Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations

Abstract Background Emergency service vehicle crashes (ESVCs) are a leading cause of death in the United States fire service. Risk management (RM) is a proactive process for identifying occupational risks and reducing hazards and unwanted events through an iterative process of scoping hazards, risk...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David P. Bui, Keshia Pollack Porter, Stephanie Griffin, Dustin D. French, Alesia M. Jung, Stephen Crothers, Jefferey L. Burgess
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4894-3
_version_ 1818975056218292224
author David P. Bui
Keshia Pollack Porter
Stephanie Griffin
Dustin D. French
Alesia M. Jung
Stephen Crothers
Jefferey L. Burgess
author_facet David P. Bui
Keshia Pollack Porter
Stephanie Griffin
Dustin D. French
Alesia M. Jung
Stephen Crothers
Jefferey L. Burgess
author_sort David P. Bui
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Emergency service vehicle crashes (ESVCs) are a leading cause of death in the United States fire service. Risk management (RM) is a proactive process for identifying occupational risks and reducing hazards and unwanted events through an iterative process of scoping hazards, risk assessment, and implementing controls. We describe the process, outputs, and lessons learned from the application of a proactive RM process to reduce ESVCs in US fire departments. Methods Three fire departments representative of urban, suburban, and rural geographies, participated in a facilitated RM process delivered through focus groups and stakeholder discussion. Crash reports from department databases were reviewed to characterize the context, circumstances, hazards and risks of ESVCs. Identified risks were ranked using a risk matrix that considered risk likelihood and severity. Department-specific control measures were selected based on group consensus. Interviews, and focus groups were used to assess acceptability and utility of the RM process and perceived facilitators and barriers of implementation. Results Three to six RM meetings were conducted at each fire department. There were 7.4 crashes per 100 personnel in the urban department and 10.5 per 100 personnel in the suburban department; the rural department experienced zero crashes. All departments identified emergency response, backing, on scene struck by, driver distraction, vehicle/road visibility, and driver training as high or medium concerns. Additional high priority risks varied by department; the urban department prioritized turning and rear ending crashes; the suburban firefighters prioritized inclement weather/road environment and low visibility related crashes; and the rural volunteer fire department prioritized exiting station, vehicle failure, and inclement weather/road environment related incidents. Selected controls included new policies and standard operating procedures to reduce emergency response, cameras to enhance driver visibility while backing, and increased training frequency and enhanced training. The RM process was generally acceptable to department participants and considered useful. All departments reported that the focused and systematic analysis of crashes was particularly helpful. Implementation of controls was a commonly cited challenge. Conclusions Proactive RM of ESVCs in three US fire departments was positively received and supported the establishment of interventions tailored to each department’s needs and priorities.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:49:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dffbbafa2f7a44a3abf5034118b3950e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:49:53Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-dffbbafa2f7a44a3abf5034118b3950e2022-12-21T19:34:45ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-11-0117111110.1186/s12889-017-4894-3Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendationsDavid P. Bui0Keshia Pollack Porter1Stephanie Griffin2Dustin D. French3Alesia M. Jung4Stephen Crothers5Jefferey L. Burgess6Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Drachman HallJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and PolicyMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Drachman HallCenter for Healthcare Studies, Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Drachman HallSeattle Fire DepartmentMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Drachman HallAbstract Background Emergency service vehicle crashes (ESVCs) are a leading cause of death in the United States fire service. Risk management (RM) is a proactive process for identifying occupational risks and reducing hazards and unwanted events through an iterative process of scoping hazards, risk assessment, and implementing controls. We describe the process, outputs, and lessons learned from the application of a proactive RM process to reduce ESVCs in US fire departments. Methods Three fire departments representative of urban, suburban, and rural geographies, participated in a facilitated RM process delivered through focus groups and stakeholder discussion. Crash reports from department databases were reviewed to characterize the context, circumstances, hazards and risks of ESVCs. Identified risks were ranked using a risk matrix that considered risk likelihood and severity. Department-specific control measures were selected based on group consensus. Interviews, and focus groups were used to assess acceptability and utility of the RM process and perceived facilitators and barriers of implementation. Results Three to six RM meetings were conducted at each fire department. There were 7.4 crashes per 100 personnel in the urban department and 10.5 per 100 personnel in the suburban department; the rural department experienced zero crashes. All departments identified emergency response, backing, on scene struck by, driver distraction, vehicle/road visibility, and driver training as high or medium concerns. Additional high priority risks varied by department; the urban department prioritized turning and rear ending crashes; the suburban firefighters prioritized inclement weather/road environment and low visibility related crashes; and the rural volunteer fire department prioritized exiting station, vehicle failure, and inclement weather/road environment related incidents. Selected controls included new policies and standard operating procedures to reduce emergency response, cameras to enhance driver visibility while backing, and increased training frequency and enhanced training. The RM process was generally acceptable to department participants and considered useful. All departments reported that the focused and systematic analysis of crashes was particularly helpful. Implementation of controls was a commonly cited challenge. Conclusions Proactive RM of ESVCs in three US fire departments was positively received and supported the establishment of interventions tailored to each department’s needs and priorities.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4894-3Risk managementFire serviceSafety and healthTraffic accidentsInjury preventionCrash prevention
spellingShingle David P. Bui
Keshia Pollack Porter
Stephanie Griffin
Dustin D. French
Alesia M. Jung
Stephen Crothers
Jefferey L. Burgess
Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
BMC Public Health
Risk management
Fire service
Safety and health
Traffic accidents
Injury prevention
Crash prevention
title Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
title_full Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
title_fullStr Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
title_short Risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the United States fire service: process, outputs, and recommendations
title_sort risk management of emergency service vehicle crashes in the united states fire service process outputs and recommendations
topic Risk management
Fire service
Safety and health
Traffic accidents
Injury prevention
Crash prevention
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4894-3
work_keys_str_mv AT davidpbui riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT keshiapollackporter riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT stephaniegriffin riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT dustindfrench riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT alesiamjung riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT stephencrothers riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations
AT jeffereylburgess riskmanagementofemergencyservicevehiclecrashesintheunitedstatesfireserviceprocessoutputsandrecommendations