HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature

Identifying and reaching women at higher risk for cervical cancer is all-important for achieving the ambitious endpoints set in 2020 by the WHO for global cervical cancer control by 2030. HPV-based (vaginal) self-sampling (SS) represents a cost-effective screening strategy, which has been successful...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikoletta Daponte, George Valasoulis, Georgios Michail, Ioulia Magaliou, Athina-Ioanna Daponte, Antonios Garas, Ioanna Grivea, Dimitrios P. Bogdanos, Alexandros Daponte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/6/1669
_version_ 1797613021964533760
author Nikoletta Daponte
George Valasoulis
Georgios Michail
Ioulia Magaliou
Athina-Ioanna Daponte
Antonios Garas
Ioanna Grivea
Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
Alexandros Daponte
author_facet Nikoletta Daponte
George Valasoulis
Georgios Michail
Ioulia Magaliou
Athina-Ioanna Daponte
Antonios Garas
Ioanna Grivea
Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
Alexandros Daponte
author_sort Nikoletta Daponte
collection DOAJ
description Identifying and reaching women at higher risk for cervical cancer is all-important for achieving the ambitious endpoints set in 2020 by the WHO for global cervical cancer control by 2030. HPV-based (vaginal) self-sampling (SS) represents a cost-effective screening strategy, which has been successfully implemented during the last decade both in affluent and constrained settings. Among other advantages, SS strategies offer convenience, diminished costs, flexibility to obtain a sample in the office or home, avoiding a pelvic exam and uncomfortable appointment with a healthcare professional, as well as social and cultural acceptability. SS implementation has been globally boosted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In pragmatic terms, social distancing, local lockdowns, discontinuation of clinics and reallocation of human and financial resources challenged established clinician-based screening; self-collection strategies apparently surpassed most obstacles, representing a viable and flexible alternative. With time, sufficient reassuring data has accumulated regarding specially designed SS devices, aspects of sample preparation, transport and storage and, importantly, optimization of validated PCR-based HPV testing platforms for self-collected specimens. Suboptimal rates of clinical follow-up post-SS screening, as well as overtreatment with reliance solely on molecular assays, have both been documented and remain concerning. Therefore, effective strategies are still required to ensure linkage to follow-up testing and management following positive SS results by trained health professionals with knowledge of HPV biology and management algorithms. Because of the prolonged SS screening intervals, implementation data are limited regarding subsequent screening rounds of SS-screened individuals; however, these are accumulating gradually. With further refinement of assays and validation of novel biomarkers in self-collected samples, there is a clear potential for increasing SS accuracy and PPV. The potential differentiation of self-collection protocols for vaccinated versus non-vaccinated individuals also represents an open issue. In conclusion, HPV-based self-collection techniques can effectively address limited uptake alongside other conventional cervical screening drawbacks; however, assays, logistics and infrastructures need further optimization to increase the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SS approaches.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:50:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e049c3f301b74beb8638aff83eca0df1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:50:05Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-e049c3f301b74beb8638aff83eca0df12023-11-17T10:05:32ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942023-03-01156166910.3390/cancers15061669HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the LiteratureNikoletta Daponte0George Valasoulis1Georgios Michail2Ioulia Magaliou3Athina-Ioanna Daponte4Antonios Garas5Ioanna Grivea6Dimitrios P. Bogdanos7Alexandros Daponte8Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, GreeceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceSecond Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, GreeceIdentifying and reaching women at higher risk for cervical cancer is all-important for achieving the ambitious endpoints set in 2020 by the WHO for global cervical cancer control by 2030. HPV-based (vaginal) self-sampling (SS) represents a cost-effective screening strategy, which has been successfully implemented during the last decade both in affluent and constrained settings. Among other advantages, SS strategies offer convenience, diminished costs, flexibility to obtain a sample in the office or home, avoiding a pelvic exam and uncomfortable appointment with a healthcare professional, as well as social and cultural acceptability. SS implementation has been globally boosted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In pragmatic terms, social distancing, local lockdowns, discontinuation of clinics and reallocation of human and financial resources challenged established clinician-based screening; self-collection strategies apparently surpassed most obstacles, representing a viable and flexible alternative. With time, sufficient reassuring data has accumulated regarding specially designed SS devices, aspects of sample preparation, transport and storage and, importantly, optimization of validated PCR-based HPV testing platforms for self-collected specimens. Suboptimal rates of clinical follow-up post-SS screening, as well as overtreatment with reliance solely on molecular assays, have both been documented and remain concerning. Therefore, effective strategies are still required to ensure linkage to follow-up testing and management following positive SS results by trained health professionals with knowledge of HPV biology and management algorithms. Because of the prolonged SS screening intervals, implementation data are limited regarding subsequent screening rounds of SS-screened individuals; however, these are accumulating gradually. With further refinement of assays and validation of novel biomarkers in self-collected samples, there is a clear potential for increasing SS accuracy and PPV. The potential differentiation of self-collection protocols for vaccinated versus non-vaccinated individuals also represents an open issue. In conclusion, HPV-based self-collection techniques can effectively address limited uptake alongside other conventional cervical screening drawbacks; however, assays, logistics and infrastructures need further optimization to increase the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SS approaches.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/6/1669human papillomavirusHPVself-samplingcervical cancerscreeningsecondary prevention
spellingShingle Nikoletta Daponte
George Valasoulis
Georgios Michail
Ioulia Magaliou
Athina-Ioanna Daponte
Antonios Garas
Ioanna Grivea
Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
Alexandros Daponte
HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
Cancers
human papillomavirus
HPV
self-sampling
cervical cancer
screening
secondary prevention
title HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
title_full HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
title_fullStr HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
title_full_unstemmed HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
title_short HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature
title_sort hpv based self sampling in cervical cancer screening an updated review of the current evidence in the literature
topic human papillomavirus
HPV
self-sampling
cervical cancer
screening
secondary prevention
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/6/1669
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolettadaponte hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT georgevalasoulis hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT georgiosmichail hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT iouliamagaliou hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT athinaioannadaponte hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT antoniosgaras hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT ioannagrivea hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT dimitriospbogdanos hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature
AT alexandrosdaponte hpvbasedselfsamplingincervicalcancerscreeninganupdatedreviewofthecurrentevidenceintheliterature