“A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context
In the wake of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks embarked on a massive nationalization drive in the sphere of culture. Major art collections once belonging to the court, the nobility, the bourgeoisie, and the church were confiscated and added to the state museum funds. Newly drafted and implem...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Forum Kunst und Markt
2018-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal for Art Market Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://fokum-jams.org/index.php/jams/article/view/22 |
| _version_ | 1819052236241633280 |
|---|---|
| author | Waltraud M. Bayer |
| author_facet | Waltraud M. Bayer |
| author_sort | Waltraud M. Bayer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the wake of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks embarked on a massive nationalization drive in the sphere of culture. Major art collections once belonging to the court, the nobility, the bourgeoisie, and the church were confiscated and added to the state museum funds. Newly drafted and implemented expropriation and nationalization laws allowed formerly private art property to be then sold abroad. The Soviet art sales of the interwar period were disputed: Russian émigrés sued the Soviet government and its Western partners for illegally profiting from auctioning off their rightful private property. To this date, the sales constitute a complex, politically and legally controversial matter. Long taboo, thorough research made possible by perestroika centered notably on the very institutions that suffered the greatest losses – the Hermitage and the Palace-Museums in and around St. Petersburg, and to a lesser extent Moscow institutions. Post-Soviet museum research has yielded impressive results: Above all, it has produced a series of (mostly uncensored, unabridged) publications of edited archival funds. This relates to Jewish collections seized by the National Socialists, to Soviet émigré collections as well as to collections and museum funds of the former Soviet republics. Contemporary Russia regrets the loss of its national heritage; efforts to repurchase art sold in the interwar period are now financed by Russia’s economic elite. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:16:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e0ae6b7a489a40be8f78619363da749d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2511-7602 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:16:37Z |
| publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
| publisher | Forum Kunst und Markt |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal for Art Market Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-e0ae6b7a489a40be8f78619363da749d2022-12-21T19:04:26ZengForum Kunst und MarktJournal for Art Market Studies2511-76022018-05-012210.23690/jams.v2i2.2221“A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global ContextWaltraud M. BayerIn the wake of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks embarked on a massive nationalization drive in the sphere of culture. Major art collections once belonging to the court, the nobility, the bourgeoisie, and the church were confiscated and added to the state museum funds. Newly drafted and implemented expropriation and nationalization laws allowed formerly private art property to be then sold abroad. The Soviet art sales of the interwar period were disputed: Russian émigrés sued the Soviet government and its Western partners for illegally profiting from auctioning off their rightful private property. To this date, the sales constitute a complex, politically and legally controversial matter. Long taboo, thorough research made possible by perestroika centered notably on the very institutions that suffered the greatest losses – the Hermitage and the Palace-Museums in and around St. Petersburg, and to a lesser extent Moscow institutions. Post-Soviet museum research has yielded impressive results: Above all, it has produced a series of (mostly uncensored, unabridged) publications of edited archival funds. This relates to Jewish collections seized by the National Socialists, to Soviet émigré collections as well as to collections and museum funds of the former Soviet republics. Contemporary Russia regrets the loss of its national heritage; efforts to repurchase art sold in the interwar period are now financed by Russia’s economic elite.https://fokum-jams.org/index.php/jams/article/view/22Art Market, Museum Sales, Auctions |
| spellingShingle | Waltraud M. Bayer “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context Journal for Art Market Studies Art Market, Museum Sales, Auctions |
| title | “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context |
| title_full | “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context |
| title_fullStr | “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context |
| title_full_unstemmed | “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context |
| title_short | “A Past That Won’t Pass”: Stalin’s Museum Sales in a Transformed Global Context |
| title_sort | a past that won t pass stalin s museum sales in a transformed global context |
| topic | Art Market, Museum Sales, Auctions |
| url | https://fokum-jams.org/index.php/jams/article/view/22 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT waltraudmbayer apastthatwontpassstalinsmuseumsalesinatransformedglobalcontext |