Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)

The paper presents outcomes of an empirical study aimed at identifying the determinants that influence the preservation of the research agenda in a sci entific school by its followers.The study was carried out on the material of U.V.Ulyenkova’s school of thought that has established a unique approac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radina N.K.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2018-12-01
Series:Психологическая наука и образование
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2018/n5/radina.shtml
_version_ 1818501100555206656
author Radina N.K.,
author_facet Radina N.K.,
author_sort Radina N.K.,
collection DOAJ
description The paper presents outcomes of an empirical study aimed at identifying the determinants that influence the preservation of the research agenda in a sci entific school by its followers.The study was carried out on the material of U.V.Ulyenkova’s school of thought that has established a unique approach to the diagnostics and treatment of children with delayed mental development.Our hypothesis was that the disciples of this scientific school that carry out their activities within the research agenda and research focus of the school’s founder have high levels of research achievements.In the course of the study we identified and followed a network of 42 disciples of Ulyenkova’s school of thought and evaluated their research activities, including the indices of their publishing activities in the Russian Science Citation Index.As it was revealed, the preservation of the ‘research programme’ of the academic supervisor is not common for this network of disciples, and their focus on studying children with delayed mental development is closely connected with citing U.V.Ulyenkova’s works and works of other members of the network.We emphasise that the key role is that of the social capital of the postgraduate network: co-authoring, readiness to read and cite works of other followers positively correlates with all the main indices of academic achievements of the explored network.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:51:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e02efaf89a014da1afc947fed295d039
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1814-2052
2311-7273
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:51:36Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
record_format Article
series Психологическая наука и образование
spelling doaj.art-e02efaf89a014da1afc947fed295d0392022-12-22T01:34:06ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихологическая наука и образование1814-20522311-72732018-12-0123512413210.17759/pse.2018230512Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)Radina N.K., 0National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhniy Novgorod, RussiaThe paper presents outcomes of an empirical study aimed at identifying the determinants that influence the preservation of the research agenda in a sci entific school by its followers.The study was carried out on the material of U.V.Ulyenkova’s school of thought that has established a unique approach to the diagnostics and treatment of children with delayed mental development.Our hypothesis was that the disciples of this scientific school that carry out their activities within the research agenda and research focus of the school’s founder have high levels of research achievements.In the course of the study we identified and followed a network of 42 disciples of Ulyenkova’s school of thought and evaluated their research activities, including the indices of their publishing activities in the Russian Science Citation Index.As it was revealed, the preservation of the ‘research programme’ of the academic supervisor is not common for this network of disciples, and their focus on studying children with delayed mental development is closely connected with citing U.V.Ulyenkova’s works and works of other members of the network.We emphasise that the key role is that of the social capital of the postgraduate network: co-authoring, readiness to read and cite works of other followers positively correlates with all the main indices of academic achievements of the explored network.http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2018/n5/radina.shtmlpostgraduate schoolscientific school
spellingShingle Radina N.K.,
Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
Психологическая наука и образование
postgraduate school
scientific school
title Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
title_full Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
title_fullStr Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
title_full_unstemmed Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
title_short Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)
title_sort limits of reproducing scientific traditions in regional schools of thought on the material of u v ulyenkova s school of thought
topic postgraduate school
scientific school
url http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2018/n5/radina.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT radinank limitsofreproducingscientifictraditionsinregionalschoolsofthoughtonthematerialofuvulyenkovasschoolofthought