Scientific Questions of Fact Between Free Evaluation of Evidence and Proof Beyond any Reasonable Doubt in the Criminal Trial
In contemporary legal epistemology it is common to talk about the “paradox of expert testimony”, which can be formulated as follows: “how can the judge assess information provided by an expert witness if he needs him precisely because of his own lack of adequate specialist knowledge?”. The goal of t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Marcial Pons
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22366 |
Similar Items
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law
by: John Woods
Published: (2008-02-01)
by: John Woods
Published: (2008-02-01)