Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether athletes (ATHL) and non-athletes (NON-ATHL) individuals had similar accuracy in matching intended to actual force during ballistic (BAL) and tonic (TON) isometric contractions. In this cross-sectional study, the subjects were divided into ATHL...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Alex Rizzato, Giovanni Cantarella, Elisa Basso, Antonio Paoli, Luca Rotundo, Patrizia Bisiacchi, Giuseppe Marcolin
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:English
Publicado em: PeerJ Inc. 2024-04-01
coleção:PeerJ
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://peerj.com/articles/17156.pdf
_version_ 1827292265377169408
author Alex Rizzato
Giovanni Cantarella
Elisa Basso
Antonio Paoli
Luca Rotundo
Patrizia Bisiacchi
Giuseppe Marcolin
author_facet Alex Rizzato
Giovanni Cantarella
Elisa Basso
Antonio Paoli
Luca Rotundo
Patrizia Bisiacchi
Giuseppe Marcolin
author_sort Alex Rizzato
collection DOAJ
description This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether athletes (ATHL) and non-athletes (NON-ATHL) individuals had similar accuracy in matching intended to actual force during ballistic (BAL) and tonic (TON) isometric contractions. In this cross-sectional study, the subjects were divided into ATHL (n = 20; 22.4 ± 2.3 yrs; 73.2 ± 15.7 kg; 1.76 ± 0.08 m) and NON-ATHL (n = 20; 24.6 ± 2.4 yrs; 68.2 ± 15.0 kg; 1.73 ± 0.1 m) groups. The isometric quadriceps strength was measured with a load cell applied to a custom-built chair. For each condition, subjects performed at first three maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) as reference. Then, subjects had to match three intended force intensities expressed in percentage of the MVIC (i.e., 25%, 50%, and 75%) without any external feedback. Subjects performed three trials for each force intensity. The accuracy (AC) was calculated as the absolute difference in percentage between the intended and the actual force. A Likert scale was administered for each trial to assess the subjective matching between the intended and the actual force. Statistical analysis showed that the ATHL group was more accurate (p < 0.001) than the NON-ATHL group. In contrast, the AC (p < 0.001) was lower when the force intensities increased independently from the group. Moreover, significantly higher AC (p < 0.001) and lower aggregate Likert scores (p < 0.001) were found in BAL than TON conditions. These results suggest that (i) sports practice could enhance muscle recruitment strategies by increasing the AC in the isometric task; (ii) differences between intended and actual force appeared to be intensity-dependent with lower AC at high force intensities; (iii) different control systems act in modulating BAL and TON contractions.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:00:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0c57f54db194a749ae6da337e70afe2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:00:13Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-e0c57f54db194a749ae6da337e70afe22024-04-05T15:05:07ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592024-04-0112e1715610.7717/peerj.17156Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletesAlex Rizzato0Giovanni Cantarella1Elisa Basso2Antonio Paoli3Luca Rotundo4Patrizia Bisiacchi5Giuseppe Marcolin6Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, ItalyThis cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether athletes (ATHL) and non-athletes (NON-ATHL) individuals had similar accuracy in matching intended to actual force during ballistic (BAL) and tonic (TON) isometric contractions. In this cross-sectional study, the subjects were divided into ATHL (n = 20; 22.4 ± 2.3 yrs; 73.2 ± 15.7 kg; 1.76 ± 0.08 m) and NON-ATHL (n = 20; 24.6 ± 2.4 yrs; 68.2 ± 15.0 kg; 1.73 ± 0.1 m) groups. The isometric quadriceps strength was measured with a load cell applied to a custom-built chair. For each condition, subjects performed at first three maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) as reference. Then, subjects had to match three intended force intensities expressed in percentage of the MVIC (i.e., 25%, 50%, and 75%) without any external feedback. Subjects performed three trials for each force intensity. The accuracy (AC) was calculated as the absolute difference in percentage between the intended and the actual force. A Likert scale was administered for each trial to assess the subjective matching between the intended and the actual force. Statistical analysis showed that the ATHL group was more accurate (p < 0.001) than the NON-ATHL group. In contrast, the AC (p < 0.001) was lower when the force intensities increased independently from the group. Moreover, significantly higher AC (p < 0.001) and lower aggregate Likert scores (p < 0.001) were found in BAL than TON conditions. These results suggest that (i) sports practice could enhance muscle recruitment strategies by increasing the AC in the isometric task; (ii) differences between intended and actual force appeared to be intensity-dependent with lower AC at high force intensities; (iii) different control systems act in modulating BAL and TON contractions.https://peerj.com/articles/17156.pdfIsometric strengthLeg extensionMaximal voluntary contractionForce modulationSubjective perception
spellingShingle Alex Rizzato
Giovanni Cantarella
Elisa Basso
Antonio Paoli
Luca Rotundo
Patrizia Bisiacchi
Giuseppe Marcolin
Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
PeerJ
Isometric strength
Leg extension
Maximal voluntary contraction
Force modulation
Subjective perception
title Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
title_full Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
title_fullStr Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
title_short Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes
title_sort relationship between intended force and actual force comparison between athletes and non athletes
topic Isometric strength
Leg extension
Maximal voluntary contraction
Force modulation
Subjective perception
url https://peerj.com/articles/17156.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alexrizzato relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT giovannicantarella relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT elisabasso relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT antoniopaoli relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT lucarotundo relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT patriziabisiacchi relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes
AT giuseppemarcolin relationshipbetweenintendedforceandactualforcecomparisonbetweenathletesandnonathletes