Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriate...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302 |
_version_ | 1797984343369449472 |
---|---|
author | Gillian Ray-Barruel Jennifer Horowitz Elizabeth McLaughlin Scott Flanders Vineet Chopra |
author_facet | Gillian Ray-Barruel Jennifer Horowitz Elizabeth McLaughlin Scott Flanders Vineet Chopra |
author_sort | Gillian Ray-Barruel |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. Participating hospitals received an online toolkit with five recommendations: establishing a vascular access committee; implementing a clinical decision tool for PICC appropriateness; avoiding short-term PICC use (≤5 days); increasing use of single-lumen PICCs; and avoiding PICC placement in patients with chronic kidney disease. Longitudinal online surveys conducted biannually October 2014-November 2018 tracked implementation efforts. A total of 306 unique surveys from 34 hospitals were completed. The proportion of hospitals with a dedicated committee overseeing PICC appropriateness increased from 53% to 97%. Overall, 94% of hospitals implemented an initiative to reduce short-term and multi-lumen PICC use, and 91% integrated kidney function into PICC placement decisions. Barriers to implementation included: achieving agreement from diverse disciplines, competing hospital priorities, and delays in modifying electronic systems to enable appropriate PICC ordering. Provision of quarterly benchmarking reports, a decision algorithm, access to an online toolkit, and presence of local champion support were cited as crucial in improving practice. Structured quality improvement efforts including a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions, and support from an online education toolkit have led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:00:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-dff0891711414bf4bfd9a431cef2c7ec |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:00:35Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-dff0891711414bf4bfd9a431cef2c7ec2022-12-22T04:38:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027730210.1371/journal.pone.0277302Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.Gillian Ray-BarruelJennifer HorowitzElizabeth McLaughlinScott FlandersVineet ChopraPeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. Participating hospitals received an online toolkit with five recommendations: establishing a vascular access committee; implementing a clinical decision tool for PICC appropriateness; avoiding short-term PICC use (≤5 days); increasing use of single-lumen PICCs; and avoiding PICC placement in patients with chronic kidney disease. Longitudinal online surveys conducted biannually October 2014-November 2018 tracked implementation efforts. A total of 306 unique surveys from 34 hospitals were completed. The proportion of hospitals with a dedicated committee overseeing PICC appropriateness increased from 53% to 97%. Overall, 94% of hospitals implemented an initiative to reduce short-term and multi-lumen PICC use, and 91% integrated kidney function into PICC placement decisions. Barriers to implementation included: achieving agreement from diverse disciplines, competing hospital priorities, and delays in modifying electronic systems to enable appropriate PICC ordering. Provision of quarterly benchmarking reports, a decision algorithm, access to an online toolkit, and presence of local champion support were cited as crucial in improving practice. Structured quality improvement efforts including a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions, and support from an online education toolkit have led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302 |
spellingShingle | Gillian Ray-Barruel Jennifer Horowitz Elizabeth McLaughlin Scott Flanders Vineet Chopra Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. PLoS ONE |
title | Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals. |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter picc appropriateness guidelines a longitudinal survey study from 34 michigan hospitals |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillianraybarruel barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals AT jenniferhorowitz barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals AT elizabethmclaughlin barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals AT scottflanders barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals AT vineetchopra barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals |