Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gillian Ray-Barruel, Jennifer Horowitz, Elizabeth McLaughlin, Scott Flanders, Vineet Chopra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302
_version_ 1797984343369449472
author Gillian Ray-Barruel
Jennifer Horowitz
Elizabeth McLaughlin
Scott Flanders
Vineet Chopra
author_facet Gillian Ray-Barruel
Jennifer Horowitz
Elizabeth McLaughlin
Scott Flanders
Vineet Chopra
author_sort Gillian Ray-Barruel
collection DOAJ
description Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. Participating hospitals received an online toolkit with five recommendations: establishing a vascular access committee; implementing a clinical decision tool for PICC appropriateness; avoiding short-term PICC use (≤5 days); increasing use of single-lumen PICCs; and avoiding PICC placement in patients with chronic kidney disease. Longitudinal online surveys conducted biannually October 2014-November 2018 tracked implementation efforts. A total of 306 unique surveys from 34 hospitals were completed. The proportion of hospitals with a dedicated committee overseeing PICC appropriateness increased from 53% to 97%. Overall, 94% of hospitals implemented an initiative to reduce short-term and multi-lumen PICC use, and 91% integrated kidney function into PICC placement decisions. Barriers to implementation included: achieving agreement from diverse disciplines, competing hospital priorities, and delays in modifying electronic systems to enable appropriate PICC ordering. Provision of quarterly benchmarking reports, a decision algorithm, access to an online toolkit, and presence of local champion support were cited as crucial in improving practice. Structured quality improvement efforts including a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions, and support from an online education toolkit have led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:00:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dff0891711414bf4bfd9a431cef2c7ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:00:35Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-dff0891711414bf4bfd9a431cef2c7ec2022-12-22T04:38:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027730210.1371/journal.pone.0277302Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.Gillian Ray-BarruelJennifer HorowitzElizabeth McLaughlinScott FlandersVineet ChopraPeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are prevalent devices for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy but are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-center study sought to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. Participating hospitals received an online toolkit with five recommendations: establishing a vascular access committee; implementing a clinical decision tool for PICC appropriateness; avoiding short-term PICC use (≤5 days); increasing use of single-lumen PICCs; and avoiding PICC placement in patients with chronic kidney disease. Longitudinal online surveys conducted biannually October 2014-November 2018 tracked implementation efforts. A total of 306 unique surveys from 34 hospitals were completed. The proportion of hospitals with a dedicated committee overseeing PICC appropriateness increased from 53% to 97%. Overall, 94% of hospitals implemented an initiative to reduce short-term and multi-lumen PICC use, and 91% integrated kidney function into PICC placement decisions. Barriers to implementation included: achieving agreement from diverse disciplines, competing hospital priorities, and delays in modifying electronic systems to enable appropriate PICC ordering. Provision of quarterly benchmarking reports, a decision algorithm, access to an online toolkit, and presence of local champion support were cited as crucial in improving practice. Structured quality improvement efforts including a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions, and support from an online education toolkit have led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302
spellingShingle Gillian Ray-Barruel
Jennifer Horowitz
Elizabeth McLaughlin
Scott Flanders
Vineet Chopra
Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
PLoS ONE
title Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
title_full Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
title_short Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.
title_sort barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter picc appropriateness guidelines a longitudinal survey study from 34 michigan hospitals
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277302
work_keys_str_mv AT gillianraybarruel barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals
AT jenniferhorowitz barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals
AT elizabethmclaughlin barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals
AT scottflanders barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals
AT vineetchopra barriersandfacilitatorsforimplementingperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterpiccappropriatenessguidelinesalongitudinalsurveystudyfrom34michiganhospitals