Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds

Background: Surgical wounds in diabetic patients still remain a problem till the present day. As a common plant found around the world, Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae) is traditionally prepared as an oily extract and used as a folk remedy for various diseases such as wounds, burns, cuts, etc....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Altıparmak, Teoman Eskitaşçıoğlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Investigative Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1272654
_version_ 1827817245396434944
author Mehmet Altıparmak
Teoman Eskitaşçıoğlu
author_facet Mehmet Altıparmak
Teoman Eskitaşçıoğlu
author_sort Mehmet Altıparmak
collection DOAJ
description Background: Surgical wounds in diabetic patients still remain a problem till the present day. As a common plant found around the world, Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae) is traditionally prepared as an oily extract and used as a folk remedy for various diseases such as wounds, burns, cuts, etc. This study aims to evaluate the effect of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) on problematic wounds while comparing oral and topical applications. Methods: Incisional and excisional wound models were made on the dorsal regions of 54 diabetic Spraque–Dawley rats. The rats were divided into the following six groups (n = 9): Group 1: control, Group 2: diabetic, Group 3: diabetic oral Hypericum perforatum, Group 4: diabetic topical Hypericum perforatum, Group 5: diabetic oral olive oil, and Group 6: diabetic topical olive oil. Results: Groups 3 and 4 had significantly higher tensile strength, tissue hydroxyproline concentration, and collagen density compared with Group 2. Inflammatory cell density and collagen density on day 3 were significantly higher in Groups 3 and 6 compared with Group 2. On day 21, Groups 3 and 6 had significantly higher fibroblastic activity compared with Group 2. Conclusions: This study has proved that oral St. John's wort has more positive effects on problematic wounds compared with topical St. John's wort and olive oil, which is a vehicle. Hypericum perforatum results with faster inflammatory response and better healing. These results could be an addition to literature about the clinical usage of Hypericum perforatum on diabetic wounds.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:32:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e10f421048864a9881e3f50d76e2920c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0894-1939
1521-0553
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:32:39Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Investigative Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e10f421048864a9881e3f50d76e2920c2023-09-15T10:12:27ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Investigative Surgery0894-19391521-05532018-01-01311293710.1080/08941939.2016.12726541272654Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical WoundsMehmet Altıparmak0Teoman Eskitaşçıoğlu1Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryReconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryBackground: Surgical wounds in diabetic patients still remain a problem till the present day. As a common plant found around the world, Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae) is traditionally prepared as an oily extract and used as a folk remedy for various diseases such as wounds, burns, cuts, etc. This study aims to evaluate the effect of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) on problematic wounds while comparing oral and topical applications. Methods: Incisional and excisional wound models were made on the dorsal regions of 54 diabetic Spraque–Dawley rats. The rats were divided into the following six groups (n = 9): Group 1: control, Group 2: diabetic, Group 3: diabetic oral Hypericum perforatum, Group 4: diabetic topical Hypericum perforatum, Group 5: diabetic oral olive oil, and Group 6: diabetic topical olive oil. Results: Groups 3 and 4 had significantly higher tensile strength, tissue hydroxyproline concentration, and collagen density compared with Group 2. Inflammatory cell density and collagen density on day 3 were significantly higher in Groups 3 and 6 compared with Group 2. On day 21, Groups 3 and 6 had significantly higher fibroblastic activity compared with Group 2. Conclusions: This study has proved that oral St. John's wort has more positive effects on problematic wounds compared with topical St. John's wort and olive oil, which is a vehicle. Hypericum perforatum results with faster inflammatory response and better healing. These results could be an addition to literature about the clinical usage of Hypericum perforatum on diabetic wounds.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1272654diabetic woundswound healinghypericum perforatumst john's wortsurgical woundexperimental
spellingShingle Mehmet Altıparmak
Teoman Eskitaşçıoğlu
Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
Journal of Investigative Surgery
diabetic wounds
wound healing
hypericum perforatum
st john's wort
surgical wound
experimental
title Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
title_full Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
title_fullStr Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
title_short Comparison of Systemic and Topical Hypericum Perforatum on Diabetic Surgical Wounds
title_sort comparison of systemic and topical hypericum perforatum on diabetic surgical wounds
topic diabetic wounds
wound healing
hypericum perforatum
st john's wort
surgical wound
experimental
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1272654
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetaltıparmak comparisonofsystemicandtopicalhypericumperforatumondiabeticsurgicalwounds
AT teomaneskitascıoglu comparisonofsystemicandtopicalhypericumperforatumondiabeticsurgicalwounds