Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration
The European Union (EU) is facing one of the rockiest periods in its existence. At no time in its history has it looked so economically fragile, so insecure about how to protect its borders, so divided over how to tackle the crisis of legitimacy facing its institutions, and so under assault by Euro...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of International Relations Prague
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Czech Journal of International Relations |
| Online Access: | https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/64 |
| _version_ | 1797875966088839168 |
|---|---|
| author | Jan Kovář |
| author_facet | Jan Kovář |
| author_sort | Jan Kovář |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The European Union (EU) is facing one of the rockiest periods in its
existence. At no time in its history has it looked so economically fragile, so
insecure about how to protect its borders, so divided over how to tackle the
crisis of legitimacy facing its institutions, and so under assault by
Eurosceptic parties. The unprecedented levels of integration in recent
decades have led to increased public contestation, yet at the same the EU is
more reliant on public support for its continued legitimacy than ever
before. This book examines the role of public opinion in the European
integration process. It develops a novel theory of public opinion that
stresses the deep interconnectedness between people’s views about
European and national politics. It suggests that public opinion cannot
simply be characterized as either Eurosceptic or not, but rather that it
consists of different types. This is important because these types coincide
with fundamentally different views about the way the EU should be
reformed and which policy priorities should be pursued. These types also
have very different consequences for behaviour in elections and
referendums. Euroscepticism is such a diverse phenomenon because the
Eurozone crisis has exacerbated the structural imbalances within the EU. As
the economic and political fates of member states have diverged, people’s
experiences with and evaluations of the EU and national political systems
have also grown further apart. The heterogeneity in public preferences that
this book has uncovered makes a one-size-fits-all approach to addressing
Euroscepticism unlikely to be successful.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:55:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dfc9ddb18bf4493fb3b94dd7f2f9ab69 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0323-1844 2570-9429 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:55:55Z |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | Institute of International Relations Prague |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Czech Journal of International Relations |
| spelling | doaj.art-dfc9ddb18bf4493fb3b94dd7f2f9ab692023-03-13T08:54:12ZengInstitute of International Relations PragueCzech Journal of International Relations0323-18442570-94292021-03-01561Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European IntegrationJan Kovář0Institute of International Relations, Prague, Czech Republic The European Union (EU) is facing one of the rockiest periods in its existence. At no time in its history has it looked so economically fragile, so insecure about how to protect its borders, so divided over how to tackle the crisis of legitimacy facing its institutions, and so under assault by Eurosceptic parties. The unprecedented levels of integration in recent decades have led to increased public contestation, yet at the same the EU is more reliant on public support for its continued legitimacy than ever before. This book examines the role of public opinion in the European integration process. It develops a novel theory of public opinion that stresses the deep interconnectedness between people’s views about European and national politics. It suggests that public opinion cannot simply be characterized as either Eurosceptic or not, but rather that it consists of different types. This is important because these types coincide with fundamentally different views about the way the EU should be reformed and which policy priorities should be pursued. These types also have very different consequences for behaviour in elections and referendums. Euroscepticism is such a diverse phenomenon because the Eurozone crisis has exacerbated the structural imbalances within the EU. As the economic and political fates of member states have diverged, people’s experiences with and evaluations of the EU and national political systems have also grown further apart. The heterogeneity in public preferences that this book has uncovered makes a one-size-fits-all approach to addressing Euroscepticism unlikely to be successful. https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/64 |
| spellingShingle | Jan Kovář Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration Czech Journal of International Relations |
| title | Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration |
| title_full | Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration |
| title_fullStr | Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration |
| title_short | Catherine E. de Vries: Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration |
| title_sort | catherine e de vries euroscepticism and the future of european integration |
| url | https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/64 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jankovar catherineedevrieseuroscepticismandthefutureofeuropeanintegration |