Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms

This study aimed to elucidate the role of psychological factors in caregiver burden among caregivers of stage 4 cancer patients. Data were collected from 328 caregivers of cancer patients, employing the Zarit Care Burden Scale, Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS-42), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ipek Özönder Ünal, Cetin Ordu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/19/2700
_version_ 1797575851981668352
author Ipek Özönder Ünal
Cetin Ordu
author_facet Ipek Özönder Ünal
Cetin Ordu
author_sort Ipek Özönder Ünal
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to elucidate the role of psychological factors in caregiver burden among caregivers of stage 4 cancer patients. Data were collected from 328 caregivers of cancer patients, employing the Zarit Care Burden Scale, Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS-42), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-A), Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTSQ), and Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE). Males, spouses, and caregivers of patients with a PEG or tracheostomy, or those diagnosed with pancreatic biliary cancer were found to have a significantly higher risk of caregiver burden. Age, sex, caregiver-patient relationship, caregiving duration, patient’s catheter status, cancer types, depression and stress severity, rumination, dysfunctional attitudes, and dysfunctional coping strategies explained 69.7% of the variance in Zarit Care Burden Scale scores (F(14,313) = 51.457, <i>p</i> < 0.001), illustrating their significant predictive relationship with caregiver burden. Moderation analysis revealed significant interactions of emotional coping with depression (b = −0.0524, <i>p</i> = 0.0076) and dysfunctional coping with stress on caregiver burden (b = 0.014, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Furthermore, rumination mediated the relationships between caregiver burden, stress, and depression (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Overall, the results highlight the intricate relationships among caregiver burden, mental health, and coping strategies, suggesting tailored interventions to support caregiver health and quality of care.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:45:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfdda6b85a8d423a924f684ff9c99ef0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:45:10Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-dfdda6b85a8d423a924f684ff9c99ef02023-11-19T14:26:02ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322023-10-011119270010.3390/healthcare11192700Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping MechanismsIpek Özönder Ünal0Cetin Ordu1Department of Psychiatry, Tuzla State Hospital, Içmeler Mahallesi, Piri Reis Caddesi, No: 74 Tuzla, Istanbul 34947, TurkeyDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Cemil Aslan Güder Sk. No: 8, Beşiktaş, Istanbul 34349, TurkeyThis study aimed to elucidate the role of psychological factors in caregiver burden among caregivers of stage 4 cancer patients. Data were collected from 328 caregivers of cancer patients, employing the Zarit Care Burden Scale, Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS-42), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-A), Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTSQ), and Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE). Males, spouses, and caregivers of patients with a PEG or tracheostomy, or those diagnosed with pancreatic biliary cancer were found to have a significantly higher risk of caregiver burden. Age, sex, caregiver-patient relationship, caregiving duration, patient’s catheter status, cancer types, depression and stress severity, rumination, dysfunctional attitudes, and dysfunctional coping strategies explained 69.7% of the variance in Zarit Care Burden Scale scores (F(14,313) = 51.457, <i>p</i> < 0.001), illustrating their significant predictive relationship with caregiver burden. Moderation analysis revealed significant interactions of emotional coping with depression (b = −0.0524, <i>p</i> = 0.0076) and dysfunctional coping with stress on caregiver burden (b = 0.014, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Furthermore, rumination mediated the relationships between caregiver burden, stress, and depression (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Overall, the results highlight the intricate relationships among caregiver burden, mental health, and coping strategies, suggesting tailored interventions to support caregiver health and quality of care.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/19/2700cancercaregiver burdencoping strategiesdepressionrumination
spellingShingle Ipek Özönder Ünal
Cetin Ordu
Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
Healthcare
cancer
caregiver burden
coping strategies
depression
rumination
title Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
title_full Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
title_fullStr Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
title_short Decoding Caregiver Burden in Cancer: Role of Emotional Health, Rumination, and Coping Mechanisms
title_sort decoding caregiver burden in cancer role of emotional health rumination and coping mechanisms
topic cancer
caregiver burden
coping strategies
depression
rumination
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/19/2700
work_keys_str_mv AT ipekozonderunal decodingcaregiverburdenincancerroleofemotionalhealthruminationandcopingmechanisms
AT cetinordu decodingcaregiverburdenincancerroleofemotionalhealthruminationandcopingmechanisms