Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates

A wide body of literature suggests that geological gas emissions from Earth’s degassing are a major methane (CH4) source to the atmosphere. These emissions are from gas-oil seeps, mud volcanoes, microseepage and submarine seepage in sedimentary (petroleum-bearing) basins, and geothermal and volcanic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giuseppe Etiope, Stefan Schwietzke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioOne 2019-11-01
Series:Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.elementascience.org/articles/383
_version_ 1819049909316222976
author Giuseppe Etiope
Stefan Schwietzke
author_facet Giuseppe Etiope
Stefan Schwietzke
author_sort Giuseppe Etiope
collection DOAJ
description A wide body of literature suggests that geological gas emissions from Earth’s degassing are a major methane (CH4) source to the atmosphere. These emissions are from gas-oil seeps, mud volcanoes, microseepage and submarine seepage in sedimentary (petroleum-bearing) basins, and geothermal and volcanic manifestations. Global bottom-up emission estimates, ranging from 30 to 76 Tg CH4 yr–1, evolved in the last twenty years thanks to the increasing number of flux measurements, and improved knowledge of emission factors and area distribution (activity). Based on recent global grid maps and updated evaluations of mud volcano and microseepage emissions, the global geo-CH4 source is now (bottom-up) estimated to be 45 (27–63) Tg yr–1, i.e., ~8% of total CH4 sources. Top-down verifications, based on independent approaches (including ethane and isotopic observations) from different authors, are consistent with the range of the bottom-up estimate. However, a recent top-down study, based on radiocarbon analyses in polar ice cores, suggests that geological, fossil (14C-free) CH4 emissions about 11,600 years ago were much lower (<15 Tg yr–1, 95% CI) and that this source strength could also be valid today. Here, we show that (i) this geo-CH4 downward revision implies a fossil fuel industry CH4 upward revision of at least 24–35%. (ii) The 95% CI estimates of the recent radiocarbon analysis do not overlap with those of 5 out of 6 other bottom-up and top-down studies (no overlap for the 90% CI estimates). (iii) The contrasting lines of evidence require further discussion, and research opportunities exist to help explain this gap.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T11:39:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0652fdb09314c4abce3b0f8c17d9134
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2325-1026
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T11:39:38Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BioOne
record_format Article
series Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
spelling doaj.art-e0652fdb09314c4abce3b0f8c17d91342022-12-21T19:05:21ZengBioOneElementa: Science of the Anthropocene2325-10262019-11-017110.1525/elementa.383358Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimatesGiuseppe Etiope0Stefan Schwietzke1Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, RomeEnvironmental Defense Fund, LondonA wide body of literature suggests that geological gas emissions from Earth’s degassing are a major methane (CH4) source to the atmosphere. These emissions are from gas-oil seeps, mud volcanoes, microseepage and submarine seepage in sedimentary (petroleum-bearing) basins, and geothermal and volcanic manifestations. Global bottom-up emission estimates, ranging from 30 to 76 Tg CH4 yr–1, evolved in the last twenty years thanks to the increasing number of flux measurements, and improved knowledge of emission factors and area distribution (activity). Based on recent global grid maps and updated evaluations of mud volcano and microseepage emissions, the global geo-CH4 source is now (bottom-up) estimated to be 45 (27–63) Tg yr–1, i.e., ~8% of total CH4 sources. Top-down verifications, based on independent approaches (including ethane and isotopic observations) from different authors, are consistent with the range of the bottom-up estimate. However, a recent top-down study, based on radiocarbon analyses in polar ice cores, suggests that geological, fossil (14C-free) CH4 emissions about 11,600 years ago were much lower (<15 Tg yr–1, 95% CI) and that this source strength could also be valid today. Here, we show that (i) this geo-CH4 downward revision implies a fossil fuel industry CH4 upward revision of at least 24–35%. (ii) The 95% CI estimates of the recent radiocarbon analysis do not overlap with those of 5 out of 6 other bottom-up and top-down studies (no overlap for the 90% CI estimates). (iii) The contrasting lines of evidence require further discussion, and research opportunities exist to help explain this gap.https://www.elementascience.org/articles/383geological methaneseepageglobal emission estimatesbottom-uptop-down
spellingShingle Giuseppe Etiope
Stefan Schwietzke
Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
geological methane
seepage
global emission estimates
bottom-up
top-down
title Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
title_full Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
title_fullStr Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
title_full_unstemmed Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
title_short Global geological methane emissions: an update of top-down and bottom-up estimates
title_sort global geological methane emissions an update of top down and bottom up estimates
topic geological methane
seepage
global emission estimates
bottom-up
top-down
url https://www.elementascience.org/articles/383
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppeetiope globalgeologicalmethaneemissionsanupdateoftopdownandbottomupestimates
AT stefanschwietzke globalgeologicalmethaneemissionsanupdateoftopdownandbottomupestimates