Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields

We use a single aerosol model to explore the effects of the differing meteorological fields from the NCAR CAM5 and GFDL AM3 models. We simulate the global distributions of sulfate, black carbon, organic matter, dust and sea salt using the University of Michigan IMPACT model and use these fields to c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Zhou, J. E. Penner, Y. Ming, X. L. Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/9629/2012/acp-12-9629-2012.pdf
_version_ 1819274819031531520
author C. Zhou
J. E. Penner
Y. Ming
X. L. Huang
author_facet C. Zhou
J. E. Penner
Y. Ming
X. L. Huang
author_sort C. Zhou
collection DOAJ
description We use a single aerosol model to explore the effects of the differing meteorological fields from the NCAR CAM5 and GFDL AM3 models. We simulate the global distributions of sulfate, black carbon, organic matter, dust and sea salt using the University of Michigan IMPACT model and use these fields to calculate aerosol direct and indirect forcing, thereby isolating the impacts of the differing meteorological fields. <br><br> Over all, the IMPACT-AM3 model predicts larger burdens and longer aerosol lifetimes than the IMPACT-CAM5 model. However, the IMPACT-CAM5 simulations transport more black carbon to the polar regions and more dust from Asia towards North America. These differences can mainly be attributed to differences in: (1) the vertical cloud mass flux and large-scale precipitation fields which determine the wet deposition of aerosols; (2) the in-cloud liquid water content and the cloud coverage which determine the wet aqueous phase production of sulfate. The burden, lifetime and global distribution, especially black carbon in polar regions, are strongly affected by choice of the parameters used for wet deposition. <br><br> The total annual mean aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm ranges from 0.087 to 0.122 for the IMPACT-AM3 model and from 0.138 to 0.186 for the IMPACT-CAM5 model (range is due to different parameters used for wet deposition). Even though IMPACT-CAM5 has smaller aerosol burdens, its AOD is larger due to the much higher relative humidity in CAM5 which leads to more hygroscopic growth. The corresponding global annual average anthropogenic and all-sky aerosol direct forcing at the top of the atmosphere ranges from −0.25 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −0.30 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-AM3 and from −0.48 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −0.64 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-CAM5. The global annual average anthropogenic 1st aerosol indirect effect at the top of the atmosphere ranges from −1.26 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −1.44 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-AM3 and from −1.74 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −1.77 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-CAM5.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T23:14:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e06a2c0dc3aa41aca5be553cd5b12497
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T23:14:29Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-e06a2c0dc3aa41aca5be553cd5b124972022-12-21T17:26:34ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242012-10-0112209629965210.5194/acp-12-9629-2012Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fieldsC. ZhouJ. E. PennerY. MingX. L. HuangWe use a single aerosol model to explore the effects of the differing meteorological fields from the NCAR CAM5 and GFDL AM3 models. We simulate the global distributions of sulfate, black carbon, organic matter, dust and sea salt using the University of Michigan IMPACT model and use these fields to calculate aerosol direct and indirect forcing, thereby isolating the impacts of the differing meteorological fields. <br><br> Over all, the IMPACT-AM3 model predicts larger burdens and longer aerosol lifetimes than the IMPACT-CAM5 model. However, the IMPACT-CAM5 simulations transport more black carbon to the polar regions and more dust from Asia towards North America. These differences can mainly be attributed to differences in: (1) the vertical cloud mass flux and large-scale precipitation fields which determine the wet deposition of aerosols; (2) the in-cloud liquid water content and the cloud coverage which determine the wet aqueous phase production of sulfate. The burden, lifetime and global distribution, especially black carbon in polar regions, are strongly affected by choice of the parameters used for wet deposition. <br><br> The total annual mean aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm ranges from 0.087 to 0.122 for the IMPACT-AM3 model and from 0.138 to 0.186 for the IMPACT-CAM5 model (range is due to different parameters used for wet deposition). Even though IMPACT-CAM5 has smaller aerosol burdens, its AOD is larger due to the much higher relative humidity in CAM5 which leads to more hygroscopic growth. The corresponding global annual average anthropogenic and all-sky aerosol direct forcing at the top of the atmosphere ranges from −0.25 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −0.30 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-AM3 and from −0.48 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −0.64 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-CAM5. The global annual average anthropogenic 1st aerosol indirect effect at the top of the atmosphere ranges from −1.26 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −1.44 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-AM3 and from −1.74 W m<sup>−2</sup> to −1.77 W m<sup>−2</sup> for IMPACT-CAM5.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/9629/2012/acp-12-9629-2012.pdf
spellingShingle C. Zhou
J. E. Penner
Y. Ming
X. L. Huang
Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
title_full Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
title_fullStr Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
title_short Aerosol forcing based on CAM5 and AM3 meteorological fields
title_sort aerosol forcing based on cam5 and am3 meteorological fields
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/9629/2012/acp-12-9629-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT czhou aerosolforcingbasedoncam5andam3meteorologicalfields
AT jepenner aerosolforcingbasedoncam5andam3meteorologicalfields
AT yming aerosolforcingbasedoncam5andam3meteorologicalfields
AT xlhuang aerosolforcingbasedoncam5andam3meteorologicalfields