Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery

Abstract Accurate and timely inland waterbody extent and location data are foundational information to support a variety of hydrological applications and water resources management. Recently, the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) has emerged as a promising tool for delineating inla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. K. Pavur, H. Kim, B. Fang, V. Lakshmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-03-01
Series:Geoscience Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-024-00321-1
_version_ 1797266804860518400
author G. K. Pavur
H. Kim
B. Fang
V. Lakshmi
author_facet G. K. Pavur
H. Kim
B. Fang
V. Lakshmi
author_sort G. K. Pavur
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Accurate and timely inland waterbody extent and location data are foundational information to support a variety of hydrological applications and water resources management. Recently, the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) has emerged as a promising tool for delineating inland water due to distinct surface reflectivity characteristics over dry versus wet land which are observable by CYGNSS’s eight microsatellites with passive bistatic radars that acquire reflected L-band signals from the Global Positioning System (GPS) (i.e., signals of opportunity). This study conducts a baseline 1-km comparison of water masks for the contiguous United States between latitudes of 24°N-37°N for 2019 using three Earth observation systems: CYGNSS (i.e., our baseline water mask data), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (i.e., land water mask data), and the Landsat Global Surface Water product (i.e., Pekel data). Spatial performance of the 1-km comparison water mask was assessed using confusion matrix statistics and optical high-resolution commercial satellite imagery. When a mosaic of binary thresholds for 8 sub-basins for CYGNSS data were employed, confusion matrix statistics were improved such as up to a 34% increase in F1-score. Further, a performance metric of ratio of inland water to catchment area showed that inland water area estimates from CYGNSS, MODIS, and Landsat were within 2.3% of each other regardless of the sub-basin observed. Overall, this study provides valuable insight into the spatial similarities and discrepancies of inland water masks derived from optical (visible) versus radar (Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry, GNSS-R) based satellite Earth observations.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:06:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dfea9751d84d4abaa18abcb833f6d44c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-4092
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:06:31Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Geoscience Letters
spelling doaj.art-dfea9751d84d4abaa18abcb833f6d44c2024-03-10T12:14:16ZengSpringerOpenGeoscience Letters2196-40922024-03-0111111310.1186/s40562-024-00321-1Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imageryG. K. Pavur0H. Kim1B. Fang2V. Lakshmi3School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of VirginiaSchool of Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and TechnologySchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of VirginiaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of VirginiaAbstract Accurate and timely inland waterbody extent and location data are foundational information to support a variety of hydrological applications and water resources management. Recently, the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) has emerged as a promising tool for delineating inland water due to distinct surface reflectivity characteristics over dry versus wet land which are observable by CYGNSS’s eight microsatellites with passive bistatic radars that acquire reflected L-band signals from the Global Positioning System (GPS) (i.e., signals of opportunity). This study conducts a baseline 1-km comparison of water masks for the contiguous United States between latitudes of 24°N-37°N for 2019 using three Earth observation systems: CYGNSS (i.e., our baseline water mask data), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (i.e., land water mask data), and the Landsat Global Surface Water product (i.e., Pekel data). Spatial performance of the 1-km comparison water mask was assessed using confusion matrix statistics and optical high-resolution commercial satellite imagery. When a mosaic of binary thresholds for 8 sub-basins for CYGNSS data were employed, confusion matrix statistics were improved such as up to a 34% increase in F1-score. Further, a performance metric of ratio of inland water to catchment area showed that inland water area estimates from CYGNSS, MODIS, and Landsat were within 2.3% of each other regardless of the sub-basin observed. Overall, this study provides valuable insight into the spatial similarities and discrepancies of inland water masks derived from optical (visible) versus radar (Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry, GNSS-R) based satellite Earth observations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-024-00321-1CYGNSSInland waterWater maskSatellite Earth observationsMODISLandsat
spellingShingle G. K. Pavur
H. Kim
B. Fang
V. Lakshmi
Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
Geoscience Letters
CYGNSS
Inland water
Water mask
Satellite Earth observations
MODIS
Landsat
title Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
title_full Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
title_fullStr Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
title_full_unstemmed Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
title_short Spatial comparison of inland water observations from CYGNSS, MODIS, Landsat, and commercial satellite imagery
title_sort spatial comparison of inland water observations from cygnss modis landsat and commercial satellite imagery
topic CYGNSS
Inland water
Water mask
Satellite Earth observations
MODIS
Landsat
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-024-00321-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gkpavur spatialcomparisonofinlandwaterobservationsfromcygnssmodislandsatandcommercialsatelliteimagery
AT hkim spatialcomparisonofinlandwaterobservationsfromcygnssmodislandsatandcommercialsatelliteimagery
AT bfang spatialcomparisonofinlandwaterobservationsfromcygnssmodislandsatandcommercialsatelliteimagery
AT vlakshmi spatialcomparisonofinlandwaterobservationsfromcygnssmodislandsatandcommercialsatelliteimagery