Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study
Introduction: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2023;volume=15;issue=6;spage=1132;epage=1135;aulast=K. |
| _version_ | 1797738559750275072 |
|---|---|
| author | Dhiraj Kumar K. Umbare Rahul Patil Saurabh Sabnis Renu Yadav Sushant B Satdive Sachin S Kandalkar |
| author_facet | Dhiraj Kumar K. Umbare Rahul Patil Saurabh Sabnis Renu Yadav Sushant B Satdive Sachin S Kandalkar |
| author_sort | Dhiraj Kumar K. Umbare |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. Aim and Objective: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. Materials and Methods: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. Result: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. Conclusion: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:44:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e11b76a91b954b90be9c8ec941888541 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:44:33Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-e11b76a91b954b90be9c8ec9418885412023-08-23T09:45:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062023-01-011561132113510.4103/jpbs.jpbs_191_23Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative studyDhiraj Kumar K. UmbareRahul PatilSaurabh SabnisRenu YadavSushant B SatdiveSachin S KandalkarIntroduction: The pulp is the most negatively impacted tissue during decalcification since it comprises the soft tissue components. The most effective decalcifying agent would be safest for cells and tissues while yet removing all traces of calcium. It has to get the job done quickly and have good staining properties. Aim and Objective: The goal of this research was to identify the most effective decalcifying agent for diagnostic purposes via a qualitative investigation of tissue preservation and a comparison of the efficiency of several decalcifying agents on human permanent teeth, covering both hard and soft tissue components. Materials and Methods: Fifty premolars from people aged 14 to 30 who needed them pulled for orthodontics were included in the research. Participants in the research were divided into five groups of ten. Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, and Group E make up the total of five groups. In this investigation, we compared the efficiency of five decalcifying chemicals and analyzed their staining patterns and effects on tooth tissue. Fifty premolar teeth from participants aged 14–30 years old were removed for orthodontic therapy. For the research, they were split up into five groups of ten. Group A contains 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group B contains 10% formic acid, Group C contains 5% Trichoraticectic acid, Group D contains 5% nitric acid, and Group E contains 5% formalin-nitric acid. Result: Regardless of the specifics of the chosen decalcification solution, all procedures benefit from the inclusion of external stimuli. None of the variables were used in the current investigation; it was conducted only to compare various decalcifying chemicals. Conclusion: When time is not a concern, neutral EDTA may be recommended for preservation and presentation because of its ability to maintain soft-tissue integrity and provide high-quality staining. The formalin-nitric acid solution was one agent that appeared to strike a good compromise between speed and tissue preservation.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2023;volume=15;issue=6;spage=1132;epage=1135;aulast=K.decalcificationdecalcifying agentsedtaextracted tooth |
| spellingShingle | Dhiraj Kumar K. Umbare Rahul Patil Saurabh Sabnis Renu Yadav Sushant B Satdive Sachin S Kandalkar Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences decalcification decalcifying agents edta extracted tooth |
| title | Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study |
| title_full | Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study |
| title_short | Evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth: A comparative study |
| title_sort | evaluation of different decalcification agents on extracted tooth a comparative study |
| topic | decalcification decalcifying agents edta extracted tooth |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2023;volume=15;issue=6;spage=1132;epage=1135;aulast=K. |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dhirajkumarkumbare evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT rahulpatil evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT saurabhsabnis evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT renuyadav evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT sushantbsatdive evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy AT sachinskandalkar evaluationofdifferentdecalcificationagentsonextractedtoothacomparativestudy |