Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever

Abstract EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin‐Bastuji, José Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Liisa Helena Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Karl Ståhl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Kris De Clercq, Eyal Klement, Jan Arend Stegeman, Simon Gubbins, Sotiria‐Eleni Antoniou, Alessandro Broglia, Yves Van der Stede, Gabriele Zancanaro, Inma Aznar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402
_version_ 1797996603281244160
author EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Klaus Depner
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Clare Roberts
Liisa Helena Sihvonen
Hans Spoolder
Karl Ståhl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Kris De Clercq
Eyal Klement
Jan Arend Stegeman
Simon Gubbins
Sotiria‐Eleni Antoniou
Alessandro Broglia
Yves Van der Stede
Gabriele Zancanaro
Inma Aznar
author_facet EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Klaus Depner
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Clare Roberts
Liisa Helena Sihvonen
Hans Spoolder
Karl Ståhl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Kris De Clercq
Eyal Klement
Jan Arend Stegeman
Simon Gubbins
Sotiria‐Eleni Antoniou
Alessandro Broglia
Yves Van der Stede
Gabriele Zancanaro
Inma Aznar
author_sort EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:18:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e040223f6d4441ec88ffed9f30cb354f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:18:52Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-e040223f6d4441ec88ffed9f30cb354f2022-12-22T04:29:49ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322021-01-01191n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine FeverEFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)Søren Saxmose NielsenJulio AlvarezDominique Joseph BicoutPaolo CalistriKlaus DepnerJulian Ashley DreweBruno Garin‐BastujiJosé Luis Gonzales RojasChristian Gortázar SchmidtMette HerskinVirginie MichelMiguel Ángel Miranda ChuecaPaolo PasqualiHelen Clare RobertsLiisa Helena SihvonenHans SpoolderKarl StåhlAntonio VelardeArvo ViltropChristoph WincklerKris De ClercqEyal KlementJan Arend StegemanSimon GubbinsSotiria‐Eleni AntoniouAlessandro BrogliaYves Van der StedeGabriele ZancanaroInma AznarAbstract EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402African Swine FeverSuidsdisease control measuresvector borne disease
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Klaus Depner
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Clare Roberts
Liisa Helena Sihvonen
Hans Spoolder
Karl Ståhl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Kris De Clercq
Eyal Klement
Jan Arend Stegeman
Simon Gubbins
Sotiria‐Eleni Antoniou
Alessandro Broglia
Yves Van der Stede
Gabriele Zancanaro
Inma Aznar
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
EFSA Journal
African Swine Fever
Suids
disease control measures
vector borne disease
title Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_full Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_short Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_sort scientific opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law african swine fever
topic African Swine Fever
Suids
disease control measures
vector borne disease
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonanimalhealthandwelfareefsaahawpanel scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT sørensaxmosenielsen scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT julioalvarez scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT dominiquejosephbicout scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT paolocalistri scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT klausdepner scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT julianashleydrewe scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT brunogarinbastuji scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT joseluisgonzalesrojas scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT christiangortazarschmidt scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT metteherskin scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT virginiemichel scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT miguelangelmirandachueca scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT paolopasquali scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT helenclareroberts scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT liisahelenasihvonen scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT hansspoolder scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT karlstahl scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT antoniovelarde scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT arvoviltrop scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT christophwinckler scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT krisdeclercq scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT eyalklement scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT janarendstegeman scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT simongubbins scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT sotiriaeleniantoniou scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT alessandrobroglia scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT yvesvanderstede scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT gabrielezancanaro scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT inmaaznar scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever