PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY

Objective: to identify characteristics of the nature, content and functioning of prohibition in the legal reality of Russia.Methods: the methodological basis of research is the dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. V. Skorobogatov, N. N. Rybushkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2016-09-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2016
_version_ 1797255961589579776
author A. V. Skorobogatov
N. N. Rybushkin
author_facet A. V. Skorobogatov
N. N. Rybushkin
author_sort A. V. Skorobogatov
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to identify characteristics of the nature, content and functioning of prohibition in the legal reality of Russia.Methods: the methodological basis of research is the dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, as well as a postmodern paradigm, giving the opportunity to explore the legal reality at different levels. Dialectical approach and postmodern paradigm determined the choice of specific research methods: comparative, hermeneutic, discursive.Results: the paper proposes a definition of prohibition as a state- (socio-) volitional constraining (limiting) means that under the threat of legal liability is intended to prevent the wrongful act of the subject (physical or legal entity) and ensure the maintenance of law and order. Prohibition is a necessary means of ensuring the discipline of public relations, and the consolidation of legal values designed to assure the effectiveness of legal regulation. Scientific novelty: for the first time, the article shows that prohibition as a legal category is the ontological basis of legal reality and acts as a determining factor in the content and focus not only of law-making and law enforcement, but legal behavior as well.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and teaching when considering questions about the nature, content and functioning of prohibitions.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:15:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0a2aabc1f954e54bae5782ac634142a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2782-2923
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:14:10Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj.art-e0a2aabc1f954e54bae5782ac634142a2024-03-20T08:16:49ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232016-09-0110310811510.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.3.108-1152014PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITYA. V. Skorobogatov0N. N. Rybushkin1Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)Kazan (Volga) Federal UniversityObjective: to identify characteristics of the nature, content and functioning of prohibition in the legal reality of Russia.Methods: the methodological basis of research is the dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, as well as a postmodern paradigm, giving the opportunity to explore the legal reality at different levels. Dialectical approach and postmodern paradigm determined the choice of specific research methods: comparative, hermeneutic, discursive.Results: the paper proposes a definition of prohibition as a state- (socio-) volitional constraining (limiting) means that under the threat of legal liability is intended to prevent the wrongful act of the subject (physical or legal entity) and ensure the maintenance of law and order. Prohibition is a necessary means of ensuring the discipline of public relations, and the consolidation of legal values designed to assure the effectiveness of legal regulation. Scientific novelty: for the first time, the article shows that prohibition as a legal category is the ontological basis of legal reality and acts as a determining factor in the content and focus not only of law-making and law enforcement, but legal behavior as well.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and teaching when considering questions about the nature, content and functioning of prohibitions.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2016theory and history of law and stateprohibition in lawlegal realitylegal consciousnesslegal archetypelegal limitation
spellingShingle A. V. Skorobogatov
N. N. Rybushkin
PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
theory and history of law and state
prohibition in law
legal reality
legal consciousness
legal archetype
legal limitation
title PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
title_full PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
title_fullStr PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
title_full_unstemmed PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
title_short PROHIBITION AS ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RUSSIAN LEGAL REALITY
title_sort prohibition as ontological basis of the russian legal reality
topic theory and history of law and state
prohibition in law
legal reality
legal consciousness
legal archetype
legal limitation
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2016
work_keys_str_mv AT avskorobogatov prohibitionasontologicalbasisoftherussianlegalreality
AT nnrybushkin prohibitionasontologicalbasisoftherussianlegalreality