal-fire-based room heating and stable meteorological conditions during the cold season may cause higher NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter. Notably, the occurrence frequency of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> of >1.2 was highest in winter, which varied between 9.14~32.46% for NO<sub>2</sub> and 7.84~21.67% for SO<sub>2</sub>, indicating a high level of pollution across Jiangsu Province. The high SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio (>0.60) indicated that industry is the dominant source, with significant annual and seasonal variations. Trends in NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were calculated for 2005–2020, 2006–2010 (when China introduced strict air pollution control policies during the 11th Five Year Plan (FYP)), 2011–2015 (during the 12th FYP), and 2013–2017 (the Action Plan of Air Pollution Prevention and Control (APPC-AC)). Annually, decreasing trends in NO<sub>2</sub> were more prominent during the 12th FYP period (2011–2015: −0.024~−0.052 DU/year) than in the APPC-AC period (2013–2017: −0.007~−0.043 DU/year) and 2005–2020 (−0.002 to −0.012 DU/year). However, no prevention and control policies for NO<sub>2</sub> were included during the 11th FYP period (2006–2010), resulting in an increasing trend in NO<sub>2</sub> (0.015 to 0.031) observed throughout the study area. Furthermore, the implementation of China’s strict air pollution control policies caused a larger decrease in SO<sub>2</sub> (per year) during the 12th FYP period (−0.002~−0.075 DU/year) than in the 11th FYP period (−0.014~−0.071 DU/year), the APPC-AC period (−0.007~−0.043 DU/year), and 2005–2020 (−0.015~−0.032 DU/year). PSCF analysis indicated that the air quality of Jiangsu Province is mainly influenced by local pollution sources.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:14:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df77b549127c4933809040953bd5ad19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:14:52Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-df77b549127c4933809040953bd5ad192023-11-22T15:07:39ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-09-011318374210.3390/rs13183742Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of ChinaYu Wang0Md. Arfan Ali1Muhammad Bilal2Zhongfeng Qiu3Alaa Mhawish4Mansour Almazroui5Shamsuddin Shahid6M. Nazrul Islam7Yuanzhi Zhang8Md. Nazmul Haque9Lab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Excellence for Climate Change Research, Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Water and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, MalaysiaCenter of Excellence for Climate Change Research, Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaLab of Environmental Remote Sensing (LERS), School of Marine Sciences (SMS), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, ChinaDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning (URP), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna 9203, BangladeshNitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) are important atmospheric trace gases for determining air quality, human health, climate change, and ecological conditions both regionally and globally. In this study, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), total column nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>), and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) were used from 2005 to 2020 to identify pollution hotspots and potential source areas responsible for air pollution in Jiangsu Province. The study investigated the spatiotemporal distribution and variability of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>, the SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and their trends, and potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis was performed to identify potential source areas. The spatial distributions showed higher values (>0.60 DU) of annual mean NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> for most cities of Jiangsu Province except for Yancheng City (<0.50 DU). The seasonal analyses showed the highest NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter, followed by spring, autumn, and summer. Coal-fire-based room heating and stable meteorological conditions during the cold season may cause higher NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> in winter. Notably, the occurrence frequency of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> of >1.2 was highest in winter, which varied between 9.14~32.46% for NO<sub>2</sub> and 7.84~21.67% for SO<sub>2</sub>, indicating a high level of pollution across Jiangsu Province. The high SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio (>0.60) indicated that industry is the dominant source, with significant annual and seasonal variations. Trends in NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> were calculated for 2005–2020, 2006–2010 (when China introduced strict air pollution control policies during the 11th Five Year Plan (FYP)), 2011–2015 (during the 12th FYP), and 2013–2017 (the Action Plan of Air Pollution Prevention and Control (APPC-AC)). Annually, decreasing trends in NO<sub>2</sub> were more prominent during the 12th FYP period (2011–2015: −0.024~−0.052 DU/year) than in the APPC-AC period (2013–2017: −0.007~−0.043 DU/year) and 2005–2020 (−0.002 to −0.012 DU/year). However, no prevention and control policies for NO<sub>2</sub> were included during the 11th FYP period (2006–2010), resulting in an increasing trend in NO<sub>2</sub> (0.015 to 0.031) observed throughout the study area. Furthermore, the implementation of China’s strict air pollution control policies caused a larger decrease in SO<sub>2</sub> (per year) during the 12th FYP period (−0.002~−0.075 DU/year) than in the 11th FYP period (−0.014~−0.071 DU/year), the APPC-AC period (−0.007~−0.043 DU/year), and 2005–2020 (−0.015~−0.032 DU/year). PSCF analysis indicated that the air quality of Jiangsu Province is mainly influenced by local pollution sources.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742OMINO<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratioJiangsu Provincetrend
spellingShingle Yu Wang
Md. Arfan Ali
Muhammad Bilal
Zhongfeng Qiu
Alaa Mhawish
Mansour Almazroui
Shamsuddin Shahid
M. Nazrul Islam
Yuanzhi Zhang
Md. Nazmul Haque
Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
Remote Sensing
OMI
NO<sub>2</sub>
SO<sub>2</sub>
SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio
Jiangsu Province
trend
title Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
title_full Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
title_fullStr Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
title_full_unstemmed Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
title_short Identification of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> Pollution Hotspots and Sources in Jiangsu Province of China
title_sort identification of no sub 2 sub and so sub 2 sub pollution hotspots and sources in jiangsu province of china
topic OMI
NO<sub>2</sub>
SO<sub>2</sub>
SO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub>2</sub> ratio
Jiangsu Province
trend
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/18/3742
work_keys_str_mv AT yuwang identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT mdarfanali identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT muhammadbilal identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT zhongfengqiu identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT alaamhawish identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT mansouralmazroui identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT shamsuddinshahid identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT mnazrulislam identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT yuanzhizhang identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina
AT mdnazmulhaque identificationofnosub2subandsosub2subpollutionhotspotsandsourcesinjiangsuprovinceofchina