Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?

Transport and land use planning are in a state of flux. Projects face increased technical, social, financial, political and legal complexities while the conventional project planning approach is struggling to deal with these complexities. As a result, many projects fail to be completed in time and o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Busscher, Taede Tillema, Jos Arts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft OPEN Publishing 2015-04-01
Series:European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3067
_version_ 1797427237067161600
author Tim Busscher
Taede Tillema
Jos Arts
author_facet Tim Busscher
Taede Tillema
Jos Arts
author_sort Tim Busscher
collection DOAJ
description Transport and land use planning are in a state of flux. Projects face increased technical, social, financial, political and legal complexities while the conventional project planning approach is struggling to deal with these complexities. As a result, many projects fail to be completed in time and on budget. To deal with this issue, alternative planning approaches are developed in planning theory and literature. On the one hand, a more communicative project planning approach has been developed. On the other, a more programme-oriented planning approach has been suggested. While the former trend has inspired many empirical studies, the latter trend has received less research attention. Therefore, in this article, we focus on the trend towards a more programme-oriented planning approach. The objective of this article is to gain insight into how programmes impact project performance in light of project complexities. To this end, we conducted a case study research into how two different programmes – the Urgent Approach Programme and the National Collaboration Programme on Air Quality – impact the delivery of the national highway project A4 between Burgerveen-Leiden in the Netherlands. We used desk research and conducted 20 semi-structured interviews on project and programme level with various stakeholders. Our analysis reveals that programmes do not really influence technical and social complexities. These are predominantly affected by the introduction of a communicative project planning approach. Through restructuring project-specific political discussions and providing solutions to legal issues by explicitly connecting multiple projects to each other, programmes can be an effective means to deal with political and legal complexities.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:41:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e06274b9ce724ef09ccff583bdfc6bd8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1567-7141
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:41:23Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher TU Delft OPEN Publishing
record_format Article
series European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
spelling doaj.art-e06274b9ce724ef09ccff583bdfc6bd82023-12-02T16:45:19ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412015-04-0115210.18757/ejtir.2015.15.2.30672680Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?Tim Busscher0Taede Tillema1Jos Arts2University of GroningenKiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy AnalysisUniversity of Groningen and RijkswaterstaatTransport and land use planning are in a state of flux. Projects face increased technical, social, financial, political and legal complexities while the conventional project planning approach is struggling to deal with these complexities. As a result, many projects fail to be completed in time and on budget. To deal with this issue, alternative planning approaches are developed in planning theory and literature. On the one hand, a more communicative project planning approach has been developed. On the other, a more programme-oriented planning approach has been suggested. While the former trend has inspired many empirical studies, the latter trend has received less research attention. Therefore, in this article, we focus on the trend towards a more programme-oriented planning approach. The objective of this article is to gain insight into how programmes impact project performance in light of project complexities. To this end, we conducted a case study research into how two different programmes – the Urgent Approach Programme and the National Collaboration Programme on Air Quality – impact the delivery of the national highway project A4 between Burgerveen-Leiden in the Netherlands. We used desk research and conducted 20 semi-structured interviews on project and programme level with various stakeholders. Our analysis reveals that programmes do not really influence technical and social complexities. These are predominantly affected by the introduction of a communicative project planning approach. Through restructuring project-specific political discussions and providing solutions to legal issues by explicitly connecting multiple projects to each other, programmes can be an effective means to deal with political and legal complexities.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3067
spellingShingle Tim Busscher
Taede Tillema
Jos Arts
Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
title Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
title_full Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
title_fullStr Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
title_full_unstemmed Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
title_short Improving project delivery; Programmes as the silver bullet?
title_sort improving project delivery programmes as the silver bullet
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3067
work_keys_str_mv AT timbusscher improvingprojectdeliveryprogrammesasthesilverbullet
AT taedetillema improvingprojectdeliveryprogrammesasthesilverbullet
AT josarts improvingprojectdeliveryprogrammesasthesilverbullet