Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery

Introduction Cataract is still one of the most common causes of visual impairment worldwide. Phacoemulsification is the primary method for cataract surgery in developed countries. However, it is associated with high cost and small incision cataract surgery (SICS), which has become an alternative sur...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mohammed S Ahmed
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:English
Publicado em: General Organization of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes 2021-01-01
coleção:Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:http://www.jmsr.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2537-091X;year=2021;volume=4;issue=3;spage=240;epage=243;aulast=Ahmed
_version_ 1827298661326913536
author Mohammed S Ahmed
author_facet Mohammed S Ahmed
author_sort Mohammed S Ahmed
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Cataract is still one of the most common causes of visual impairment worldwide. Phacoemulsification is the primary method for cataract surgery in developed countries. However, it is associated with high cost and small incision cataract surgery (SICS), which has become an alternative surgery for phacoemulsification, mostly in developing countries. Patients and methods This study was carried out aiming to compare the effectiveness [postoperative visual acuity (VA)] of phacoemulsification versus SICS. Four hundred and fifty cataract patients, allocated into two groups with no statistically significant differences in their basic characteristics, were included in the current study. Patients in the first group underwent phacoemulsification and those in the second group underwent SICS; patients were followed up for 28 days. Results This study revealed no statistically significant differences between the phacoemulsification and SICS groups in visual outcome or proportion of patients with normal vision at follow-up. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were found between both methods in the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications. The effectiveness of phacoemulsification and SICS in improving VA was found to be similar. SICS should be considered for more frequent use in high-volume mass cataract surgery. Conclusion In conclusion, SICS has comparable effectiveness with phacoemulsification in improving VA and should be considered in developing countries and rural areas.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:19:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfa3d2f55a194cd0b83c095ebb2dcee6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2537-091X
2537-0928
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:19:42Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher General Organization of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes
record_format Article
series Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research
spelling doaj.art-dfa3d2f55a194cd0b83c095ebb2dcee62024-04-02T08:35:30ZengGeneral Organization of Teaching Hospitals and InstitutesJournal of Medicine in Scientific Research2537-091X2537-09282021-01-014324024310.4103/jmisr.jmisr_131_20Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgeryMohammed S AhmedIntroduction Cataract is still one of the most common causes of visual impairment worldwide. Phacoemulsification is the primary method for cataract surgery in developed countries. However, it is associated with high cost and small incision cataract surgery (SICS), which has become an alternative surgery for phacoemulsification, mostly in developing countries. Patients and methods This study was carried out aiming to compare the effectiveness [postoperative visual acuity (VA)] of phacoemulsification versus SICS. Four hundred and fifty cataract patients, allocated into two groups with no statistically significant differences in their basic characteristics, were included in the current study. Patients in the first group underwent phacoemulsification and those in the second group underwent SICS; patients were followed up for 28 days. Results This study revealed no statistically significant differences between the phacoemulsification and SICS groups in visual outcome or proportion of patients with normal vision at follow-up. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were found between both methods in the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications. The effectiveness of phacoemulsification and SICS in improving VA was found to be similar. SICS should be considered for more frequent use in high-volume mass cataract surgery. Conclusion In conclusion, SICS has comparable effectiveness with phacoemulsification in improving VA and should be considered in developing countries and rural areas.http://www.jmsr.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2537-091X;year=2021;volume=4;issue=3;spage=240;epage=243;aulast=Ahmedcataractphacoemulsificationsmall incision cataract surgery
spellingShingle Mohammed S Ahmed
Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research
cataract
phacoemulsification
small incision cataract surgery
title Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
title_full Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
title_fullStr Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
title_short Comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
title_sort comparative study between the visual outcome of phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery
topic cataract
phacoemulsification
small incision cataract surgery
url http://www.jmsr.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2537-091X;year=2021;volume=4;issue=3;spage=240;epage=243;aulast=Ahmed
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedsahmed comparativestudybetweenthevisualoutcomeofphacoemulsificationandsmallincisioncataractsurgery