QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of patient’s life after multiple myeloma regression in regard with demographic, clinical, psychosocial risk factors of poor prognosis, depending on the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Methods: Subjects with full or partial remission of mul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. M. Kolesnik, B. B. Samura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaporozhye State Medical University 2014-12-01
Series:Aktualʹnì Pitannâ Farmacevtičnoï ì Medičnoï Nauki ta Praktiki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pharmed.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/33877/30413
_version_ 1818192059836661760
author Yu. M. Kolesnik
B. B. Samura
author_facet Yu. M. Kolesnik
B. B. Samura
author_sort Yu. M. Kolesnik
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to compare the quality of patient’s life after multiple myeloma regression in regard with demographic, clinical, psychosocial risk factors of poor prognosis, depending on the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Methods: Subjects with full or partial remission of multiple myeloma were enrolled in the study.Diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma were defined by current clinical practice guidelines. To be achieving remission chemotherapy with MPT, MP, CVP, PAD, VMPT, VADTD, CTD, VMP was used accordingly contemporary clinical guidelines. All subjects were at full or partial remission stage at baseline. Surveys were given to multiple myeloma survivors on average who participated in the study after reaching regression and were monitored during 12 months. 95 patients were invited to complete the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors questionnaire (QOL-CS), and 89 patients (93.7%) responded. Standardized measures of quality of life, perceptions of the impact of myeloma, symptoms, and demographic variables were examined using linear regression modeling to identify predictors of quality of life over time.Echocardiography in B-mode was performed accordingly to Recommendation of American Society of Echocardiography on the scanner “MyLab 50” (Italy) using a transducer with a frequency of 2.5-3.5 MHz. Results: One hundred three cumulative clinical events occurred in 38 patients (42.7%). Patients who had cardiovascular events reported significantly worse psychological well-being, general health, less vitality and health-related quality of life than patients who had not cardiovascular events. Chemotherapy was associated with quality of life outcomes. Patients who were not diagnosed cardiovascular events reported better social well-being than patients who were diagnosed cardiovascular events. Improvement in life quality over a long period has not been documented previously in patients with multiple myeloma, although it is known that they experience a significant improvement in life quality soon after the completion of therapy compared with their baseline levels. The observed differences in life quality were significant only when they were measured with the QOL-CS, and not with the SF-36. This may reflect, in large part, the fact that the QOL-CS was developed specifically for use among cancer survivors, whereas the SF-36 is a generic HRQL instrument. Conclusion: The general health perceptions and vitality levels of multiple myeloma survivors with cardiovascular events remained significantly lower than those of patients without cardiovascular events.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e08a4bd9bdbd4aa8b7a2061bfa7dff71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-8094
2409-2932
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:24:29Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Zaporozhye State Medical University
record_format Article
series Aktualʹnì Pitannâ Farmacevtičnoï ì Medičnoï Nauki ta Praktiki
spelling doaj.art-e08a4bd9bdbd4aa8b7a2061bfa7dff712022-12-22T00:44:39ZengZaporozhye State Medical UniversityAktualʹnì Pitannâ Farmacevtičnoï ì Medičnoï Nauki ta Praktiki2306-80942409-29322014-12-013778310.14739/2409-2932.2014.3.33877QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSIONYu. M. KolesnikB. B. SamuraThe aim of this study was to compare the quality of patient’s life after multiple myeloma regression in regard with demographic, clinical, psychosocial risk factors of poor prognosis, depending on the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Methods: Subjects with full or partial remission of multiple myeloma were enrolled in the study.Diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma were defined by current clinical practice guidelines. To be achieving remission chemotherapy with MPT, MP, CVP, PAD, VMPT, VADTD, CTD, VMP was used accordingly contemporary clinical guidelines. All subjects were at full or partial remission stage at baseline. Surveys were given to multiple myeloma survivors on average who participated in the study after reaching regression and were monitored during 12 months. 95 patients were invited to complete the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors questionnaire (QOL-CS), and 89 patients (93.7%) responded. Standardized measures of quality of life, perceptions of the impact of myeloma, symptoms, and demographic variables were examined using linear regression modeling to identify predictors of quality of life over time.Echocardiography in B-mode was performed accordingly to Recommendation of American Society of Echocardiography on the scanner “MyLab 50” (Italy) using a transducer with a frequency of 2.5-3.5 MHz. Results: One hundred three cumulative clinical events occurred in 38 patients (42.7%). Patients who had cardiovascular events reported significantly worse psychological well-being, general health, less vitality and health-related quality of life than patients who had not cardiovascular events. Chemotherapy was associated with quality of life outcomes. Patients who were not diagnosed cardiovascular events reported better social well-being than patients who were diagnosed cardiovascular events. Improvement in life quality over a long period has not been documented previously in patients with multiple myeloma, although it is known that they experience a significant improvement in life quality soon after the completion of therapy compared with their baseline levels. The observed differences in life quality were significant only when they were measured with the QOL-CS, and not with the SF-36. This may reflect, in large part, the fact that the QOL-CS was developed specifically for use among cancer survivors, whereas the SF-36 is a generic HRQL instrument. Conclusion: The general health perceptions and vitality levels of multiple myeloma survivors with cardiovascular events remained significantly lower than those of patients without cardiovascular events.http://pharmed.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/33877/30413quality of lifemultiple myelomasurvivalprognosis
spellingShingle Yu. M. Kolesnik
B. B. Samura
QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
Aktualʹnì Pitannâ Farmacevtičnoï ì Medičnoï Nauki ta Praktiki
quality of life
multiple myeloma
survival
prognosis
title QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
title_full QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
title_fullStr QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
title_full_unstemmed QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
title_short QUALITY OF PATIENT’S LIFE AFTER MULTIPLE MYELOMAREGRESSION
title_sort quality of patient s life after multiple myelomaregression
topic quality of life
multiple myeloma
survival
prognosis
url http://pharmed.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/33877/30413
work_keys_str_mv AT yumkolesnik qualityofpatientslifeaftermultiplemyelomaregression
AT bbsamura qualityofpatientslifeaftermultiplemyelomaregression