Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies

Abstract Commonly used materials constituting the core components of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), including the balance‐of‐plant, were classified according to the EU criticality methodology with an additional assessment of hazardousness and price. A life‐cycle assessment (LCA) o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rok Stropnik, Andrej Lotrič, Alfonso Bernad Montenegro, Mihael Sekavčnik, Mitja Mori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-12-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.441
_version_ 1811274122677714944
author Rok Stropnik
Andrej Lotrič
Alfonso Bernad Montenegro
Mihael Sekavčnik
Mitja Mori
author_facet Rok Stropnik
Andrej Lotrič
Alfonso Bernad Montenegro
Mihael Sekavčnik
Mitja Mori
author_sort Rok Stropnik
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Commonly used materials constituting the core components of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), including the balance‐of‐plant, were classified according to the EU criticality methodology with an additional assessment of hazardousness and price. A life‐cycle assessment (LCA) of the materials potentially present in PEMFC systems was performed for 1 g of each material. To demonstrate the importance of appropriate actions at the end of life (EoL) for critical materials, a LCA study of the whole life cycle for a 1‐kW PEMFC system and 20,000 operating hours was performed. In addition to the manufacturing phase, four different scenarios of hydrogen production were analyzed. In the EoL phase, recycling was used as a primary strategy, with energy extraction and landfill as the second and third. The environmental impacts for 1 g of material show that platinum group metals and precious metals have by far the largest environmental impact; therefore, it is necessary to pay special attention to these materials in the EoL phase. The LCA results for the 1‐kW PEMFC system show that in the manufacturing phase the major environmental impacts come from the fuel cell stack, where the majority of the critical materials are used. Analysis shows that only 0.75 g of platinum in the manufacturing phase contributes, on average, 60% of the total environmental impacts of the manufacturing phase. In the operating phase, environmentally sounder scenarios are the hydrogen production with water electrolysis using hydroelectricity and natural gas reforming. These two scenarios have lower absolute values for the environmental impact indicators, on average, compared with the manufacturing phase of the 1‐kW PEMFC system. With proper recycling strategies in the EoL phase for each material, and by paying a lot of attention to the critical materials, the environmental impacts could be reduced, on average, by 37.3% for the manufacturing phase and 23.7% for the entire life cycle of the 1‐kW PEMFC system.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:12:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0245dd0e736471c95d3cb5aa1e33866
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-0505
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:12:10Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Energy Science & Engineering
spelling doaj.art-e0245dd0e736471c95d3cb5aa1e338662022-12-22T03:12:46ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052019-12-01762519253910.1002/ese3.441Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategiesRok Stropnik0Andrej Lotrič1Alfonso Bernad Montenegro2Mihael Sekavčnik3Mitja Mori4Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Ljubljana Ljubljana SloveniaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Ljubljana Ljubljana SloveniaFoundation for the Development of New Hydrogen Technologies in Aragon P. T. Walqa. Ctra Huesca SpainFaculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Ljubljana Ljubljana SloveniaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Ljubljana Ljubljana SloveniaAbstract Commonly used materials constituting the core components of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), including the balance‐of‐plant, were classified according to the EU criticality methodology with an additional assessment of hazardousness and price. A life‐cycle assessment (LCA) of the materials potentially present in PEMFC systems was performed for 1 g of each material. To demonstrate the importance of appropriate actions at the end of life (EoL) for critical materials, a LCA study of the whole life cycle for a 1‐kW PEMFC system and 20,000 operating hours was performed. In addition to the manufacturing phase, four different scenarios of hydrogen production were analyzed. In the EoL phase, recycling was used as a primary strategy, with energy extraction and landfill as the second and third. The environmental impacts for 1 g of material show that platinum group metals and precious metals have by far the largest environmental impact; therefore, it is necessary to pay special attention to these materials in the EoL phase. The LCA results for the 1‐kW PEMFC system show that in the manufacturing phase the major environmental impacts come from the fuel cell stack, where the majority of the critical materials are used. Analysis shows that only 0.75 g of platinum in the manufacturing phase contributes, on average, 60% of the total environmental impacts of the manufacturing phase. In the operating phase, environmentally sounder scenarios are the hydrogen production with water electrolysis using hydroelectricity and natural gas reforming. These two scenarios have lower absolute values for the environmental impact indicators, on average, compared with the manufacturing phase of the 1‐kW PEMFC system. With proper recycling strategies in the EoL phase for each material, and by paying a lot of attention to the critical materials, the environmental impacts could be reduced, on average, by 37.3% for the manufacturing phase and 23.7% for the entire life cycle of the 1‐kW PEMFC system.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.441critical materialsend of lifelife‐cycle assessmentPEM fuel cellsrecycling
spellingShingle Rok Stropnik
Andrej Lotrič
Alfonso Bernad Montenegro
Mihael Sekavčnik
Mitja Mori
Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
Energy Science & Engineering
critical materials
end of life
life‐cycle assessment
PEM fuel cells
recycling
title Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
title_full Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
title_fullStr Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
title_full_unstemmed Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
title_short Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
title_sort critical materials in pemfc systems and a lca analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with eol strategies
topic critical materials
end of life
life‐cycle assessment
PEM fuel cells
recycling
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.441
work_keys_str_mv AT rokstropnik criticalmaterialsinpemfcsystemsandalcaanalysisforthepotentialreductionofenvironmentalimpactswitheolstrategies
AT andrejlotric criticalmaterialsinpemfcsystemsandalcaanalysisforthepotentialreductionofenvironmentalimpactswitheolstrategies
AT alfonsobernadmontenegro criticalmaterialsinpemfcsystemsandalcaanalysisforthepotentialreductionofenvironmentalimpactswitheolstrategies
AT mihaelsekavcnik criticalmaterialsinpemfcsystemsandalcaanalysisforthepotentialreductionofenvironmentalimpactswitheolstrategies
AT mitjamori criticalmaterialsinpemfcsystemsandalcaanalysisforthepotentialreductionofenvironmentalimpactswitheolstrategies