Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) has gained increased popularity over recent decades and is being employed as an established surgical treatment for several lumbar spine pathologies, including degenerative spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor and some cases of recurrent disc herniat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Healthcare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/21/2814 |
| _version_ | 1797631893918711808 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahmad Essa Munder Shehade Oded Rabau Yossi Smorgick Yigal Mirovsky Yoram Anekstein |
| author_facet | Ahmad Essa Munder Shehade Oded Rabau Yossi Smorgick Yigal Mirovsky Yoram Anekstein |
| author_sort | Ahmad Essa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) has gained increased popularity over recent decades and is being employed as an established surgical treatment for several lumbar spine pathologies, including degenerative spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor and some cases of recurrent disc herniation. Despite the seemingly acceptable fusion rates after TLIF (up to 94%), the literature is still limited regarding the specific location and quality of fusion inside the fixated segment. In this single-institution, retrospective population-based study, we evaluated all post-operative computed tomography (CT) of patients who underwent TLIF surgery at a medium-sized medical center between 2010 and 2020. All CT studies were performed at a minimum of 1 year following the surgery, with a median of 2 years. Each CT study was evaluated for post-operative fusion, specifically in the posterolateral and intervertebral body areas. The fusion’s quality was determined and classified in each area according to Lee’s criteria, as follows: (1) definitive fusion: definitive bony trabecular bridging across the graft host interface; (2) probable fusion: no definitive bony trabecular crossing but with no gap at the graft host interface; (3) possible arthrosis: no bony trabecular crossing with identifiable gap at the graft host interface; (4) definite pseudarthrosis: no traversing trabecular bone with definitive gap. A total of 48 patients were included in this study. The median age was 55.6 years (SD ± 15.4). The median time from surgery to post-operative CT was 2 years (range: 1–10). Full definitive fusion in both posterolateral and intervertebral areas was observed in 48% of patients, and 92% showed definitive fusion in at least one area (either posterolateral or intervertebral body area). When comparing the posterolateral and the intervertebral area fusion rates, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate was observed in the posterolateral area as compared to the intervertebral body area in the long term follow-up (92% vs. 52%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, accounting for several confounding factors, including the number of fixated segments and cage size, the results remained statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.048). In conclusion, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate at the posterolateral area compared to the intervertebral body area following TLIF surgery was found. Surgeons are encouraged to employ bone augmentation material in the posterolateral area (as the primary site of fusion) when performing TLIF surgery. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T11:30:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e0b8a977a7dc40bd9bbf257fb14e727a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2227-9032 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T11:30:09Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Healthcare |
| spelling | doaj.art-e0b8a977a7dc40bd9bbf257fb14e727a2023-11-10T15:03:39ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322023-10-011121281410.3390/healthcare11212814Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF)Ahmad Essa0Munder Shehade1Oded Rabau2Yossi Smorgick3Yigal Mirovsky4Yoram Anekstein5Department of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelDepartment of Orthopedics, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, IsraelTransforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) has gained increased popularity over recent decades and is being employed as an established surgical treatment for several lumbar spine pathologies, including degenerative spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor and some cases of recurrent disc herniation. Despite the seemingly acceptable fusion rates after TLIF (up to 94%), the literature is still limited regarding the specific location and quality of fusion inside the fixated segment. In this single-institution, retrospective population-based study, we evaluated all post-operative computed tomography (CT) of patients who underwent TLIF surgery at a medium-sized medical center between 2010 and 2020. All CT studies were performed at a minimum of 1 year following the surgery, with a median of 2 years. Each CT study was evaluated for post-operative fusion, specifically in the posterolateral and intervertebral body areas. The fusion’s quality was determined and classified in each area according to Lee’s criteria, as follows: (1) definitive fusion: definitive bony trabecular bridging across the graft host interface; (2) probable fusion: no definitive bony trabecular crossing but with no gap at the graft host interface; (3) possible arthrosis: no bony trabecular crossing with identifiable gap at the graft host interface; (4) definite pseudarthrosis: no traversing trabecular bone with definitive gap. A total of 48 patients were included in this study. The median age was 55.6 years (SD ± 15.4). The median time from surgery to post-operative CT was 2 years (range: 1–10). Full definitive fusion in both posterolateral and intervertebral areas was observed in 48% of patients, and 92% showed definitive fusion in at least one area (either posterolateral or intervertebral body area). When comparing the posterolateral and the intervertebral area fusion rates, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate was observed in the posterolateral area as compared to the intervertebral body area in the long term follow-up (92% vs. 52%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, accounting for several confounding factors, including the number of fixated segments and cage size, the results remained statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.048). In conclusion, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate at the posterolateral area compared to the intervertebral body area following TLIF surgery was found. Surgeons are encouraged to employ bone augmentation material in the posterolateral area (as the primary site of fusion) when performing TLIF surgery.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/21/2814fusiontransforaminal lumbar interbody fusionposterolateral fusiondegenerative spineposterior stabilizationintervertebral fusion |
| spellingShingle | Ahmad Essa Munder Shehade Oded Rabau Yossi Smorgick Yigal Mirovsky Yoram Anekstein Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Healthcare fusion transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion posterolateral fusion degenerative spine posterior stabilization intervertebral fusion |
| title | Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) |
| title_full | Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) |
| title_fullStr | Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) |
| title_short | Fusion’s Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF) |
| title_sort | fusion s location and quality within the fixated segment following transforaminal interbody fusion tlif |
| topic | fusion transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion posterolateral fusion degenerative spine posterior stabilization intervertebral fusion |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/21/2814 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadessa fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif AT mundershehade fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif AT odedrabau fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif AT yossismorgick fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif AT yigalmirovsky fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif AT yoramanekstein fusionslocationandqualitywithinthefixatedsegmentfollowingtransforaminalinterbodyfusiontlif |