Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures

Abstract Introduction Traditionally, operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents has been achieved by using a plate and screws. However, a minimally invasive trend has led surgeons to use the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) for displaced midshaft clavicle f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pan Hong, Ruikang Liu, Saroj Rai, Renhao Ze, Xin Tang, Jin Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00659-2
_version_ 1811188841081470976
author Pan Hong
Ruikang Liu
Saroj Rai
Renhao Ze
Xin Tang
Jin Li
author_facet Pan Hong
Ruikang Liu
Saroj Rai
Renhao Ze
Xin Tang
Jin Li
author_sort Pan Hong
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Traditionally, operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents has been achieved by using a plate and screws. However, a minimally invasive trend has led surgeons to use the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of adolescent patients who were operated on with an ESIN vs. a plate. Methods All patients aged between 10 and 14 years with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures who were operated on at our institute between January 2014 and January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative data, including baseline information on the patients, and types of surgical procedure were collected from the hospital database. The postoperative data, including clinical outcome and complications, were collected during the follow-up visits. Clinical outcome was evaluated during outpatient visits using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The scar problem was evaluated according to the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. Results A total of 73 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: ESIN (n = 45; 27 males, 18 females) and plate (n = 28; 17 males, 11 females), according to surgical technique. The average age of the patients in the ESIN group was 12.2 ± 1.5 years, and that in the plate group was 12.2 ± 1.4 years. The ESIN group presented significantly less operative time (31.1 vs. 59.8 min), a shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs. 2.5 days), and a smaller incision (2.4 vs. 5.4 cm) as compared to the plate group (P < .001). The rate of scar concern was much higher in the plate group (71.4%) than the ESIN group (22.2%) (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in shoulder function between the ESIN group and the plate group at different time points. Conclusion A conservative approach remains the first choice for a pediatric clavicle fracture. Both the ESIN and the plate are safe and effective treatment methods for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. The ESIN is superior to the plate given its shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, lower rate of scar concern, and easier implant removal. Level of evidence III, retrospective observational study.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dff5646f85f548f98276c3dcfa00a156
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1590-9921
1590-9999
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
spelling doaj.art-dff5646f85f548f98276c3dcfa00a1562022-12-22T04:18:54ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology1590-99211590-99992022-08-012311610.1186/s10195-022-00659-2Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fracturesPan Hong0Ruikang Liu1Saroj Rai2Renhao Ze3Xin Tang4Jin Li5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Blue Cross HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Introduction Traditionally, operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents has been achieved by using a plate and screws. However, a minimally invasive trend has led surgeons to use the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of adolescent patients who were operated on with an ESIN vs. a plate. Methods All patients aged between 10 and 14 years with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures who were operated on at our institute between January 2014 and January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative data, including baseline information on the patients, and types of surgical procedure were collected from the hospital database. The postoperative data, including clinical outcome and complications, were collected during the follow-up visits. Clinical outcome was evaluated during outpatient visits using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The scar problem was evaluated according to the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale. Results A total of 73 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: ESIN (n = 45; 27 males, 18 females) and plate (n = 28; 17 males, 11 females), according to surgical technique. The average age of the patients in the ESIN group was 12.2 ± 1.5 years, and that in the plate group was 12.2 ± 1.4 years. The ESIN group presented significantly less operative time (31.1 vs. 59.8 min), a shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs. 2.5 days), and a smaller incision (2.4 vs. 5.4 cm) as compared to the plate group (P < .001). The rate of scar concern was much higher in the plate group (71.4%) than the ESIN group (22.2%) (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in shoulder function between the ESIN group and the plate group at different time points. Conclusion A conservative approach remains the first choice for a pediatric clavicle fracture. Both the ESIN and the plate are safe and effective treatment methods for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. The ESIN is superior to the plate given its shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, lower rate of scar concern, and easier implant removal. Level of evidence III, retrospective observational study.https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00659-2Clavicle fractureAdolescentElastic stable intramedullary nail
spellingShingle Pan Hong
Ruikang Liu
Saroj Rai
Renhao Ze
Xin Tang
Jin Li
Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Clavicle fracture
Adolescent
Elastic stable intramedullary nail
title Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
title_full Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
title_fullStr Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
title_full_unstemmed Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
title_short Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
title_sort plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures
topic Clavicle fracture
Adolescent
Elastic stable intramedullary nail
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00659-2
work_keys_str_mv AT panhong platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures
AT ruikangliu platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures
AT sarojrai platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures
AT renhaoze platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures
AT xintang platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures
AT jinli platingversuselasticstableintramedullarynailingfordisplacedpediatricmidshaftclavicularfractures