Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major healthcare burden, aggravated when it extends to multiple drugs. While cross-resistance is well-studied experimentally, it is not the case in clinical settings, and especially not while considering confounding. Here, we estimated patterns of cr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stacey S. Cherny, Michal Chowers, Uri Obolski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-05-01
Series:Communications Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00289-7
_version_ 1827952621485293568
author Stacey S. Cherny
Michal Chowers
Uri Obolski
author_facet Stacey S. Cherny
Michal Chowers
Uri Obolski
author_sort Stacey S. Cherny
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major healthcare burden, aggravated when it extends to multiple drugs. While cross-resistance is well-studied experimentally, it is not the case in clinical settings, and especially not while considering confounding. Here, we estimated patterns of cross-resistance from clinical samples, while controlling for multiple clinical confounders and stratifying by sample sources. Methods We employed additive Bayesian network (ABN) modelling to examine antibiotic cross- resistance in five major bacterial species, obtained from different sources (urine, wound, blood, and sputum) in a clinical setting, collected in a large hospital in Israel over a 4-year period. Overall, the number of samples available were 3525 for E coli, 1125 for K pneumoniae, 1828 for P aeruginosa, 701 for P mirabilis, and 835 for S aureus. Results Patterns of cross-resistance differ across sample sources. All identified links between resistance to different antibiotics are positive. However, in 15 of 18 instances, the magnitudes of the links are significantly different between sources. For example, E coli exhibits adjusted odds ratios of gentamicin-ofloxacin cross-resistance ranging from 3.0 (95%CI [2.3,4.0]) in urine samples to 11.0 (95%CI [5.2,26.1]) in blood samples. Furthermore, we found that for P mirabilis, the magnitude of cross-resistance among linked antibiotics is higher in urine than in wound samples, whereas the opposite is true for K pneumoniae and P aeruginosa. Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of considering sample sources when assessing likelihood of antibiotic cross-resistance. The information and methods described in our study can refine future estimation of cross-resistance patterns and facilitate determination of antibiotic treatment regimens.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:00:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfcdded941e74b029128b9376a95d308
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2730-664X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:00:30Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Medicine
spelling doaj.art-dfcdded941e74b029128b9376a95d3082023-05-07T11:22:01ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Medicine2730-664X2023-05-01311710.1038/s43856-023-00289-7Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample sourceStacey S. Cherny0Michal Chowers1Uri Obolski2School of Public Health, Tel Aviv UniversityMeir Medical CenterSchool of Public Health, Tel Aviv UniversityAbstract Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major healthcare burden, aggravated when it extends to multiple drugs. While cross-resistance is well-studied experimentally, it is not the case in clinical settings, and especially not while considering confounding. Here, we estimated patterns of cross-resistance from clinical samples, while controlling for multiple clinical confounders and stratifying by sample sources. Methods We employed additive Bayesian network (ABN) modelling to examine antibiotic cross- resistance in five major bacterial species, obtained from different sources (urine, wound, blood, and sputum) in a clinical setting, collected in a large hospital in Israel over a 4-year period. Overall, the number of samples available were 3525 for E coli, 1125 for K pneumoniae, 1828 for P aeruginosa, 701 for P mirabilis, and 835 for S aureus. Results Patterns of cross-resistance differ across sample sources. All identified links between resistance to different antibiotics are positive. However, in 15 of 18 instances, the magnitudes of the links are significantly different between sources. For example, E coli exhibits adjusted odds ratios of gentamicin-ofloxacin cross-resistance ranging from 3.0 (95%CI [2.3,4.0]) in urine samples to 11.0 (95%CI [5.2,26.1]) in blood samples. Furthermore, we found that for P mirabilis, the magnitude of cross-resistance among linked antibiotics is higher in urine than in wound samples, whereas the opposite is true for K pneumoniae and P aeruginosa. Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of considering sample sources when assessing likelihood of antibiotic cross-resistance. The information and methods described in our study can refine future estimation of cross-resistance patterns and facilitate determination of antibiotic treatment regimens.https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00289-7
spellingShingle Stacey S. Cherny
Michal Chowers
Uri Obolski
Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
Communications Medicine
title Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
title_full Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
title_fullStr Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
title_short Bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross-resistance by bacterial sample source
title_sort bayesian network modeling of patterns of antibiotic cross resistance by bacterial sample source
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00289-7
work_keys_str_mv AT staceyscherny bayesiannetworkmodelingofpatternsofantibioticcrossresistancebybacterialsamplesource
AT michalchowers bayesiannetworkmodelingofpatternsofantibioticcrossresistancebybacterialsamplesource
AT uriobolski bayesiannetworkmodelingofpatternsofantibioticcrossresistancebybacterialsamplesource