Reference values of myocardial native T1 and extracellular volume in patients without structural heart disease and had negative 3T cardiac magnetic resonance adenosine stress test

Background: To establish the reference values of native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) in patients without structural heart disease and had a negative adenosine stress 3T cardiac magnetic resonance. Methods: Short-axis T1 mapping images were acquired using a modified Look-Locker inversion recover...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weerapat Kositanurit, Nonthikorn Theerasuwipakorn, Yongkasem Vorasettakarnkij, Kanokvalee Ponkanist, Chonthicha Lerdkhonsan, Monravee Tumkosit, David C. Wendell, Pairoj Chattranukulchai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-04-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235290672300012X
Description
Summary:Background: To establish the reference values of native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) in patients without structural heart disease and had a negative adenosine stress 3T cardiac magnetic resonance. Methods: Short-axis T1 mapping images were acquired using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery technique before and after administration of 0.15 mmol/kg gadobutrol to calculate both native T1 and ECV. To compare the agreement between measurement strategies, regions of interest (ROI) were drawn in all 16 segments then averaged to represent mean global native T1. Additionally, an ROI was drawn in the mid-ventricular septum on the same image to represent the mid-ventricular septal native T1. Results: Fifty-one patients (mean 65 years, 65 % women) were included. Mean global native T1 averaged from all 16 segments and a mid-ventricular septal native T1 were not significantly different (1221.2 ± 35.2 vs 1228.4 ± 43.7 ms, p = 0.21). Men had lower mean global native T1 (1195 ± 29.8 vs 1235.5 ± 29.4 ms, p < 0.001) than women. Both mean global and mid-ventricular septal native T1 were not correlated with age (r = 0.21, p = 0.13 and r = 0.18, p = 0.19, respectively). The calculated ECV was 26.6 ± 2.7 %, which was not influenced by either gender or age. Conclusions: We report the first study to validate the native T1 and ECV reference ranges, factors influencing T1, and the validation across measurement methods in older Asian patients without structural heart disease and had a negative adenosine stress test. These references allow for better detection of abnormal myocardial tissue characteristics in clinical practice.
ISSN:2352-9067