THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION

Objective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps. Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients. Trau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G.D. KARIM-ZADE, M.KH. MALIKOV, B.A. ODINAEV, M.A. KHASANOV, N.M. MIRZOEV, N.A. MAKHMADKULOVA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Avicenna Tajik State Medical University 2021-09-01
Series:Паёми Сино
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2021-23-3-450-461
_version_ 1797801138310873088
author G.D. KARIM-ZADE
M.KH. MALIKOV
B.A. ODINAEV
M.A. KHASANOV
N.M. MIRZOEV
N.A. MAKHMADKULOVA
author_facet G.D. KARIM-ZADE
M.KH. MALIKOV
B.A. ODINAEV
M.A. KHASANOV
N.M. MIRZOEV
N.A. MAKHMADKULOVA
author_sort G.D. KARIM-ZADE
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps. Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients. Traumatic injuries to the forearm and hand structures with soft tissue defects occurred in 11 patients, and 26 trauma patients were hospitalized. The patients had superficial soft tissue defects (STDs) involving various areas, accompanied by damage to the underlying neurovascular bundles (NVBs), tendons and bones. Results: Depending on the nature of trauma and the injured tissues’ state, the reconstruction sequence’s principle was followed. In 32 (86.5%) cases, the restoration of functional skin integument and reconstruction of injured anatomical structures of the limb were performed in a single stage. Twostage reconstruction was carried out in 5 (13.5%) patients, with initial STDs repair followed by reconstruction of the NVBs and tendons. Selection criteria for a sequence of surgical repair included the nature of the injury and the severity of the patient’s condition in emergencies. The following grafts were used: RFFF: radial forearm free flap (n=3); RRF: the reverse radial forearm flap (n=25); the ulnar reverse forearm flap (n=6), PIA: posterior interosseous artery flap (n=3). In the immediate postoperative period, compromised blood circulation in the transplanted flaps were observed in 2 (5.4%) cases. Timely diagnosis and treatment resulted in a positive outcome. Long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstruction were considered acceptable in all patients. Conclusion: A proper surgical procedure selection for UL structures injuries and their consequences influences long term postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes. Choice of single or multiple stages of reconstruction largely depends on the location of the defect, the state of the tissues in the recipient area and the nature of the injury to the underlying anatomical structures of the limb.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:45:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e11da29ce0af4111b3b7a3d046623056
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2074-0581
2959-6327
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:45:52Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
record_format Article
series Паёми Сино
spelling doaj.art-e11da29ce0af4111b3b7a3d0466230562023-06-18T19:56:43ZengAvicenna Tajik State Medical UniversityПаёми Сино2074-05812959-63272021-09-0123345046110.25005/2074-0581-2021-23-3-450-461THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTIONG.D. KARIM-ZADE0M.KH. MALIKOV1B.A. ODINAEV2M.A. KHASANOV3N.M. MIRZOEV4N.A. MAKHMADKULOVA5Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanDepartment of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanDepartment of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanDepartment of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanDepartment of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanDepartment of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of TajikistanObjective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps. Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients. Traumatic injuries to the forearm and hand structures with soft tissue defects occurred in 11 patients, and 26 trauma patients were hospitalized. The patients had superficial soft tissue defects (STDs) involving various areas, accompanied by damage to the underlying neurovascular bundles (NVBs), tendons and bones. Results: Depending on the nature of trauma and the injured tissues’ state, the reconstruction sequence’s principle was followed. In 32 (86.5%) cases, the restoration of functional skin integument and reconstruction of injured anatomical structures of the limb were performed in a single stage. Twostage reconstruction was carried out in 5 (13.5%) patients, with initial STDs repair followed by reconstruction of the NVBs and tendons. Selection criteria for a sequence of surgical repair included the nature of the injury and the severity of the patient’s condition in emergencies. The following grafts were used: RFFF: radial forearm free flap (n=3); RRF: the reverse radial forearm flap (n=25); the ulnar reverse forearm flap (n=6), PIA: posterior interosseous artery flap (n=3). In the immediate postoperative period, compromised blood circulation in the transplanted flaps were observed in 2 (5.4%) cases. Timely diagnosis and treatment resulted in a positive outcome. Long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstruction were considered acceptable in all patients. Conclusion: A proper surgical procedure selection for UL structures injuries and their consequences influences long term postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes. Choice of single or multiple stages of reconstruction largely depends on the location of the defect, the state of the tissues in the recipient area and the nature of the injury to the underlying anatomical structures of the limb.https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2021-23-3-450-461upper limbinjuries and their consequencessoft-tissue defectflaps.
spellingShingle G.D. KARIM-ZADE
M.KH. MALIKOV
B.A. ODINAEV
M.A. KHASANOV
N.M. MIRZOEV
N.A. MAKHMADKULOVA
THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
Паёми Сино
upper limb
injuries and their consequences
soft-tissue defect
flaps.
title THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
title_full THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
title_fullStr THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
title_full_unstemmed THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
title_short THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
title_sort outcomes of the forearm flap applications in the upper limb severe injuries reconstruction
topic upper limb
injuries and their consequences
soft-tissue defect
flaps.
url https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2021-23-3-450-461
work_keys_str_mv AT gdkarimzade theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT mkhmalikov theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT baodinaev theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT makhasanov theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT nmmirzoev theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT namakhmadkulova theoutcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT gdkarimzade outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT mkhmalikov outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT baodinaev outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT makhasanov outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT nmmirzoev outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction
AT namakhmadkulova outcomesoftheforearmflapapplicationsintheupperlimbsevereinjuriesreconstruction