The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea

Objectives In this paper, we aimed to investigate the evolving debate over border closure in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to address the main themes associated with border closure, and to discuss the factors that need to be considered when making such decisions. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SuJin Kang, Jihyun Moon, Heewon Kang, Heekyoung Nam, Sangwoo Tak, Sung-Il Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-213.pdf
_version_ 1818340673105952768
author SuJin Kang
Jihyun Moon
Heewon Kang
Heekyoung Nam
Sangwoo Tak
Sung-Il Cho
author_facet SuJin Kang
Jihyun Moon
Heewon Kang
Heekyoung Nam
Sangwoo Tak
Sung-Il Cho
author_sort SuJin Kang
collection DOAJ
description Objectives In this paper, we aimed to investigate the evolving debate over border closure in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to address the main themes associated with border closure, and to discuss the factors that need to be considered when making such decisions. Methods We collated and reviewed previously conducted review studies on border closures during infectious disease outbreaks to derive relevant themes and factors. Results According to our systematic review on border closures and travel restrictions, the effects of such containment efforts are limited. We suggest considering the following factors when determining whether to impose border closure measures: (1) disease characteristics, (2) timeliness of implementation, (3) transmission delay and the basic reproduction number, (4) globalization and pandemics, and (5) social and economic costs. Conclusions Our assessment indicates that the effects of border closures are at best temporary and limited. Alternative measures must be contemplated and implemented to suppress the spread of COVID-19 in particular and infectious diseases more broadly.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:46:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfc73fbed765467c8eb0ef70ba762a03
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1975-8375
2233-4521
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:46:38Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
record_format Article
series Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
spelling doaj.art-dfc73fbed765467c8eb0ef70ba762a032022-12-21T23:39:42ZengKorean Society for Preventive MedicineJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health1975-83752233-45212020-09-0153530230610.3961/jpmph.20.2132110The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in KoreaSuJin Kang0Jihyun Moon1Heewon Kang2Heekyoung Nam3Sangwoo Tak4Sung-Il Cho5 Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaObjectives In this paper, we aimed to investigate the evolving debate over border closure in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to address the main themes associated with border closure, and to discuss the factors that need to be considered when making such decisions. Methods We collated and reviewed previously conducted review studies on border closures during infectious disease outbreaks to derive relevant themes and factors. Results According to our systematic review on border closures and travel restrictions, the effects of such containment efforts are limited. We suggest considering the following factors when determining whether to impose border closure measures: (1) disease characteristics, (2) timeliness of implementation, (3) transmission delay and the basic reproduction number, (4) globalization and pandemics, and (5) social and economic costs. Conclusions Our assessment indicates that the effects of border closures are at best temporary and limited. Alternative measures must be contemplated and implemented to suppress the spread of COVID-19 in particular and infectious diseases more broadly.http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-213.pdfcovid-19 pandemicinfectious diseasescontrol measurepolicyborder closure
spellingShingle SuJin Kang
Jihyun Moon
Heewon Kang
Heekyoung Nam
Sangwoo Tak
Sung-Il Cho
The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
covid-19 pandemic
infectious diseases
control measure
policy
border closure
title The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
title_full The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
title_fullStr The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
title_full_unstemmed The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
title_short The Evolving Policy Debate on Border Closure in Korea
title_sort evolving policy debate on border closure in korea
topic covid-19 pandemic
infectious diseases
control measure
policy
border closure
url http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-20-213.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sujinkang theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT jihyunmoon theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT heewonkang theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT heekyoungnam theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT sangwootak theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT sungilcho theevolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT sujinkang evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT jihyunmoon evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT heewonkang evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT heekyoungnam evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT sangwootak evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea
AT sungilcho evolvingpolicydebateonborderclosureinkorea