Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease

White matter microstructural changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are often assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) obtained from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). FA depends on the acquisition and analysis methods, including the fitting algorithm. In this study, we compared FA maps from different ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maurizio Bergamino, Elizabeth G. Keeling, Ryan R. Walsh, Ashley M. Stokes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Tomography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/7/1/3
_version_ 1797520712082128896
author Maurizio Bergamino
Elizabeth G. Keeling
Ryan R. Walsh
Ashley M. Stokes
author_facet Maurizio Bergamino
Elizabeth G. Keeling
Ryan R. Walsh
Ashley M. Stokes
author_sort Maurizio Bergamino
collection DOAJ
description White matter microstructural changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are often assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) obtained from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). FA depends on the acquisition and analysis methods, including the fitting algorithm. In this study, we compared FA maps from different acquisitions and fitting algorithms in AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls (HCs) using the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Three acquisitions from two vendors were compared (Siemens 30, GE 48, and Siemens 54 directions). DTI data were fit using nine fitting algorithms (four linear least squares (LLS), two weighted LLS (WLLS), and three non-linear LLS (NLLS) from four software tools (FSL, DSI-Studio, CAMINO, and AFNI). Different cluster volumes and effect-sizes were observed across acquisitions and fits, but higher consistency was observed as the number of diffusion directions increased. Significant differences were observed between HC and AD groups for all acquisitions, while significant differences between HC and MCI groups were only observed for GE48 and SI54. Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, AFNI–LLS and CAMINO–RESTORE were the least consistent with the other algorithms. By combining data across all three acquisitions and nine fits, differences between AD and HC/MCI groups were observed in the fornix and corpus callosum, indicating FA differences in these regions may be robust DTI-based biomarkers. This study demonstrates that comparisons of FA across aging populations could be confounded by variability in acquisitions and fit methodologies and that identifying the most robust DTI methodology is critical to provide more reliable DTI-based neuroimaging biomarkers for assessing microstructural changes in AD.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:00:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e02f2a31bab047b585b0a5c513c1baee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2379-1381
2379-139X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:00:30Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Tomography
spelling doaj.art-e02f2a31bab047b585b0a5c513c1baee2023-11-22T11:32:20ZengMDPI AGTomography2379-13812379-139X2021-02-0171203810.3390/tomography7010003Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s DiseaseMaurizio Bergamino0Elizabeth G. Keeling1Ryan R. Walsh2Ashley M. Stokes3Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USADivision of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USAMuhammad Ali Parkinson Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USADivision of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USAWhite matter microstructural changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are often assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) obtained from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). FA depends on the acquisition and analysis methods, including the fitting algorithm. In this study, we compared FA maps from different acquisitions and fitting algorithms in AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls (HCs) using the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Three acquisitions from two vendors were compared (Siemens 30, GE 48, and Siemens 54 directions). DTI data were fit using nine fitting algorithms (four linear least squares (LLS), two weighted LLS (WLLS), and three non-linear LLS (NLLS) from four software tools (FSL, DSI-Studio, CAMINO, and AFNI). Different cluster volumes and effect-sizes were observed across acquisitions and fits, but higher consistency was observed as the number of diffusion directions increased. Significant differences were observed between HC and AD groups for all acquisitions, while significant differences between HC and MCI groups were only observed for GE48 and SI54. Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, AFNI–LLS and CAMINO–RESTORE were the least consistent with the other algorithms. By combining data across all three acquisitions and nine fits, differences between AD and HC/MCI groups were observed in the fornix and corpus callosum, indicating FA differences in these regions may be robust DTI-based biomarkers. This study demonstrates that comparisons of FA across aging populations could be confounded by variability in acquisitions and fit methodologies and that identifying the most robust DTI methodology is critical to provide more reliable DTI-based neuroimaging biomarkers for assessing microstructural changes in AD.https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/7/1/3Alzheimer’s diseasemild cognitive impairmentdiffusion tensor MRIcognitive declinefitting algorithms
spellingShingle Maurizio Bergamino
Elizabeth G. Keeling
Ryan R. Walsh
Ashley M. Stokes
Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
Tomography
Alzheimer’s disease
mild cognitive impairment
diffusion tensor MRI
cognitive decline
fitting algorithms
title Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Systematic Assessment of the Impact of DTI Methodology on Fractional Anisotropy Measures in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort systematic assessment of the impact of dti methodology on fractional anisotropy measures in alzheimer s disease
topic Alzheimer’s disease
mild cognitive impairment
diffusion tensor MRI
cognitive decline
fitting algorithms
url https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/7/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT mauriziobergamino systematicassessmentoftheimpactofdtimethodologyonfractionalanisotropymeasuresinalzheimersdisease
AT elizabethgkeeling systematicassessmentoftheimpactofdtimethodologyonfractionalanisotropymeasuresinalzheimersdisease
AT ryanrwalsh systematicassessmentoftheimpactofdtimethodologyonfractionalanisotropymeasuresinalzheimersdisease
AT ashleymstokes systematicassessmentoftheimpactofdtimethodologyonfractionalanisotropymeasuresinalzheimersdisease