Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user

Studies indicate that the energy performance gap between real and calculated energy use can be explained for 80% by occupant behaviour. This human factor may be composed of routine and thermoregulatory behaviour. When occupants do not feel comfortable due to high or low operative temperatures and re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Visser Loes, Kingma Boris, Willems Eric, Broers Wendy, Loomans Marcel, Schellen Henk, op’t Veld Peter, Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter van
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_04056.pdf
_version_ 1818445235653443584
author Visser Loes
Kingma Boris
Willems Eric
Broers Wendy
Loomans Marcel
Schellen Henk
op’t Veld Peter
Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter van
author_facet Visser Loes
Kingma Boris
Willems Eric
Broers Wendy
Loomans Marcel
Schellen Henk
op’t Veld Peter
Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter van
author_sort Visser Loes
collection DOAJ
description Studies indicate that the energy performance gap between real and calculated energy use can be explained for 80% by occupant behaviour. This human factor may be composed of routine and thermoregulatory behaviour. When occupants do not feel comfortable due to high or low operative temperatures and resulting high or low skin temperatures, they are likely to exhibit thermoregulatory behaviour. The aim of this study is to monitor and understand this thermoregulatory behaviour of the occupant. This is a detailed study of two females living in a rowhouse in the city of Heerlen (Netherlands). During a monitoring period of three weeks over a time span of three months the following parameters were monitored: activity level, clothing, micro climate, skin temperatures and thermal comfort and sensation. Their micro climate was measured at five positions on the body to assess exposed near body conditions and skin temperature. Every two hours they filled in a questionnaire regarding their thermal comfort and sensation level (7-point scale), clothing, activities and thermoregulatory behaviour. The most comfortable (optimal) temperature was calculated for each person by adopting a biophysical model, a thermoneutral zone model. This study shows unique indivual comfort patterns in relation to ambient conditions. An example is given how this information can be used to calculate the buildings energy comsumption.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T19:28:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e04ba8fe9cc34f2fb292082995624104
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T19:28:37Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-e04ba8fe9cc34f2fb2920829956241042022-12-21T22:50:07ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-011110405610.1051/e3sconf/201911104056e3sconf_clima2019_04056Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end userVisser LoesKingma BorisWillems Eric0Broers Wendy1Loomans Marcel2Schellen Henk3op’t Veld Peter4Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter van5Huygen Engineers & Consultants B.V.Zuyd University of Applied SciencesDepartment of the Built Environment, Unit Building Physics and Services, Eindhoven University of TechnologyDepartment of the Built Environment, Unit Building Physics and Services, Eindhoven University of TechnologyHuygen Engineers & Consultants B.V.Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and MetabolismStudies indicate that the energy performance gap between real and calculated energy use can be explained for 80% by occupant behaviour. This human factor may be composed of routine and thermoregulatory behaviour. When occupants do not feel comfortable due to high or low operative temperatures and resulting high or low skin temperatures, they are likely to exhibit thermoregulatory behaviour. The aim of this study is to monitor and understand this thermoregulatory behaviour of the occupant. This is a detailed study of two females living in a rowhouse in the city of Heerlen (Netherlands). During a monitoring period of three weeks over a time span of three months the following parameters were monitored: activity level, clothing, micro climate, skin temperatures and thermal comfort and sensation. Their micro climate was measured at five positions on the body to assess exposed near body conditions and skin temperature. Every two hours they filled in a questionnaire regarding their thermal comfort and sensation level (7-point scale), clothing, activities and thermoregulatory behaviour. The most comfortable (optimal) temperature was calculated for each person by adopting a biophysical model, a thermoneutral zone model. This study shows unique indivual comfort patterns in relation to ambient conditions. An example is given how this information can be used to calculate the buildings energy comsumption.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_04056.pdf
spellingShingle Visser Loes
Kingma Boris
Willems Eric
Broers Wendy
Loomans Marcel
Schellen Henk
op’t Veld Peter
Marken Lichtenbelt Wouter van
Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
E3S Web of Conferences
title Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
title_full Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
title_fullStr Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
title_full_unstemmed Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
title_short Occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings: Monitoring the end user
title_sort occupant behaviour and thermal comfort in buildings monitoring the end user
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/37/e3sconf_clima2019_04056.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT visserloes occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT kingmaboris occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT willemseric occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT broerswendy occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT loomansmarcel occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT schellenhenk occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT optveldpeter occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser
AT markenlichtenbeltwoutervan occupantbehaviourandthermalcomfortinbuildingsmonitoringtheenduser