A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation

Abstract Background There is a major paradigm shift for intraoperative mechanical ventilator support by the introduction of lung protective ventilation strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve overall clinical outcomes in non-thoracic surgeries. However, there is curren...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chuan-Yi Kuo, Ying-Tung Liu, Tzu-Shan Chen, Chen-Fuh Lam, Ming-Cheng Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-01157-w
_version_ 1818267117267451904
author Chuan-Yi Kuo
Ying-Tung Liu
Tzu-Shan Chen
Chen-Fuh Lam
Ming-Cheng Wu
author_facet Chuan-Yi Kuo
Ying-Tung Liu
Tzu-Shan Chen
Chen-Fuh Lam
Ming-Cheng Wu
author_sort Chuan-Yi Kuo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is a major paradigm shift for intraoperative mechanical ventilator support by the introduction of lung protective ventilation strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve overall clinical outcomes in non-thoracic surgeries. However, there is currently a lack of standardized practice guideline for lung protection during thoracic surgeries that require one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study aimed to collect the expert opinions of the thoracic anesthesiologists in perioperative care for OLV surgery in Taiwan. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in 16 tertiary hospitals in Taiwan from January to February 2019. A structured survey form was distributed across the participating hospitals and the thoracic anesthesiologists were invited to complete the form voluntarily. The survey form consisted of three parts, including the basic information of the institutional anesthesia care standards, ventilatory settings for a proposed patient receiving OLV surgery and expert opinions on OLV. Results A total of 71 thoracic anesthesiologists responded to the survey. Double-lumen tubes are the most commonly used (93.8%) airway devices for OLV. The most commonly recommended ventilator setting during OLV is a tidal volume of 6–7 ml/kg PBW (67.6%) and a PEEP level of 4–6 cmH2O (73.5%). Dual controlled ventilator modes are used by 44.1% of the anesthesiologists. During OLV, high oxygen fraction (FiO2 > 0.8) is more commonly supplemented to achieve an oxygen saturation higher than 94%. The consensus of anesthesiologists on the indices for lung protection in thoracic surgery is considerably low. Large majority of the anesthesiologists (91.5%) highly recommend that an international clinical practice guideline on the protective lung ventilation strategy for thoracic anesthesia should be established. Conclusions This study found that the thoracic anesthesiologists in Taiwan share certain common practices in ventilator support during OLV. However, they are concerned about the lack of fundamental clinical evidences to support the beneficial outcomes of the current lung protective strategies applicable to OLV. Large-scale trials are needed to form an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for thoracic anesthesia.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T20:17:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df7ae3e99e804155ae4b11d8c401e915
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T20:17:30Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-df7ae3e99e804155ae4b11d8c401e9152022-12-22T00:13:20ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532020-09-012011910.1186/s12871-020-01157-wA nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilationChuan-Yi Kuo0Ying-Tung Liu1Tzu-Shan Chen2Chen-Fuh Lam3Ming-Cheng Wu4Department of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital and E-Da Cancer HospitalDivision of Respiratory Care, E-Da Hospital and E-Da Cancer HospitalDepartment of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital and E-Da Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital and E-Da Cancer HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital and E-Da Cancer HospitalAbstract Background There is a major paradigm shift for intraoperative mechanical ventilator support by the introduction of lung protective ventilation strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve overall clinical outcomes in non-thoracic surgeries. However, there is currently a lack of standardized practice guideline for lung protection during thoracic surgeries that require one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study aimed to collect the expert opinions of the thoracic anesthesiologists in perioperative care for OLV surgery in Taiwan. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in 16 tertiary hospitals in Taiwan from January to February 2019. A structured survey form was distributed across the participating hospitals and the thoracic anesthesiologists were invited to complete the form voluntarily. The survey form consisted of three parts, including the basic information of the institutional anesthesia care standards, ventilatory settings for a proposed patient receiving OLV surgery and expert opinions on OLV. Results A total of 71 thoracic anesthesiologists responded to the survey. Double-lumen tubes are the most commonly used (93.8%) airway devices for OLV. The most commonly recommended ventilator setting during OLV is a tidal volume of 6–7 ml/kg PBW (67.6%) and a PEEP level of 4–6 cmH2O (73.5%). Dual controlled ventilator modes are used by 44.1% of the anesthesiologists. During OLV, high oxygen fraction (FiO2 > 0.8) is more commonly supplemented to achieve an oxygen saturation higher than 94%. The consensus of anesthesiologists on the indices for lung protection in thoracic surgery is considerably low. Large majority of the anesthesiologists (91.5%) highly recommend that an international clinical practice guideline on the protective lung ventilation strategy for thoracic anesthesia should be established. Conclusions This study found that the thoracic anesthesiologists in Taiwan share certain common practices in ventilator support during OLV. However, they are concerned about the lack of fundamental clinical evidences to support the beneficial outcomes of the current lung protective strategies applicable to OLV. Large-scale trials are needed to form an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for thoracic anesthesia.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-01157-wAirway managementLung protective ventilationOne-lung ventilationPostoperative pain managementThoracic anesthesia
spellingShingle Chuan-Yi Kuo
Ying-Tung Liu
Tzu-Shan Chen
Chen-Fuh Lam
Ming-Cheng Wu
A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
BMC Anesthesiology
Airway management
Lung protective ventilation
One-lung ventilation
Postoperative pain management
Thoracic anesthesia
title A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
title_full A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
title_fullStr A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
title_full_unstemmed A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
title_short A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
title_sort nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one lung ventilation in taiwan time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation
topic Airway management
Lung protective ventilation
One-lung ventilation
Postoperative pain management
Thoracic anesthesia
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-01157-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chuanyikuo anationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT yingtungliu anationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT tzushanchen anationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT chenfuhlam anationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT mingchengwu anationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT chuanyikuo nationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT yingtungliu nationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT tzushanchen nationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT chenfuhlam nationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation
AT mingchengwu nationwidesurveyofintraoperativemanagementforonelungventilationintaiwantimetoaccountablefordiversityinprotectivelungventilation