Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK

Abstract Innovative testing approaches and care pathways are required to meet HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) elimination goals. Routine testing for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) within emergency departments (EDs) is suggested by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control but t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Smout, Khine Phyu, Gareth J. Hughes, Lee Parker, Roozbeh Rezai, Amy Evans, Joscelyne McLaren, Stephen Bush, Sarah Davey, Mark A. Aldersley, Murad Ruf, Emma E. Page
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23602-1
_version_ 1811230466330591232
author Elizabeth Smout
Khine Phyu
Gareth J. Hughes
Lee Parker
Roozbeh Rezai
Amy Evans
Joscelyne McLaren
Stephen Bush
Sarah Davey
Mark A. Aldersley
Murad Ruf
Emma E. Page
author_facet Elizabeth Smout
Khine Phyu
Gareth J. Hughes
Lee Parker
Roozbeh Rezai
Amy Evans
Joscelyne McLaren
Stephen Bush
Sarah Davey
Mark A. Aldersley
Murad Ruf
Emma E. Page
author_sort Elizabeth Smout
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Innovative testing approaches and care pathways are required to meet HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) elimination goals. Routine testing for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) within emergency departments (EDs) is suggested by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control but there is a paucity of supporting evidence. We evaluated the introduction of routine BBV testing in EDs at a large teaching hospital in northern England. In October 2018, we modified the electronic laboratory ordering system to reflex opt-out HIV, HBV and HCV testing for all ED attendees aged 16–65 years who had a routine blood test for urea and electrolytes (U&Es). Linkage to care (LTC) was attempted for newly diagnosed patients, those never referred and those who had previously disengaged from care. The project operated for 18 months, here we present evaluation of the initial nine months (2 October 2018–1 July 2019). We analysed testing uptake, BBV seropositivity, LTC and treatment initiation within six months post-diagnosis. Over 9 months, 17,026/28,178 (60.4%) ED attendees who had U&Es performed were tested for ≥ 1 BBV. 299 active BBV infections were identified: 70 HIV Ab/Ag-positive (0.4% seroprevalence), 73 HBsAg-positive (0.4%) and 156 HCV RNA-positive (1.0%). Only 24.3% (17/70) HIV Ab/Ag-positive individuals required LTC, compared to 94.9% (148/156) HCV RNA-positive and 53.4% (39/73) HBsAg-positive individuals. LTC was successful in 94.1% (16/17) HIV Ab/Ag-positive and 69.3% (27/39) HBsAg-positive individuals. However, at 6 months LTC was just 39.2% (58/148) for HCV RNA-positive individuals, with 64% (37/58) of these commencing treatment. Universal opt-out ED BBV testing proved feasible and effective in identifying active BBV infections, especially among marginalised populations with reduced healthcare access. Our integrated approach achieved good LTC rates although further service development is necessary, particularly for HCV RNA-positive people who inject drugs.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:29:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e04403594d444610a4c3cbf1446b315b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:29:46Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-e04403594d444610a4c3cbf1446b315b2022-12-22T03:36:52ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-11-011211910.1038/s41598-022-23602-1Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UKElizabeth Smout0Khine Phyu1Gareth J. Hughes2Lee Parker3Roozbeh Rezai4Amy Evans5Joscelyne McLaren6Stephen Bush7Sarah Davey8Mark A. Aldersley9Murad Ruf10Emma E. Page11UK Field Epidemiology Training Programme, UK Health Security AgencyLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryField Service, UK Health Security AgencyLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryPublic Health, Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences LtdLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General InfirmaryAbstract Innovative testing approaches and care pathways are required to meet HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) elimination goals. Routine testing for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) within emergency departments (EDs) is suggested by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control but there is a paucity of supporting evidence. We evaluated the introduction of routine BBV testing in EDs at a large teaching hospital in northern England. In October 2018, we modified the electronic laboratory ordering system to reflex opt-out HIV, HBV and HCV testing for all ED attendees aged 16–65 years who had a routine blood test for urea and electrolytes (U&Es). Linkage to care (LTC) was attempted for newly diagnosed patients, those never referred and those who had previously disengaged from care. The project operated for 18 months, here we present evaluation of the initial nine months (2 October 2018–1 July 2019). We analysed testing uptake, BBV seropositivity, LTC and treatment initiation within six months post-diagnosis. Over 9 months, 17,026/28,178 (60.4%) ED attendees who had U&Es performed were tested for ≥ 1 BBV. 299 active BBV infections were identified: 70 HIV Ab/Ag-positive (0.4% seroprevalence), 73 HBsAg-positive (0.4%) and 156 HCV RNA-positive (1.0%). Only 24.3% (17/70) HIV Ab/Ag-positive individuals required LTC, compared to 94.9% (148/156) HCV RNA-positive and 53.4% (39/73) HBsAg-positive individuals. LTC was successful in 94.1% (16/17) HIV Ab/Ag-positive and 69.3% (27/39) HBsAg-positive individuals. However, at 6 months LTC was just 39.2% (58/148) for HCV RNA-positive individuals, with 64% (37/58) of these commencing treatment. Universal opt-out ED BBV testing proved feasible and effective in identifying active BBV infections, especially among marginalised populations with reduced healthcare access. Our integrated approach achieved good LTC rates although further service development is necessary, particularly for HCV RNA-positive people who inject drugs.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23602-1
spellingShingle Elizabeth Smout
Khine Phyu
Gareth J. Hughes
Lee Parker
Roozbeh Rezai
Amy Evans
Joscelyne McLaren
Stephen Bush
Sarah Davey
Mark A. Aldersley
Murad Ruf
Emma E. Page
Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
Scientific Reports
title Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
title_full Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
title_fullStr Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
title_short Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK
title_sort real world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the uk
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23602-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethsmout realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT khinephyu realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT garethjhughes realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT leeparker realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT roozbehrezai realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT amyevans realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT joscelynemclaren realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT stephenbush realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT sarahdavey realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT markaaldersley realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT muradruf realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk
AT emmaepage realworldclinicaleffectivenessandsustainabilityofuniversalbloodbornevirustestinginanurbanemergencydepartmentintheuk