The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review

Abstract Background Telemedicine includes the delivery of health-care services and sharing of health information across distances. Past research has found that telemedicine can play a role in enhancing complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) while allowing the maintenance of cult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aimun Qadeer Shah, Noella Noronha, Robert Chin-See, Christina Hanna, Zeest Kadri, Amn Marwaha, Neetu Rambharack, Jeremy Y. Ng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04100-x
_version_ 1797752870760611840
author Aimun Qadeer Shah
Noella Noronha
Robert Chin-See
Christina Hanna
Zeest Kadri
Amn Marwaha
Neetu Rambharack
Jeremy Y. Ng
author_facet Aimun Qadeer Shah
Noella Noronha
Robert Chin-See
Christina Hanna
Zeest Kadri
Amn Marwaha
Neetu Rambharack
Jeremy Y. Ng
author_sort Aimun Qadeer Shah
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Telemedicine includes the delivery of health-care services and sharing of health information across distances. Past research has found that telemedicine can play a role in enhancing complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) while allowing the maintenance of cultural values and ancestral knowledge. This scoping review synthesized evidence regarding the use of telemedicine in the context of CAIM. Methods Following Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE and AMED databases were searched systematically. The CADTH website was also searched for grey literature. Eligible articles included a CAIM practice or therapy offered through telemedicine, with no restrictions placed on the type of telemedicine technology used. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to synthesise common themes among the included studies. Results Sixty-two articles were included in this synthesis. The following themes emerged: 1) the practitioner view of CAIM delivered through telemedicine, 2) the patient view of CAIM delivered through telemedicine, and 3) the technological impacts of telemedicine delivery of CAIM. Conclusions Studies have shown that telemedicine delivery of CAIM is feasible, acceptable, and results in positive health outcomes. Some barriers remain such as the presence of chronic illness and morbidity, inability to form strong patient-provider relationships relative to face-to-face approaches, and technological difficulties. Future intervention research should focus on reducing such barriers, as well as explore which patient population would realize the greatest benefit from CAIM delivered via telemedicine, and the impact of interventions on providers and caregivers.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:10:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0ca6599ac644169812edcb640c66fd4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-7671
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:10:45Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
spelling doaj.art-e0ca6599ac644169812edcb640c66fd42023-08-06T11:06:40ZengBMCBMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies2662-76712023-08-0123114010.1186/s12906-023-04100-xThe use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping reviewAimun Qadeer Shah0Noella Noronha1Robert Chin-See2Christina Hanna3Zeest Kadri4Amn Marwaha5Neetu Rambharack6Jeremy Y. Ng7Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityAbstract Background Telemedicine includes the delivery of health-care services and sharing of health information across distances. Past research has found that telemedicine can play a role in enhancing complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) while allowing the maintenance of cultural values and ancestral knowledge. This scoping review synthesized evidence regarding the use of telemedicine in the context of CAIM. Methods Following Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE and AMED databases were searched systematically. The CADTH website was also searched for grey literature. Eligible articles included a CAIM practice or therapy offered through telemedicine, with no restrictions placed on the type of telemedicine technology used. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to synthesise common themes among the included studies. Results Sixty-two articles were included in this synthesis. The following themes emerged: 1) the practitioner view of CAIM delivered through telemedicine, 2) the patient view of CAIM delivered through telemedicine, and 3) the technological impacts of telemedicine delivery of CAIM. Conclusions Studies have shown that telemedicine delivery of CAIM is feasible, acceptable, and results in positive health outcomes. Some barriers remain such as the presence of chronic illness and morbidity, inability to form strong patient-provider relationships relative to face-to-face approaches, and technological difficulties. Future intervention research should focus on reducing such barriers, as well as explore which patient population would realize the greatest benefit from CAIM delivered via telemedicine, and the impact of interventions on providers and caregivers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04100-xcomplementary and alternative medicineeHealthintegrative medicinescoping reviewtelehealthtelemedicine
spellingShingle Aimun Qadeer Shah
Noella Noronha
Robert Chin-See
Christina Hanna
Zeest Kadri
Amn Marwaha
Neetu Rambharack
Jeremy Y. Ng
The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
complementary and alternative medicine
eHealth
integrative medicine
scoping review
telehealth
telemedicine
title The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
title_full The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
title_fullStr The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
title_short The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review
title_sort use and effects of telemedicine on complementary alternative and integrative medicine practices a scoping review
topic complementary and alternative medicine
eHealth
integrative medicine
scoping review
telehealth
telemedicine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04100-x
work_keys_str_mv AT aimunqadeershah theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT noellanoronha theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT robertchinsee theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT christinahanna theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT zeestkadri theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT amnmarwaha theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT neeturambharack theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT jeremyyng theuseandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT aimunqadeershah useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT noellanoronha useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT robertchinsee useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT christinahanna useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT zeestkadri useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT amnmarwaha useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT neeturambharack useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview
AT jeremyyng useandeffectsoftelemedicineoncomplementaryalternativeandintegrativemedicinepracticesascopingreview