Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia

Abstract Objective: To establish population estimates of self‐assessed tooth loss and subjective oral health and describe the social distribution of these measures among dentate adults in Australia. Methods: Self‐report data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 3,678 adults aged...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne E. Sanders, A. John Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2004-04-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.x
_version_ 1827935770218856448
author Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
author_facet Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
author_sort Anne E. Sanders
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: To establish population estimates of self‐assessed tooth loss and subjective oral health and describe the social distribution of these measures among dentate adults in Australia. Methods: Self‐report data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 3,678 adults aged 18–91 years who participated in the 1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey and completed a subsequent mail survey. Oral health was evaluated using (1) self‐assessed tooth loss, (2) the 14‐item Oral Health Impact Profile, and (3) a global six‐point rating of oral health. Results: While the absolute difference in tooth loss across household income levels increased at each successive age group (18–44 years, 45–64 years, 65+ years) from 0.7 teeth to 6.1 teeth, the magnitude of the difference was approximately twofold at each age group. For subjective oral health measures, the magnitude of difference across income groups was most pronounced in the 18–44 years age group. In multivariate analysis, low household income, blue‐collar occupation, and high residential area disadvantage were positively associated with social impact from oral conditions and pathological tooth loss. Speaking other than English at home (relative to English), low household income (relative to high income), and vocational relative to tertiary education were each associated with more than twice the odds of poor self‐rated oral health. Conclusions: Significant social differentials in perceived oral health exist among dentate adults. Inequalities span the socio‐economic hierarchy. Implications: In addition to improving overall levels of oral health in the adult community, goals and targets should aim to reduce social inequalities in the distribution of outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:59:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfde9f61fda0410994a4b7c5f91fc761
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:59:36Z
publishDate 2004-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-dfde9f61fda0410994a4b7c5f91fc7612023-06-02T00:04:16ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052004-04-0128215916610.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.xSocial Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in AustraliaAnne E. Sanders0A. John Spencer1Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South AustraliaAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South AustraliaAbstract Objective: To establish population estimates of self‐assessed tooth loss and subjective oral health and describe the social distribution of these measures among dentate adults in Australia. Methods: Self‐report data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 3,678 adults aged 18–91 years who participated in the 1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey and completed a subsequent mail survey. Oral health was evaluated using (1) self‐assessed tooth loss, (2) the 14‐item Oral Health Impact Profile, and (3) a global six‐point rating of oral health. Results: While the absolute difference in tooth loss across household income levels increased at each successive age group (18–44 years, 45–64 years, 65+ years) from 0.7 teeth to 6.1 teeth, the magnitude of the difference was approximately twofold at each age group. For subjective oral health measures, the magnitude of difference across income groups was most pronounced in the 18–44 years age group. In multivariate analysis, low household income, blue‐collar occupation, and high residential area disadvantage were positively associated with social impact from oral conditions and pathological tooth loss. Speaking other than English at home (relative to English), low household income (relative to high income), and vocational relative to tertiary education were each associated with more than twice the odds of poor self‐rated oral health. Conclusions: Significant social differentials in perceived oral health exist among dentate adults. Inequalities span the socio‐economic hierarchy. Implications: In addition to improving overall levels of oral health in the adult community, goals and targets should aim to reduce social inequalities in the distribution of outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.x
spellingShingle Anne E. Sanders
A. John Spencer
Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
title Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
title_full Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
title_fullStr Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
title_short Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
title_sort social inequality social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in australia
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.x
work_keys_str_mv AT anneesanders socialinequalitysocialinequalityinperceivedoralhealthamongadultsinaustralia
AT ajohnspencer socialinequalitysocialinequalityinperceivedoralhealthamongadultsinaustralia