Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: Many of the discussions surrounding Open Access (OA) revolve around how it affects publishing practices across different academic disciplines. It was a long-held view that it would be only a matter of time before all disciplines fully and relatively homogeneously implemented OA. Recent l...
Main Authors: | Anna Severin, Matthias Egger, Martin Paul Eve, Daniel Hürlimann |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2020-03-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1925/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Memory in the digital age [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Silvana Mandolessi
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Autonomous, bidding, credible, decentralized, ethical, and funded (ABCDEF) publishing [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Kyoshiro Sasaki, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Cellular agriculture in the UK: a review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Open Science Training in TRIPLE [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Lottie Provost, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)