Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists

Abstract Background Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (COPs) can assess and manage musculoskeletal conditions with similar manual or physical therapy techniques. This overlap in scope of practice raises questions about the boundaries between the three professions. Clinical settings wher...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua Toloui-Wallace, Roma Forbes, Oliver P. Thomson, Nathalia Costa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10738-1
_version_ 1797259461118656512
author Joshua Toloui-Wallace
Roma Forbes
Oliver P. Thomson
Nathalia Costa
author_facet Joshua Toloui-Wallace
Roma Forbes
Oliver P. Thomson
Nathalia Costa
author_sort Joshua Toloui-Wallace
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (COPs) can assess and manage musculoskeletal conditions with similar manual or physical therapy techniques. This overlap in scope of practice raises questions about the boundaries between the three professions. Clinical settings where they are co-located are one of several possible influences on professional boundaries and may provide insight into the nature of these boundaries and how they are managed by clinicians themselves. Objectives To understand the nature of professional boundaries between COPs within a co-located clinical environment and describe the ways in which professional boundaries may be reinforced, weakened, or navigated in this environment. Methods Drawing from an interpretivist paradigm, we used ethnographic observations to observe interactions between 15 COPs across two clinics. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis principles. Results We identified various physical and non-physical ‘boundary objects’ that influenced the nature of the professional boundaries between the COPs that participated in the study. These boundary objects overall seemed to increase the fluidity of the professional boundaries, at times simultaneously reinforcing and weakening them. The boundary objects were categorised into three themes: physical, including the clinic’s floor plan, large and small objects; social, including identities and discourse; and organisational, including appointment durations and fees, remuneration policies and insurance benefits. Conclusions Physical, social, organisational related factors made the nature of professional boundaries between COPs in these settings fluid; meaning that they were largely not rigid or fixed but rather flexible, responsive and subject to change. These findings may challenge patients, clinicians and administrators to appreciate that traditional beliefs of distinct boundaries between COPs may not be so in co-located clinical environments. Both clinical practice and future research on professional boundaries between COPs may need to further consider some of these broader factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:09:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfc3d5a15da647c598409ab7c945271a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:09:47Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-dfc3d5a15da647c598409ab7c945271a2024-03-17T12:19:56ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632024-03-0124111310.1186/s12913-024-10738-1Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapistsJoshua Toloui-Wallace0Roma Forbes1Oliver P. Thomson2Nathalia Costa3School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of QueenslandSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of QueenslandUniversity College of OsteopathySchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of QueenslandAbstract Background Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (COPs) can assess and manage musculoskeletal conditions with similar manual or physical therapy techniques. This overlap in scope of practice raises questions about the boundaries between the three professions. Clinical settings where they are co-located are one of several possible influences on professional boundaries and may provide insight into the nature of these boundaries and how they are managed by clinicians themselves. Objectives To understand the nature of professional boundaries between COPs within a co-located clinical environment and describe the ways in which professional boundaries may be reinforced, weakened, or navigated in this environment. Methods Drawing from an interpretivist paradigm, we used ethnographic observations to observe interactions between 15 COPs across two clinics. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis principles. Results We identified various physical and non-physical ‘boundary objects’ that influenced the nature of the professional boundaries between the COPs that participated in the study. These boundary objects overall seemed to increase the fluidity of the professional boundaries, at times simultaneously reinforcing and weakening them. The boundary objects were categorised into three themes: physical, including the clinic’s floor plan, large and small objects; social, including identities and discourse; and organisational, including appointment durations and fees, remuneration policies and insurance benefits. Conclusions Physical, social, organisational related factors made the nature of professional boundaries between COPs in these settings fluid; meaning that they were largely not rigid or fixed but rather flexible, responsive and subject to change. These findings may challenge patients, clinicians and administrators to appreciate that traditional beliefs of distinct boundaries between COPs may not be so in co-located clinical environments. Both clinical practice and future research on professional boundaries between COPs may need to further consider some of these broader factors.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10738-1Physical therapistsOsteopathic medicineChiropracticMusculoskeletal manipulationsInterprofessional relations
spellingShingle Joshua Toloui-Wallace
Roma Forbes
Oliver P. Thomson
Nathalia Costa
Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
BMC Health Services Research
Physical therapists
Osteopathic medicine
Chiropractic
Musculoskeletal manipulations
Interprofessional relations
title Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
title_full Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
title_fullStr Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
title_full_unstemmed Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
title_short Fluid professional boundaries: ethnographic observations of co-located chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
title_sort fluid professional boundaries ethnographic observations of co located chiropractors osteopaths and physiotherapists
topic Physical therapists
Osteopathic medicine
Chiropractic
Musculoskeletal manipulations
Interprofessional relations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10738-1
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuatolouiwallace fluidprofessionalboundariesethnographicobservationsofcolocatedchiropractorsosteopathsandphysiotherapists
AT romaforbes fluidprofessionalboundariesethnographicobservationsofcolocatedchiropractorsosteopathsandphysiotherapists
AT oliverpthomson fluidprofessionalboundariesethnographicobservationsofcolocatedchiropractorsosteopathsandphysiotherapists
AT nathaliacosta fluidprofessionalboundariesethnographicobservationsofcolocatedchiropractorsosteopathsandphysiotherapists