PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET

Abstract: the pharmacoeconomic study compared the standard drug therapy (vitamin D and phosphorbinders) of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) to the using a combination of Mimpara (Cinalcet), vitamin D and phosphorbinders in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Comparison was carried...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. I. Yagudina, V. G. Serpik
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: IRBIS LLC 2015-03-01
Series:Фармакоэкономика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/39
_version_ 1797878979788537856
author R. I. Yagudina
V. G. Serpik
author_facet R. I. Yagudina
V. G. Serpik
author_sort R. I. Yagudina
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: the pharmacoeconomic study compared the standard drug therapy (vitamin D and phosphorbinders) of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) to the using a combination of Mimpara (Cinalcet), vitamin D and phosphorbinders in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Comparison was carried out by mean of «cost-efficacy» analysis, as the main performance indicator has been selected % of patients reaching the target values of K / DOQI of the main biochemical parameters - parathyroid hormone level and CaxP. The use of Mimpara demonstrated advantages over standard treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism to reduce the complications of the cardiovascular system and musculoskeletal system, reduce the dose of vitamin D and advantages in terms of «cost-efficacy» analysis. The cost of achieving the goals of treatment (values of K / DOQI of the main biochemical parameters) in one patient for the time horizon of 26 weeks of the first year of treatment for a combination of Mimpara, vitamin E and drugs phosphorbinders was 20,709 rubles. (Taking into account the costs of dialysis treatments), and for standard therapy - 110,092 rubles (Taking into account the costs of dialysis treatments). Thus, treatment of SHPT combination of vitamin D, drugs and phosphorbinders and Mimpara can be considered as an alternative to the dominant position of pharmacoeconomic analysis in comparison to therapy with vitamin D and phosphorbinders only.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:40:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0fc1b4029ec4c6dbe0bc4d55aa0321e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2070-4909
2070-4933
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:40:40Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher IRBIS LLC
record_format Article
series Фармакоэкономика
spelling doaj.art-e0fc1b4029ec4c6dbe0bc4d55aa0321e2023-03-13T07:48:14ZrusIRBIS LLCФармакоэкономика2070-49092070-49332015-03-0153334033PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCETR. I. Yagudina0V. G. Serpik1Laboratory of pharmacoeconomic researches of the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, MoscowLaboratory of pharmacoeconomic researches of the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, MoscowAbstract: the pharmacoeconomic study compared the standard drug therapy (vitamin D and phosphorbinders) of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) to the using a combination of Mimpara (Cinalcet), vitamin D and phosphorbinders in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Comparison was carried out by mean of «cost-efficacy» analysis, as the main performance indicator has been selected % of patients reaching the target values of K / DOQI of the main biochemical parameters - parathyroid hormone level and CaxP. The use of Mimpara demonstrated advantages over standard treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism to reduce the complications of the cardiovascular system and musculoskeletal system, reduce the dose of vitamin D and advantages in terms of «cost-efficacy» analysis. The cost of achieving the goals of treatment (values of K / DOQI of the main biochemical parameters) in one patient for the time horizon of 26 weeks of the first year of treatment for a combination of Mimpara, vitamin E and drugs phosphorbinders was 20,709 rubles. (Taking into account the costs of dialysis treatments), and for standard therapy - 110,092 rubles (Taking into account the costs of dialysis treatments). Thus, treatment of SHPT combination of vitamin D, drugs and phosphorbinders and Mimpara can be considered as an alternative to the dominant position of pharmacoeconomic analysis in comparison to therapy with vitamin D and phosphorbinders only.https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/39pharmacoceconomic analysis«cost-efficacy» analysissecondary hyperparathyroidismcinacalcetmimpara
spellingShingle R. I. Yagudina
V. G. Serpik
PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
Фармакоэкономика
pharmacoceconomic analysis
«cost-efficacy» analysis
secondary hyperparathyroidism
cinacalcet
mimpara
title PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
title_full PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
title_fullStr PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
title_full_unstemmed PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
title_short PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS WITH CINACALCET
title_sort pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on dialysis with cinacalcet
topic pharmacoceconomic analysis
«cost-efficacy» analysis
secondary hyperparathyroidism
cinacalcet
mimpara
url https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/39
work_keys_str_mv AT riyagudina pharmacoeconomicevaluationoftreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsondialysiswithcinacalcet
AT vgserpik pharmacoeconomicevaluationoftreatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminpatientsondialysiswithcinacalcet