Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China

Grazing impacts soil enzyme activities by changing soil conditions and microbial functions. Yet, the specific effects of grazing on soil enzymes in different northeastern China forest-steppe vegetation types remain poorly understood. To examine this, catalase (CA), urease (UA), and cellulase (CEA) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Long Wang, Zhiqing Jia, Qingxue Li, Lingxianzi He, Jiapeng Tian, Wei Ding, Tao Liu, Ya Gao, Jiapeng Zhang, Dong Han, Hui Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/12/2292
_version_ 1797381083820457984
author Long Wang
Zhiqing Jia
Qingxue Li
Lingxianzi He
Jiapeng Tian
Wei Ding
Tao Liu
Ya Gao
Jiapeng Zhang
Dong Han
Hui Tian
author_facet Long Wang
Zhiqing Jia
Qingxue Li
Lingxianzi He
Jiapeng Tian
Wei Ding
Tao Liu
Ya Gao
Jiapeng Zhang
Dong Han
Hui Tian
author_sort Long Wang
collection DOAJ
description Grazing impacts soil enzyme activities by changing soil conditions and microbial functions. Yet, the specific effects of grazing on soil enzymes in different northeastern China forest-steppe vegetation types remain poorly understood. To examine this, catalase (CA), urease (UA), and cellulase (CEA) activities were measured in different vegetation types (NS, MF, CP, GL) under both grazing and non-grazing conditions. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC and MBN) and other soil factors were also studied to gauge their impact on enzyme activities. The results indicated that enzyme activities were influenced by grazing, soil nutrient levels, mineralization, and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content. Grazing exerted the most significant influence on UA. CEA was predominantly affected by the content of biomass nitrogen and soil mineralization. CA, on the other hand, was primarily influenced by soil nutrient levels. Grazing influenced enzyme activities differently based on vegetation type. Under grazing, CA showed higher values in NS, MF, CP, and GL (4.09, 2.42, 3.26, and 3.90 mL 0.1 mol L<sup>−1</sup> KMnO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup> soil 20 min<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) with increases ranging from 32.52% to 505.00% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, UA values were significantly higher in MF and CP (0.24 and 0.59 mg NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N g<sup>−1</sup> soil d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) with increases of 66.67% and 156.00%, while UA and CEA were lower in GL, showing reductions of 78.79% and 166.67% (<i>p</i> < 0.05) (0.33 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N g<sup>−1</sup> soil d<sup>−1</sup> and 0.06 mg glucose g<sup>−1</sup> soil 72 h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) under grazing conditions. These findings underscore the importance of vegetation types in the grazing effects on soil enzymes at the forest-steppe ecotone and suggest that further efforts should be made to strengthen grassland grazing management to mitigate negative impacts on soil environmental health.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:46:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfb17fd750794d5da14b1462ea1231fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:46:11Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-dfb17fd750794d5da14b1462ea1231fc2023-12-22T14:09:16ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072023-11-011412229210.3390/f14122292Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern ChinaLong Wang0Zhiqing Jia1Qingxue Li2Lingxianzi He3Jiapeng Tian4Wei Ding5Tao Liu6Ya Gao7Jiapeng Zhang8Dong Han9Hui Tian10Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaQinghai Gonghe Desert Ecosystem and Research Station, Gonghe 813005, ChinaQinghai Gonghe Desert Ecosystem and Research Station, Gonghe 813005, ChinaInner Mongolia Baiyin Obo Forest Farm, Chifeng 025369, ChinaInner Mongolia Baiyin Obo Forest Farm, Chifeng 025369, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaResearch Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaGrazing impacts soil enzyme activities by changing soil conditions and microbial functions. Yet, the specific effects of grazing on soil enzymes in different northeastern China forest-steppe vegetation types remain poorly understood. To examine this, catalase (CA), urease (UA), and cellulase (CEA) activities were measured in different vegetation types (NS, MF, CP, GL) under both grazing and non-grazing conditions. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen (MBC and MBN) and other soil factors were also studied to gauge their impact on enzyme activities. The results indicated that enzyme activities were influenced by grazing, soil nutrient levels, mineralization, and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content. Grazing exerted the most significant influence on UA. CEA was predominantly affected by the content of biomass nitrogen and soil mineralization. CA, on the other hand, was primarily influenced by soil nutrient levels. Grazing influenced enzyme activities differently based on vegetation type. Under grazing, CA showed higher values in NS, MF, CP, and GL (4.09, 2.42, 3.26, and 3.90 mL 0.1 mol L<sup>−1</sup> KMnO<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup> soil 20 min<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) with increases ranging from 32.52% to 505.00% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, UA values were significantly higher in MF and CP (0.24 and 0.59 mg NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N g<sup>−1</sup> soil d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) with increases of 66.67% and 156.00%, while UA and CEA were lower in GL, showing reductions of 78.79% and 166.67% (<i>p</i> < 0.05) (0.33 NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N g<sup>−1</sup> soil d<sup>−1</sup> and 0.06 mg glucose g<sup>−1</sup> soil 72 h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) under grazing conditions. These findings underscore the importance of vegetation types in the grazing effects on soil enzymes at the forest-steppe ecotone and suggest that further efforts should be made to strengthen grassland grazing management to mitigate negative impacts on soil environmental health.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/12/2292grazing effectscatalaseureasecellulasemicrobial biomass
spellingShingle Long Wang
Zhiqing Jia
Qingxue Li
Lingxianzi He
Jiapeng Tian
Wei Ding
Tao Liu
Ya Gao
Jiapeng Zhang
Dong Han
Hui Tian
Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
Forests
grazing effects
catalase
urease
cellulase
microbial biomass
title Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
title_full Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
title_fullStr Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
title_full_unstemmed Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
title_short Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China
title_sort grazing impacts on soil enzyme activities vary with vegetation types in the forest steppe ecotone of northeastern china
topic grazing effects
catalase
urease
cellulase
microbial biomass
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/12/2292
work_keys_str_mv AT longwang grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT zhiqingjia grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT qingxueli grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT lingxianzihe grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT jiapengtian grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT weiding grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT taoliu grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT yagao grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT jiapengzhang grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT donghan grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina
AT huitian grazingimpactsonsoilenzymeactivitiesvarywithvegetationtypesintheforeststeppeecotoneofnortheasternchina