Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies

Purpose: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section in orbital and adnexal malignancies. Methods: A total of 55 cases between January 2006 and December 2011 for which intraoperative frozen section was performed for various orbital and adnexal lesions were included in the study. The frozen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md Shahid Alam, Andrea Tongbram, Subramanian Krishnakumar, Jyotirmay Biswas, Bipasha Mukherjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1988;epage=1992;aulast=Alam
_version_ 1819160712353677312
author Md Shahid Alam
Andrea Tongbram
Subramanian Krishnakumar
Jyotirmay Biswas
Bipasha Mukherjee
author_facet Md Shahid Alam
Andrea Tongbram
Subramanian Krishnakumar
Jyotirmay Biswas
Bipasha Mukherjee
author_sort Md Shahid Alam
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section in orbital and adnexal malignancies. Methods: A total of 55 cases between January 2006 and December 2011 for which intraoperative frozen section was performed for various orbital and adnexal lesions were included in the study. The frozen section diagnosis was compared with the permanent section diagnosis. Margin clearance was also compared between the two. Data were analysed using SPSS version 14. Odds ratio and cross-tabulation was used to perform the analysis. Results: The mean age at presentation was 51.46 ± 20 years. Eyelid was the most common site of involvement. Out of 55 cases, diagnosis was deferred in four cases (7.27%) on frozen section. Among 51 cases, 44 (86%) cases were concordant, whereas 7 (13%) cases were discordant. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section compared to permanent section for diagnosis of malignancy was found to be 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section for diagnoses of basal cell carcinoma was found to be 100%, while it was 83.3% and 100% respectively for sebaceous gland carcinoma and 87.5% and 94.9% respectively for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Frozen section had high sensitivity and specificity when compared with permanent section for all three parameters studied. It is an important intraoperative tool that is increasingly being used in histopathological examination of ophthalmic lesions. However, it should not be used as a substitute for the permanent section and critical decisions based on it are best avoided.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T17:00:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e096095699354ddf8428de522d08dded
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T17:00:48Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-e096095699354ddf8428de522d08dded2022-12-21T18:19:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892019-01-0167121988199210.4103/ijo.IJO_2096_18Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignanciesMd Shahid AlamAndrea TongbramSubramanian KrishnakumarJyotirmay BiswasBipasha MukherjeePurpose: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section in orbital and adnexal malignancies. Methods: A total of 55 cases between January 2006 and December 2011 for which intraoperative frozen section was performed for various orbital and adnexal lesions were included in the study. The frozen section diagnosis was compared with the permanent section diagnosis. Margin clearance was also compared between the two. Data were analysed using SPSS version 14. Odds ratio and cross-tabulation was used to perform the analysis. Results: The mean age at presentation was 51.46 ± 20 years. Eyelid was the most common site of involvement. Out of 55 cases, diagnosis was deferred in four cases (7.27%) on frozen section. Among 51 cases, 44 (86%) cases were concordant, whereas 7 (13%) cases were discordant. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section compared to permanent section for diagnosis of malignancy was found to be 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section for diagnoses of basal cell carcinoma was found to be 100%, while it was 83.3% and 100% respectively for sebaceous gland carcinoma and 87.5% and 94.9% respectively for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Frozen section had high sensitivity and specificity when compared with permanent section for all three parameters studied. It is an important intraoperative tool that is increasingly being used in histopathological examination of ophthalmic lesions. However, it should not be used as a substitute for the permanent section and critical decisions based on it are best avoided.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1988;epage=1992;aulast=Alamadnexafrozen sectionorbitpermanent section
spellingShingle Md Shahid Alam
Andrea Tongbram
Subramanian Krishnakumar
Jyotirmay Biswas
Bipasha Mukherjee
Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
adnexa
frozen section
orbit
permanent section
title Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies
topic adnexa
frozen section
orbit
permanent section
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1988;epage=1992;aulast=Alam
work_keys_str_mv AT mdshahidalam sensitivityandspecificityoffrozensectiondiagnosisinorbitalandadnexalmalignancies
AT andreatongbram sensitivityandspecificityoffrozensectiondiagnosisinorbitalandadnexalmalignancies
AT subramaniankrishnakumar sensitivityandspecificityoffrozensectiondiagnosisinorbitalandadnexalmalignancies
AT jyotirmaybiswas sensitivityandspecificityoffrozensectiondiagnosisinorbitalandadnexalmalignancies
AT bipashamukherjee sensitivityandspecificityoffrozensectiondiagnosisinorbitalandadnexalmalignancies