Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis

Background: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K V. Guru Charan Karthik, B Indira Padmaja, N Suresh Babu, J Haritha, M Nikhil, K Shanthi Priya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=298;epage=302;aulast=Karthik
_version_ 1811331304055111680
author K V. Guru Charan Karthik
B Indira Padmaja
N Suresh Babu
J Haritha
M Nikhil
K Shanthi Priya
author_facet K V. Guru Charan Karthik
B Indira Padmaja
N Suresh Babu
J Haritha
M Nikhil
K Shanthi Priya
author_sort K V. Guru Charan Karthik
collection DOAJ
description Background: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla recedes changing the position of anterior border. Materials and Methods: In this study, 100 dentulous subjects were divided into two groups (males and females) with 50 in each group. Maxillary alginate impressions were made and base poured using levelling instrument to standardize all casts and surveyed on the surveyor for uniformity of the casts. The measured distances were analyzed using Student t-test analysis. Results: The ovoid arch was the commonest arch form found in both males and females with slightly more prevalent in females. Analysis was done using Student t-test analysis and found that the mean distance from CI-IP was found to be at 12.85 mm and 12.39 mm in males and females, respectively. Conclusion: When square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the total sample mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of square arch form was less than that of total sample with greater significance (P < 0.05). When ovoid arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of ovoid arch form was greater than that of square arch form with greatest significance (P = 0).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:18:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df87271a7d374a5da145d340f37784ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-4863
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:18:35Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj.art-df87271a7d374a5da145d340f37784ba2022-12-22T02:40:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632020-01-019129830210.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_19Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesisK V. Guru Charan KarthikB Indira PadmajaN Suresh BabuJ HarithaM NikhilK Shanthi PriyaBackground: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla recedes changing the position of anterior border. Materials and Methods: In this study, 100 dentulous subjects were divided into two groups (males and females) with 50 in each group. Maxillary alginate impressions were made and base poured using levelling instrument to standardize all casts and surveyed on the surveyor for uniformity of the casts. The measured distances were analyzed using Student t-test analysis. Results: The ovoid arch was the commonest arch form found in both males and females with slightly more prevalent in females. Analysis was done using Student t-test analysis and found that the mean distance from CI-IP was found to be at 12.85 mm and 12.39 mm in males and females, respectively. Conclusion: When square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the total sample mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of square arch form was less than that of total sample with greater significance (P < 0.05). When ovoid arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of ovoid arch form was greater than that of square arch form with greatest significance (P = 0).http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=298;epage=302;aulast=Karthikarch formscentral incisorci-ip distanceincisive papilla
spellingShingle K V. Guru Charan Karthik
B Indira Padmaja
N Suresh Babu
J Haritha
M Nikhil
K Shanthi Priya
Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
arch forms
central incisor
ci-ip distance
incisive papilla
title Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_full Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_fullStr Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_short Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_sort evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
topic arch forms
central incisor
ci-ip distance
incisive papilla
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=298;epage=302;aulast=Karthik
work_keys_str_mv AT kvgurucharankarthik evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT bindirapadmaja evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT nsureshbabu evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT jharitha evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT mnikhil evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT kshanthipriya evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis