Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population

Abstract Background The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic questionnaire that captures health and disability-related functioning information corresponding to six major life domains: Cognition, Mobility, Self-care, Getting along, Life activities, and Pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulina Norén, Jan Karlsson, Emma Ohlsson-Nevo, Margareta Möller, Liselotte Hermansson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0
_version_ 1797850064040755200
author Paulina Norén
Jan Karlsson
Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
Margareta Möller
Liselotte Hermansson
author_facet Paulina Norén
Jan Karlsson
Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
Margareta Möller
Liselotte Hermansson
author_sort Paulina Norén
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic questionnaire that captures health and disability-related functioning information corresponding to six major life domains: Cognition, Mobility, Self-care, Getting along, Life activities, and Participation. The WHODAS 2.0 is used in a wide range of international clinical and research settings. A psychometric evaluation of WHODAS 2.0, Swedish version, in the general population is lacking, together with national reference data to enable interpretation and comparison. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish 36-item version of WHODAS 2.0 and describe the prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. The construct validity was evaluated with item-total correlation, Pearson’s correlation between the WHODAS 2.0 domains and the RAND-36 subscales, analysis of known groups by one-way ANOVA, and analysis of the factor structure by confirmatory factor analysis. Results Three thousand four hundred and eighty two adults aged 19–103 years (response rate 43%) participated. Significantly higher degrees of disability were reported by the oldest age group (≥ 80 years), adults with a low level of education, and those on sick leave. Cronbach’s alpha was from 0.84 to 0.95 for the domain scores and 0.97 for the total score. The item-scale convergent validity was satisfactory, and the item-scale discriminant validity was acceptable except for the item about sexual activity. The data partially supported the factor structure, with borderline fit indices. Conclusion The psychometric properties of the self-administered Swedish 36-item version of the WHODAS 2.0 are comparable to those of other language versions of the instrument. Data of the prevalence of disability in Swedish general population enables normative comparisons of WHODAS 2.0 scores of individuals and groups within clinical practice. The instrument has certain limitations that could be improved on in a future revision. The test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish version of WHODAS 2.0 for different somatic patient populations remain to be evaluated.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:54:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0295630e6554b05ab2a4fcbccb7952f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2509-8020
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:54:20Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
spelling doaj.art-e0295630e6554b05ab2a4fcbccb7952f2023-04-09T11:17:47ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202023-04-017111110.1186/s41687-023-00580-0Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general populationPaulina Norén0Jan Karlsson1Emma Ohlsson-Nevo2Margareta Möller3Liselotte Hermansson4University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro UniversityUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro UniversityUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro UniversityUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro UniversityUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro UniversityAbstract Background The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic questionnaire that captures health and disability-related functioning information corresponding to six major life domains: Cognition, Mobility, Self-care, Getting along, Life activities, and Participation. The WHODAS 2.0 is used in a wide range of international clinical and research settings. A psychometric evaluation of WHODAS 2.0, Swedish version, in the general population is lacking, together with national reference data to enable interpretation and comparison. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish 36-item version of WHODAS 2.0 and describe the prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population. Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. The construct validity was evaluated with item-total correlation, Pearson’s correlation between the WHODAS 2.0 domains and the RAND-36 subscales, analysis of known groups by one-way ANOVA, and analysis of the factor structure by confirmatory factor analysis. Results Three thousand four hundred and eighty two adults aged 19–103 years (response rate 43%) participated. Significantly higher degrees of disability were reported by the oldest age group (≥ 80 years), adults with a low level of education, and those on sick leave. Cronbach’s alpha was from 0.84 to 0.95 for the domain scores and 0.97 for the total score. The item-scale convergent validity was satisfactory, and the item-scale discriminant validity was acceptable except for the item about sexual activity. The data partially supported the factor structure, with borderline fit indices. Conclusion The psychometric properties of the self-administered Swedish 36-item version of the WHODAS 2.0 are comparable to those of other language versions of the instrument. Data of the prevalence of disability in Swedish general population enables normative comparisons of WHODAS 2.0 scores of individuals and groups within clinical practice. The instrument has certain limitations that could be improved on in a future revision. The test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish version of WHODAS 2.0 for different somatic patient populations remain to be evaluated.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0Disability evaluationHealth surveysPatient-reported outcome measuresRAND-36Reference valuesValidity and reliability
spellingShingle Paulina Norén
Jan Karlsson
Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
Margareta Möller
Liselotte Hermansson
Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Disability evaluation
Health surveys
Patient-reported outcome measures
RAND-36
Reference values
Validity and reliability
title Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
title_full Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
title_short Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the whodas 2 0 and prevalence of disability in a swedish general population
topic Disability evaluation
Health surveys
Patient-reported outcome measures
RAND-36
Reference values
Validity and reliability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinanoren psychometricevaluationofthewhodas20andprevalenceofdisabilityinaswedishgeneralpopulation
AT jankarlsson psychometricevaluationofthewhodas20andprevalenceofdisabilityinaswedishgeneralpopulation
AT emmaohlssonnevo psychometricevaluationofthewhodas20andprevalenceofdisabilityinaswedishgeneralpopulation
AT margaretamoller psychometricevaluationofthewhodas20andprevalenceofdisabilityinaswedishgeneralpopulation
AT liselottehermansson psychometricevaluationofthewhodas20andprevalenceofdisabilityinaswedishgeneralpopulation