Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods

<p>Tailings ponds in the Alberta oil sands region are significant sources of fugitive emissions of methane to the atmosphere, but detailed knowledge on spatial and temporal variabilities is lacking due to limitations of the methods deployed under current regulatory compliance monitoring progra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Y. You, R. M. Staebler, S. G. Moussa, J. Beck, R. L. Mittermeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1879/2021/amt-14-1879-2021.pdf
_version_ 1819143273192620032
author Y. You
Y. You
R. M. Staebler
S. G. Moussa
J. Beck
R. L. Mittermeier
author_facet Y. You
Y. You
R. M. Staebler
S. G. Moussa
J. Beck
R. L. Mittermeier
author_sort Y. You
collection DOAJ
description <p>Tailings ponds in the Alberta oil sands region are significant sources of fugitive emissions of methane to the atmosphere, but detailed knowledge on spatial and temporal variabilities is lacking due to limitations of the methods deployed under current regulatory compliance monitoring programs. To develop more robust and representative methods for quantifying fugitive emissions, three micrometeorological flux methods (eddy covariance, gradient, and inverse dispersion) were applied along with traditional flux chambers to determine fluxes over a 5-week period. Eddy covariance flux measurements provided the benchmark. A method is presented to directly calculate stability-corrected eddy diffusivities that can be applied to vertical gas profiles for gradient flux estimation. Gradient fluxes were shown to agree with eddy covariance within 18 %, while inverse dispersion model flux estimates were 30 % lower. Fluxes were shown to have only a minor diurnal cycle (15 % variability) and were weakly dependent on wind speed, air, and water surface temperatures. Flux chambers underestimated the fluxes by 64 % in this particular campaign. The results show that the larger footprint together with high temporal resolution of micrometeorological flux measurement methods may result in more robust estimates of the pond greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:23:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e01046538b8c47cbb6bc2072fd2c0f47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:23:37Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
spelling doaj.art-e01046538b8c47cbb6bc2072fd2c0f472022-12-21T18:25:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482021-03-01141879189210.5194/amt-14-1879-2021Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methodsY. You0Y. You1R. M. Staebler2S. G. Moussa3J. Beck4R. L. Mittermeier5Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Toronto, M3H 5T4, Canadanow at: Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A7, CanadaAir Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Toronto, M3H 5T4, CanadaAir Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Toronto, M3H 5T4, CanadaSuncor Energy Inc., Calgary, T2P 3Y7, CanadaAir Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Toronto, M3H 5T4, Canada<p>Tailings ponds in the Alberta oil sands region are significant sources of fugitive emissions of methane to the atmosphere, but detailed knowledge on spatial and temporal variabilities is lacking due to limitations of the methods deployed under current regulatory compliance monitoring programs. To develop more robust and representative methods for quantifying fugitive emissions, three micrometeorological flux methods (eddy covariance, gradient, and inverse dispersion) were applied along with traditional flux chambers to determine fluxes over a 5-week period. Eddy covariance flux measurements provided the benchmark. A method is presented to directly calculate stability-corrected eddy diffusivities that can be applied to vertical gas profiles for gradient flux estimation. Gradient fluxes were shown to agree with eddy covariance within 18 %, while inverse dispersion model flux estimates were 30 % lower. Fluxes were shown to have only a minor diurnal cycle (15 % variability) and were weakly dependent on wind speed, air, and water surface temperatures. Flux chambers underestimated the fluxes by 64 % in this particular campaign. The results show that the larger footprint together with high temporal resolution of micrometeorological flux measurement methods may result in more robust estimates of the pond greenhouse gas emissions.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1879/2021/amt-14-1879-2021.pdf
spellingShingle Y. You
Y. You
R. M. Staebler
S. G. Moussa
J. Beck
R. L. Mittermeier
Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
title Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
title_full Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
title_fullStr Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
title_full_unstemmed Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
title_short Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
title_sort methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
url https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1879/2021/amt-14-1879-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yyou methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods
AT yyou methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods
AT rmstaebler methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods
AT sgmoussa methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods
AT jbeck methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods
AT rlmittermeier methaneemissionsfromanoilsandstailingspondaquantitativecomparisonoffluxesderivedbydifferentmethods