Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements

Objective:This study aimed to assess intra-examiner and inter-examiner reproducibility in irregularity index measurements.Methods:Twenty plaster casts of moderately crowded arches were randomly selected, and five contact point displacements (CPD) at lower anterior segment (through no. 33 to no. 43)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ersat Cem İrezli, Mücahid Faik Şahin, Rana Demir, Aslı Baysal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2019-09-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/ntra-examiner-and-nter-examiner-reproducibility-in/53422
_version_ 1797767493605916672
author Ersat Cem İrezli
Mücahid Faik Şahin
Rana Demir
Aslı Baysal
author_facet Ersat Cem İrezli
Mücahid Faik Şahin
Rana Demir
Aslı Baysal
author_sort Ersat Cem İrezli
collection DOAJ
description Objective:This study aimed to assess intra-examiner and inter-examiner reproducibility in irregularity index measurements.Methods:Twenty plaster casts of moderately crowded arches were randomly selected, and five contact point displacements (CPD) at lower anterior segment (through no. 33 to no. 43) were recorded using digital calipers on two different time points by three examiners to determine irregularity index (sum of five CPDs). To evaluate intra-examiner and inter-examiner differences, paired t-test and analysis of variance were used, respectively. Correlation analyses were performed between examiner pairs, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.Results:Only a few of the repeated measurements of examiners showed significant differences (p≤0.05). All researchers were consistent in repeated measurements (p=0.000), and ICCs ranged between 0.916 and 0.986. For one CPD measurement, a statistically significant difference was detected among examiners (p=0.020). High correlation was found for inter-examiner repeatability (p<0.05), and ICCs ranged between 0.739 and 0.984. But when the difference of 1.5 mm among measurements was set as clinically relevant, the percentages of these values for repeated measures were 15%, 5%, and 45% for examiner 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These percentages were 25%, 80%, and 65% for examiner pairs.Conclusion:Irregularity index may be a misleading index to determine anterior alignment especially when measuring small CPD.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e03184ef62b24e4982f2a47de4e332aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:52Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-e03184ef62b24e4982f2a47de4e332aa2023-08-01T11:03:34ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052019-09-0132316016410.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.1807513049054Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index MeasurementsErsat Cem İrezli0Mücahid Faik Şahin1Rana Demir2Aslı Baysal3 Private Practice, İzmir, Turkey Department of Orthodontics, İzmir Katip Çelebi University School of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey Private Practice, Konya, Turkey Department of Orthodontics, İzmir Katip Çelebi University School of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey Objective:This study aimed to assess intra-examiner and inter-examiner reproducibility in irregularity index measurements.Methods:Twenty plaster casts of moderately crowded arches were randomly selected, and five contact point displacements (CPD) at lower anterior segment (through no. 33 to no. 43) were recorded using digital calipers on two different time points by three examiners to determine irregularity index (sum of five CPDs). To evaluate intra-examiner and inter-examiner differences, paired t-test and analysis of variance were used, respectively. Correlation analyses were performed between examiner pairs, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.Results:Only a few of the repeated measurements of examiners showed significant differences (p≤0.05). All researchers were consistent in repeated measurements (p=0.000), and ICCs ranged between 0.916 and 0.986. For one CPD measurement, a statistically significant difference was detected among examiners (p=0.020). High correlation was found for inter-examiner repeatability (p<0.05), and ICCs ranged between 0.739 and 0.984. But when the difference of 1.5 mm among measurements was set as clinically relevant, the percentages of these values for repeated measures were 15%, 5%, and 45% for examiner 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These percentages were 25%, 80%, and 65% for examiner pairs.Conclusion:Irregularity index may be a misleading index to determine anterior alignment especially when measuring small CPD. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/ntra-examiner-and-nter-examiner-reproducibility-in/53422 irregularity indexreproducibilitytooth crowdingdental model
spellingShingle Ersat Cem İrezli
Mücahid Faik Şahin
Rana Demir
Aslı Baysal
Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
irregularity index
reproducibility
tooth crowding
dental model
title Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
title_full Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
title_fullStr Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
title_short Intra-examiner and Inter-examiner Reproducibility in Irregularity Index Measurements
title_sort intra examiner and inter examiner reproducibility in irregularity index measurements
topic irregularity index
reproducibility
tooth crowding
dental model
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/ntra-examiner-and-nter-examiner-reproducibility-in/53422
work_keys_str_mv AT ersatcemirezli intraexaminerandinterexaminerreproducibilityinirregularityindexmeasurements
AT mucahidfaiksahin intraexaminerandinterexaminerreproducibilityinirregularityindexmeasurements
AT ranademir intraexaminerandinterexaminerreproducibilityinirregularityindexmeasurements
AT aslıbaysal intraexaminerandinterexaminerreproducibilityinirregularityindexmeasurements